Picture this, a girl has finally graduated college and was offered a job to become a computer engineer. She heads to work with a good mood. All she wants to do is get to know her colleagues. She arrives at work and instantly she hears mutters saying, “What is SHE doing here? Women don’t belong in this job." They say this even though she is just as capable as they are when it comes to working there. This is an example of a gender stereotype that women can’t work in STEM fields. The fact that women are being discriminated from jobs that involve science, math, technology, and engineering proves to society that men are "more capable" at higher level careers. This stereotype is a major issue in society. This ongoing process of rejecting someone …show more content…
They are portrayed to be the ones who take on tasks that use little effort. To support this in an article written by Brogan Driscoll, it states “...society’s attitude and the deeply-institutionalised assumption that women can’t” (Driscoll 1). However, even though it may seem like men take over in STEM fields and dominate the businesses, both genders have an equal amount of work. To prove this statement, an article titled “Why the STEM gender gap is overblown” it states, “When we look at the percentage of STEM bachelor’s degrees awarded to female students for the last two decades, based on NSF statistics, we find that there is no gender difference in the biosciences, the social sciences, or mathematics, and not much of a difference in the physical sciences” (Cummins 1). As can be seen from the evidence the stereotype is false because each gender has their own specific set of skills that they can build off of. In addition, it states “there is no gender difference” proving that they, in fact, have an equal amount of work. Therefore, women can do what others believe they …show more content…
This can be supported by a quote from an article titled “Women In STEM: The Truth About Working In A Male-Dominated Field And How To Get More Girls On Board”. It says, “Priya says not only does it make life unpleasant for women in employment, but it actively discourages women from entering the industry in the first place” (Driscoll 1). This is false because although it may seem like there are more men in STEM fields, most technological companies actually want to have women working for them. In support of this, an article titled “Women in STEM” states, “In fact, many companies want to hire and keep qualified women for STEM jobs” (Career Wise 1). As can be seen from the evidence presented by Careerwise, this stereotype can be debunked because it shows that women can persevere through all the hardships even when brought down. Moreover, they can now be more confident when working in engineering, and other fields of the same, since they are wanted. Finally, just because someone is brought down by something, doesn’t mean they aren’t good at their
In today’s society despite of the progress women have reached there are still barriers that are placed in society. According to author “Thirty-four percent of all families headed by women are poor: the rates are higher for African American women, Latinas and Native American women, and the rate has been increasing” (Andersen, 2015, p. 3). The previous statistics reveal that even living in a society were “equality for both genders” is usually advocated, women’s are still suffering the biggest discrimination in the workplace and in society. Even professional women working full time are being paid less than males. Moreover, professional women are continuously suffering from barriers such as the glass ceiling effect this clearly affect women from raising to upper level positions.
Women, following this ruling, would continue to be placed in lower jobs than men on the basis that they were not interested in it and had different values than men. This argument was accepted without any disagreement, continuing the long held stereotypes of women. Stereotypes of women were used as a justification for not allowing women to be placed in jobs that are normally dominated by men. These personal characteristics also seemed to be expected for all women. All women were perceived to fall under the umbrella of not wanting to take jobs that involved competitiveness, risky salary, and deterred from the normal working hours.
And it truly shocks me that even in 2015 this is still very relevant in the work place no matter where a woman finds work. At the end of the day no matter how independent the woman may be, or how high of a role she may play in her job, she will still have to go through the chain of men who can easily decide the fate of her career. And in my opinion, this way society runs wont changed. We as women will constantly be taught that men are the superior. They are the main providers and they are who should be looked at as leaders to any kind of business attributes.
Women have come a long way throughout history from the right to vote to be able to work in the workplace. They have faced a lot of discrimination but have been able to fight through each situation, but yet there are disparities between men and women in the workplace from the pay gap to positions. But why are these disparities present? Katty Kay and Clarie Shipman, writers of the article The Confidence Gap, believe the answer is confidence. This article argues that the reason why women do not pursue higher positions is due to low confidence through a pathos appeal directed at the audience, an ethos appeal given by the credibility of the authors, and a logos appeal by a variety of statistics and studies.
For example, there are a number of, more commonly international but often local as well, businesses who will not choose to put an individual in a higher up position specifically because of their sex. A person’s sex can be intimidating or uncomfortable to the opposing gender. More often than not, there are separated work worlds; a man’s and a woman’s. According to Rosalind Barnett’s research with women in the workplace, “women are said to be stuck to the "sticky floor." In contrast, when males enter female professions, they tend to quickly advance to the top of the hierarchy.
I would say that it’s true that sexism plays an important role when someone is trying to a get a job or not in this world. For example, when employees have a male manager, they start to think that he’s a leader for telling them do. However, if those same employees had a female manager who was telling tell them what to do then the employees would think she’s bossy instead of a leader. Additionally, for the most part that example is usually not criticized by people because sexism has entered their brain in a subconscious way so they don’t think it’s a problem for employees to think that a male manger is a leader while thinking a female manager is bossy. Moreover, Frye states, “For every type of occasion there are distinct clothes, gear, and accessories, hair-dos, cosmetics and scents, labeled as “ladies” or “men’s” and labeling us as females or males, and most of the time most of us choose, use, wear or bear the paraphernalia associated with our sex” (Frye, p.847).
Although women have went from 20 to 60 percent work force population, jobs are relatively gender base. Women still have mostly “pink-collar jobs” with male overhead. While America has come a long way from the past, things like gender inequality, job stratification, and unequal pay make America a patriarchal society. Some advancements show signs of America turning into an egalitarian society i.e.) women making up the majority of college students
Miller wrote about how girls lack female role models in math and science degrees, and gave strong support for it too. “In college, women earn only 12 percent of computer science degrees.” (Miller) Girls are conforming to societies’ view on what they are good or bad at before they figure it out for themselves. Women are thought to be inadequate in certain areas compared to men with little exception. The Social Construction of Gender by Judith Lorber explains modern view on gender and is similar view to Miller’s article.
According to Stephanie Coontz. In her article “The Myth of Male Decline”. The essence of this article is that in spite of all the new information of sex equality picks up in the working environment, women are not working out quite as well as reported. Coontz arguments is fundamentally that this new data with respect to women improving, and not withstanding outflanking, men in the working environment are extraordinarily overstated and that it is still basically a male-dominated world. She says that associations are simply putting this data out there trying to conceal the disparity that still exists in today's "dynamic" work environment.
Women who work full-time make only seventy-seven cents for every dollar a man who works full-time makes. This difference is known as the, ‘gender wage-gap.’ Due to this gap, full-time women employees are presented with less money and job opportunities. The stereotype behind all of this is that, ‘women aren’t worth as much as men.’ This stereotype is entirely outdated and insulting.
In all OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) and partner countries, women significantly outnumber men in education while men dominate women in industries such as engineering, manufacturing and construction in both fields of study and the labour market (Normandeau & Park, 2017). This is significant because it demonstrates that women are aptly suited for this career, and yet it is male dominated. Moreover, these fields have a higher employment rate but also has the greatest differences between the employment rates of men and women to date.
3). Furthermore, “in 2009 there were only marginally more female ‘computer programmers’ than in 1972 (20.3 percent now compared to 19.9 percent then),” however, “ after an initial increase in women’s share of the occupation to more than one-third of programmers in the late 1980s, their share has fallen consistently since 1989” (Hegewisch et al., 2010, p. 3). A sad conclusion of the report is that “occupational gender segregation for young women, aged 25 – 34 years, is now stronger than it was at the beginning of this millennium” (Hegewisch et al., 2010, p. 13). Blau, Brummund, and Yung-Hsu Liu (2013) confirmed these findings through their survey that showed trends in occupational segregation.
This is true not only in a woman’s social life, but occupational life too as exemplified by Chad Bray in “Bonuses for Bank Executives Should Be Tied to Gender Diversity, Review Says.” As expressed by Chad Bray, the financial service industry doesn’t “bring women into more senior roles,” and ultimately fail in highlighting “women out there whose skills would be an enormous asset to any firm,” (Bray). This is unacceptable especially because we live in a generation where discrimination against any person for any reason is unethical and unmoral. Instead of limiting females in the financial service industry, we need to encourage the growth
In spite of the developments that have occurred among various industries, it shows that the under-representation of women is still existent, especially in the field of science and technology. A myriad of causes and links can aggravate the gender gaps that are situated in the households, school settings, workplace environment and the actual society. Prejudice and societal perspectives have become major causes of unequal opportunities and choices that are offered to men and women in the field of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). Females, as early as childhood until adult stages, have been continuously exposed to societal issues that favor males than females. These perspectives are also inherited in the household, as parents support