Directors are the people trusted with the running of the organisation. They are expected to guide the company in the right direction both legally and financially. Being the trustees, directors are exposed to liabilities as a consequence of a breach of their duties. The liabilities of directors is stated under different laws in the Indian Constitution. Different laws and acts provide the frame work for under which directors need to act and failing which they are liable for it. Whenever any company does anything wrong or against the law, the people held accountable are the ones who were running the company at the time of committing the wrong. Directors could also be penalised for not doing their duties properly or according to the law or for …show more content…
The directors of Toyota Motors India were held responsible for the dead of one individual when the airbags in his car did not work. The case was dropped only after the company agreed to compensate the family of the deceased. Not only can lawsuits be filed against the directors by outsiders, it can be filed by the company itself and even the shareholders. A shareholder lawsuit was filed against General Motors that alleged the board of directors did not perform its duty in preventing the mounting losses from the sale of vehicles with faulty and deadly ignition switches. In Iredand a legal action against four former directors of the Irish Nationwide Building Society had to be settled out of court. This was done when a group of shareholders accused the directors for the loss incurred by the company due to the non profitable investments made by the board. In India , when a bus belonging to Orbit Transportation Company was involved in a hit and run case , the opposition parties demanded the removal and arrest of the Deputy Chief Minister of Punjab who happened to be a director of the …show more content…
Chit funds seem to be an easy way for fraudsters to make money. Most chit fund companies that are involved in scams have a similar story. The companies are started by fraudsters. They then rope in respectable people as directors in order to bring credibility to the company and attract investment. Once people invest money , they run away with all the money. Leaving the honest directors to face the lawsuits and the liabilities. This was the case with the directors of Realcon Ltd. Sometimes directors can land in trouble for smallest of mistakes. The directors of Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd experienced that first hand when an FIR was slapped against them for a cheque dishonouring
One example was the Credit Mobilier scandal where major stockholders of the Union Pacific Railroad formed the Credit Mobilier company and sold their shares to influential congressmen. These executives essentially hired themselves and stole taxpayer money, a very lucrative scandal. Scandals like the Credit Mobilier were widespread and executives from many other railroad companies often stole from their own companies. Many executives would manipulate the rail companies' stocks to profit greatly. Executives would often bribe influential politicians, and work together to profit themselves.
I think everyone on the fault because everyone did not show responsibility and did their job
Companies and corporations were also held accountable for the treatment of their employees from the formation of unions by the people. Today we see that the treatment of employees has become prioritized by some businesses and the evolution of voting
This is at any cost no matter what illegal, monstrous behaviors they engage in while at work, or how charming they are in their everyday lives outside of work they as humans have morals which they should carry with them to their jobs creating a corporation based on excellent morals verses one that has all the defining characteristics of a psychopath. The government is also responsible for the actions of psychopathic corporation because they do not mandate punishments severe enough causing the corporations to follow the rules and regulations allowing for little to no punishment for cases of corporate
OUTLINE FOR DBQ ESSAY: HOW DEMOCRATIC WAS ANDREW JACKSON? I. INTRODUCTION (PARAGRAPH #1) A. Grabber sentence Democratic spirit began B. Background information about Andrew Jackson (use bullets here) Early life/Military Born on the border of North and South Carolina in 1767. He lost both of his parents by his teenage years and married Rachel Donelson.
The contaminated water supply then resulted in the death of little children, and parents had to bury their own children. Therefore, there is no reason not to have prosecuted the two corporations as all the elements of negligence are displayed here. Consequently, both corporations whether it was intentional or accidental, committed an act of negligence. Although nothing can be done to undo the losses, both companies must have apologized and compensated the damages
Wheeler v. The Pullman Iron & Steel Co. provides the particular evaluation standard. It establishes that “The majority of shares of its stock… must be permitted to control the business of the corporation in their discretion,” so long as it does not violate the law or corruptly subvert the rights of a shareholder.” Moreover, since it is “not [the courts’] function to resolve for corporations questions of policy and business management,” they must carefully pinpoint the breaking of law or corruption. For the rest of the board, gross negligence must be proven. Such a standard requires evidence of “reckless indifference to or a deliberate disregard of the whole body of stockholders or actions which are without the bounds of reason.”
While analysts argue over whether the company will be successful or not and if the prices will be reduced, the reduction of the cost of the battery - is not the only aim of the upcoming Gigafactory, the team is already working on improving of the battery life. It is planned to increase the energy density of the batteries, thereby reducing their weight, and increased cruising range of electric vehicles. The professor at Dalhousie University Jeff Dahn is known for his work innovating lithium-ion batteries like those Tesla uses to power its Model S sedan, will collaborate with Tesla scientists (Owram, Kristine. Tesla Motors Inc Turns to Dalhousie University Professor for Help with Battery Technology). Now working on the other Project and will
E.g. the decisions taken at Enron to create off-balance-sheet transactions (disguising that failed corporation’s true, deteriorating results) • When the board overpays a CEO, it’s the shareholders who lose a share of the profits which could have been either shareholder dividends or capital gains are instead going into the CEO coffers. • Though there is a divide that executives incentive plan actually motivated them to cause their companies to perform better , if company results improved for any reason (including pure serendipity), the executives received higher pay: cause and effect didn’t matter. The company’s performance itself drove the incentive compensation—whether under the control of the CEO and his team or not. •
A) Introduction Unethical behaviors in business affect everyone since you either work in the field or are a consumer of its services. Unfortunately, almost every company usually has individuals who act unethically whether it is for their personal benefit or for the sake of the company they work for. Unethical behaviors in business might be as simple as using company property or funds for personal gain to inside trading and financial fraud. According to The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, nearly one third of business professionals feel pressured to compromise their ethical standards and are increasingly pushed towards unethical behavior. Moreover, “misconduct is common and accepted by business services professionals, the integrity of entire economic systems is at risk”, states Jordan A. Thomas, partner and chair of the Whistleblower Representation Practice at Labaton Sucharow law firm.
Kenneth Lay, Mr. Jeffrey Skilling and the company CFO, Mr. Andrew Fastow .The management level of Enron Corporation had misconduct the code of ethics and fail to performing the duties of a corporation which is telling the truth of the situation of a corporation .Instead , they tried try to hide the truth of their financial status and create a false prosperity situation and make the public believe on them in order to support their shares prices . The misconduct of code of ethics by the management level by Enron corporation has led to the another question – The ultimate responsibility of a corporation towards society ? The ultimate responsibility of a corporation is to gain profit or become a stable economic unit ?
INTRODUCTION In June 2008, TATA Motors announced the acquisition of brands Jaguar and Land Rover from the car producing giant Ford Motors. The deal was valued at US$ 2.3 billion and is considered an overall success even from intercultural perspective. On the contrary, the deal was speculated to be a huge failure as the world was entering into recession in 2008 and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) was incurring huge losses. The deal was an all cash deal with 100% acquisition of Jaguar Land Rover’s businesses.
The Honda Motor Company, Ltd. was formerly established in the great country of Japan in 1949 by Soichiro Honda and Takeo Fujisawa. The first product that was introduced to the world was called the “Dream” D-type motorcycle. The main focus that founder Soichiro Honda built the company around was to create new values and not to imitate other companies who produced similar products. In 1959, Honda Motor Company, Ltd. entered into the Unite States as the American Honda Motor Company. They settled in Los Angeles, California and was known as the first international subsidiary of Honda Motor Company,
As stated in Principle 1, The Board of Directors directs the Group’s risk assessment, strategic planning, succession planning and financial and operational management to ensure that obligations to shareholders and other stakeholders are understood and met. The board of directors has a collective responsibility for the management of the group to make sure the group is on the way to approach to their objectives while the non-Executive Directors are responsible for bringing independent judgment and scrutiny to decisions taken by the Board of Directors and providing objective challenges to management. Besides, the board of directors also function as formalising and adopting a set of Code of Ethics through the Code of Conduct as Recommendation 1.3 as stated in the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2012 to make sure its compliance, establishing an appropriate set of corporate disclosure policies and procedures and ensuring a whistleblowing mechanism is in place. The Board of Directors recognizes the importance of independence and objectivity in its decision making process. The Directors are professionals of high calibre and integrity and possess in-depth knowledge and experience of the business to enable them to discharge their duties effectively.
Brief History of Company Maruti Suzuki India Limited is one of the leading 4-wheeler automobile manufacturing company in India. It is a subsidy of Japanese manufacturer Suzuki. The company was founded in the year 1981, and the first manufacturing plant was set up in Gurgaon, Haryana. The company was previously known as Maruti Udyog Limited. It entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Japanese Automobile giant Suzuki.