Sciences And Amour-Propre In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1440 Words6 Pages
Rousseau’s perception of gender roles, mans inherently good nature, the study of sciences and amour-propre appear in Mary Shelley 's Frankenstein from her character portrayal. Shelley depicts the invention of a creature that defies scientific boundaries and whose presence shocks its creator. Since Victor refuses to understand what he created, he abandons the new found life out of utter confusion and shock. The creature lives and travels and eventually discovers other individuals that ultimately lead him to acquire a malicious nature. The creature assimilates with others corruption and Shelley utilizes this to show an individual 's power over one 's thoughts and views of themself. These same aspects continue with the creatures diminishing amour-propre, Shelley presents a highly intelligent creature who can’t love…show more content…
From his studies, he finds himself living unhealthy yet unable to leave his work. Shelley displays a dark period that leaves Victor mentally unstable from his scientific discoveries. She also portrays the effects of outside forces on human kindness through the creature’s diminishing good nature. From the creature’s formation Shelley describes his love and hope in the world yet when his interactions with others end poorly his inherently good nature disappears. Shelley’s confirmation of Rousseau’s work continues when she characterizes the women in her novel as submissive. With the use of Justine and Elizabeth, Shelley shows how women conform to fit into the life of man. This contributes to Rousseau’s theory that women need men in their life to survive and live well. Moreover, Shelley adds to Rousseau’s work on amour-propre. She uses the creature’s discovery of his differences from him and the DeLacey’s as a connection to falling amour-propre. Overall, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein continuously utilizes Rousseau’s work to help establish her own
Open Document