During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Creek Indians, also known as the Muscogee, were one of the most powerful and influential indigenous nations in what is now considered the southeastern United States. Creek Country, a book written by Robbie Ethridge, describes the different traditions, economics, and interactions with different countries that the Creek Indians participated in. The main aspects that will be discussed throughout this essay is the involvement of the Creek Indians with their relationship to the land, their economic activities, and how they displayed their gender roles. All of these different things that the Creek Indians exhibited in their lifestyles can be viewed to see how they thrived and also failed throughout …show more content…
In chapter two of the book, the text discusses how the women primarily held the role of cultivating crops and taking care of the house, while the men were primarily responsible for hunting and gathering, trade, and reparation of buildings for their village. The text supports these statements about the women by saying, “The women of a huti tended their fields in the morning…”, and “In the afternoon they would gather at one of their compounds to sew, cook, and make pottery…” (Ethridge, 99). The text also supports the statements about the men by stating, “The men…spent much of their time…to repair or rebuild the public buildings or work on their own homes or those of their kinspeople” (Ethridge, 99). Another thing that is noted in chapter two is that the gender roles were not completely fixed. Additionally, it is described how women approached diplomacy and resistance when their ancestral land was being stripped from them by the white …show more content…
The usage of the land was important for the Creek people, and within this importance was political, commercial, and combative power. The text illustrates this in chapter four by saying, “They also had equally strong practical bonds to the land formed by their subsistence and commercial needs and certain political imperatives” (Ethridge, 54). The Creek Indians lived in river valleys, and therefore forged their towns and villages to make the most out of the natural resources that were available in that kind of landscape. An image of this kind of landscape may be seen by reading the text, “The land rises from the river with sublime magnificence…present to view a delightful varied landscape…” (Ethridge, 55). All of these descriptions are viewed as intriguing when it comes to traditional farming and gathering, and the usage of the rivers also aided with transportation for the
Gary Clayton Anderson is an American historian who is currently a professor at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, OK. He is focused mainly on the history of native people in the Great Plains and southwest region of the United States. Anderson received his bachelor’s degree from Concordia College in Moorhead, MN, his master’s degree from the University of South Dakota in Vermillion, SD, and his Ph.D. from the University of Toledo in Toledo, OH. Along with the classes he teaches, Anderson travels around the country giving lectures about relations between Native Americans and white settlers and other related topics.
The author Daniel Henry Usner Jr brings the lower Mississippi Valley before 1783 into focus and delivers a coherent story of the complex social and economic history that is entangled into the Lower Mississippi Valley region. Usner reveals in this monograph the daily interactions between Europeans, Africans, and Indians in early colonial America. The study concentrates on the region along the Gulf Coast and depicts the frequent changes of political power beginning with the occupation of the French from 1699 to the early 1760s, and then the divided occupation of the Gulf Coast between the Spanish and the British from the early 1760s until the early 1780s. Usner does a notable job of exploiting the active participation in the local and regional
In the article by Anthony F. C. Wallace, “The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America,” the reasons for America's need for Indian land is discussed. The purpose of this article is to explain the Indian removal that occurred under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The thesis of this essay states that Americans kicked the Natives off of their land to fulfill a selfish desire to expand the cotton industry. The first point Wallace uses to support his thesis is how Jackson’s financial interest in the land affected the removal of Natives.
The purpose of this chapter was to illustrate what had happened prior to the Sand Creek Massacre and explain the process of retaliation that the Indians had against the United States government. As well as to tell the story of Sitting Bull, one of the most known Native American leaders. The value within this source includes that the author included background information about the people involved in the Sand Creek Massacre. Another value of this source is the amount of explanation about the people involved, this source gives details of the relationship between Indians and the Chiefs of Fort Lyon. The limitations include that the author only focused on the perspective of the Native Americans and neglected the perspective of the volunteer army or Colonel Chievington.
Author Dee Brown presents a factual as well as an emotional version of the relationship among the Indians, the American settlers, and the U.S. government. The massacre at Wounded Knee Creek in South Dakota on December 29, 1890, provides the backdrop for the narrative. In his introduction, Brown states the reason for his work. Thousands of accounts about life in the American West of the late nineteenth century were written. Stories are told of the traders, ranchers, wagon trains, gunfighters, and gold-seekers.
As Europeans began to infiltrate the territory the Cherokee nation inhabited in the mid-1700s, Cherokee men’s power increased, drawing them into more traditional masculine roles. However, Cherokee women, Perdue argues, maintained their roles and power within the nation. She posits that their influence may
In The McGillivray Moment, President George Washington was worried that the Creek Nation was going to over inhabit the land to the west of the Mississippi river, also known as the land of America’s future. Washington was now faced with a problem, “The land west of the Mississippi must be inhabited by whites…, and the rights of the Native Americans to their tribal land must be protected.” That’s when Washington met Chief McGillivray, McGillivray was one of the,” twenty-seven Indian Chiefs representing all the major tribes of the Creek Nation” that paraded into the capital of the newly created
Seminole defiance of federal and Creek tribal pressures contributed to their right to govern themselves, define their own membership and property; and regulate their business and domestic
2. Division of labor: Women were primarily responsible for domestic duties, such as cooking, cleaning, and child-rearing, while men focused on agriculture, trade,
The Creek Indians did not band together with one mindset and one goal in pushing out the white people from their land, instead some Creeks wanting to accept the way of the white man and their civilization in order to live together in peace while others, calling themselves “Red Sticks” insisting on their
Although Native Americans are characterized as both civilized and uncivilized in module one readings, their lifestyles and culture are observed to be civilized more often than not. The separate and distinct duties of men and women (Sigard, 1632) reveal a society that has defined roles and expectations based on gender. There are customs related to courtship (Le Clercq, 1691) that are similar to European cultures. Marriage was a recognized union amongst Native Americans, although not necessarily viewed as a serious, lifelong commitment like the Europeans (Heckewelder, 1819). Related to gender roles in Native American culture, Sigard writes of the Huron people that “Just as the men have their special occupation and understand wherein a man’s duty consists, so also the women and girls keep their place and perform quietly their little tasks and functions of service”.
This book was written fifty years ago based of written letters from George Bent during the 1800’s. This was a time when Indian trade and American trade were at a high peak and George Bent encountered multiple interactions with Native Americans within Bent’s Fort. Bent’s written accounts within the period of war from 1863 to 1868 were particularly important because he was an eye witness to first hand accounts and wrote deeply about them to civilization. This book review focuses on, Bent’s significance as an inside view of Cheyenne life and the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864. Life of George Bent: written From his Letters gave an authentic view of what happened, as the Cheyennes, Arapahos, and Sioux saw it.
Through the first half of this semester I have examined the undeniable truths of how Westward Expansion has affected Indians. It has encouraged me even more so to explore both sides of the story. I did not know how horrible Indians lives were when the outsiders invaded their land. I have been enlightened through this material concerning the mental and physical aspects of the westward expansion. The poor treatment towards Indians are shown immensely through the removal, and the stripping of their culture.
Some settlers shared an interest in modernization and commercial exchange. The European settlers were attracted to the region’s river valleys because of the connection to other markets they provided. It was all about exchanging with other markets to them, they
During the “Gilded Age” period of American history, development of the Trans-Mississippi west was crucial to fulfilling the American dream of manifest destiny and creating an identity which was distinctly American. Since the west is often associated with rugged pioneers and frontiersmen, there is an overarching idea of hardy American individualism. However, although these settlers were brave and helped to make America into what it is today, they heavily relied on federal support. It would not have been possible for white Americans to settle the Trans-Mississippi west without the US government removing Native Americans from their lands and placing them on reservations, offering land grants and incentives for people to move out west, and the