Essay On Wolf Children

Cited Oysterman, Elmore and Smith, identity are the traits and characteristics, social relations, roles and social groups memberships that define who one is. In this way, examining the reciprocal connection of individual and society will be crucial to comprehend of how society makes man. Human beings are social beings, for the reason is that individual cannot be isolated from society, in the same manner with the case of “Wolf-Children” of India exemplify that no one can mature normally without social interactions. Language, gestures and symbols which everyone taken for granted within social interactions are unwittingly socializing every individual into behaving as their society desires and constructing their social reality. Thereupon, a person

Such as the words “Boy” and “Girls”, those functioned as a gendered identifier to classify children in different identity by associating most closely with how others interact with them and begin the process of the child into being as a boy or girl. Under the gender socialization, family agents are conventionally pass down the a number of gender stereotypes, which are the ideology of how boys and girls act and think, as an illustration, for boys, man-centered phrases like “Boys don’t cry” will be used; or for girls, woman-centered phrases like “Girls do cooking” will be used to conforming them into behaving traditional masculine and femininity. In other situations, the languages used on female generally contain more sense of contempt than male. By way of illustration, majority of woman-centered phrases brings a taste of stigmatizing, such as “Don’t run like a girl” and “Girls are nosy”, they all seems attempting to belittle woman which man is more superior. When it came to moral issue, the general public usual unwittingly criticizes the opposite sex of male in a severer level than man. For example, woman who has multiple sexual partners will be stigmatized in a wider range of verbal expressions than man. Since learning language can’t be separated from those interactions, they simultaneously located how they were identified by others; therefore, they conceptualized those ideal images of themselves from the external social facts and internalized those gender characteristics as their part of