They feel or do not care if there are definite studies to prove that this food causes their bodies or the environment any harm. Inorganic or non-organic farming is determined by the chemicals that are used when produce is grown. The chemicals used are all synthetic and not natural. Animals are grown with antibiotics and growth hormones to increase the speed and size at which they grow as well as increasing their milk production, which ultimately increases the farmer’s profits. Medications are used to prevent diseases in the animals and testing is done to ensure that animals are disease free before products go to the consumer.
And, the persistent of monoculture eventually leads to the loss of biodiversity. “A case can be made that the corn plant’s population explosion on places like Iowa us responsible for pushing out not only other plants but the animals and finally the people, too”(Pollan 38). The economic temptation encourages the practice of monoculture instead of running a diverse farm. Species are forced to leave and clear the land for corn plantation. However, biodiversity is vital for sustainable development because every livestock and crops are completing the food chain.
Both sides offer sound argument, however by analysing research and genetically modified food history, one can ascertain that genetically modified foods are proffering more solutions to issues in our world rather than creating them. Before one dives into the battle of good versus evil, one must first fully understand the concept of genetically modified foods. Genetically modified (GM) or genetically engineered (GE) foods have been modified in order to develop favourable characteristics. Genes are transferred from various organisms to fruit and vegetable plants and are responsible for generating favourable characteristics, such as resistance to pests and insecticides (Milano and Carol, 2007: 8-11). Many people are pro GM foods due to their positive effects such as larger yields and decreased pesticide use, but not everyone is convinced.
Also GMO can be made to be more nutritional and be modified to grow in harsh conditions which will be very beneficial in places in places such as Africa where the soil is not the best. At first I was against the production of GMOs as I was only exposed to the negative points. But after conducting research on GM foods I have changed my view pint. The advantages of GMOs have been very beneficial and products, such as Golden Rice have been accomplished its goals in improving and enhancing people’s health. GMOs are a way the human race can feed the growing population and help combat many diseases, like the soybeans vaccines, and help fight malnutrition.
As mentioned before, the most common use of GM engineering for our foods is the insertion of genes that make crops tolerant to pesticides. To put it simply, farmers can spray as much pesticides and herbicides on their crops to rid pests without having to worry about harming their crops. However, we should not forget that the increased spraying of pesticides on the food that we eat also increases our exposure to pesticides. This is through either the consumption of their leaves and seeds where pesticides have been applied, or through the uptake of contaminants by the plants from soil and from water that has been exposed to pesticides. This is of course detrimental to our health.
GM crops are grown almost on every continent to upsurge the proficiency of growing certain crops with higher yields as a way to counteract world hunger. The acreage of GM crops increasing worldwide (Refer to Appendix A) serves as a testament to the main objective of genetic modification; to produce crops and livestock that have valuable traits that do not occur naturally in a given
Another argument against GM foods, is that the production of modified foods could lead to new toxins or allergens that could be hazardous to both humans and animals. Higher cancer rates have also been linked to GM foods, resulting in more extensive research into whether genetically modified foods could carry varied types of carcinogens. Despite these concerns there are still some scientists who believe the fears against GM foods are outdated. Even with all this in mind, scientists and researchers cannot argue that there are still some benefits to GM foods such as, larger crop production, bigger produce, longer growing seasons, and much more. To help quell these concerns many scientists believe further oversight and testing of GM foods should
Genetic engineering is a potentially and powerful very dangerous tool. To alter the succession of nucleotides of the DNA can have extremely ill. Genetic modification should be banded by law as its future is unknown, genetically modified food in unsafe and it is against humans’ rights (unethically). Nobel Prize winning, George Wald Harvard professor and biologist, wrote in 1976: “Recombinant DNA technology [genetic engineering] faces our society with problems unprecedented not only in the history of science, but of life on the Earth.” According to a study, it is 83% risky. In addition, the consequences problems may not appear for many years, which will make huge health problems. “Germline genome alterations are permanent and heritable, so very, very careful consideration needs to be taken in advance of such applications.” (Carroll, 2015).
Ziad Abdulghafour Genetically modified food 0014502 For centuries, Farmers have been cross-breeding plants to grow the most profitable and highest quality of food. Today this field of cross breeding plants has been revolutionized to a whole new level. Along with great discoveries comes concerns from consumers. Recently, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have replaced our diet with genetically manipulated foods, which affects human health as well as local communities. Farmers who choose to sustain the traditional way of farming techniques prefer to grow organic produce over genetically engineered crops while maintaining a successful business.
Biotechnology Biotechnology binds cellular and bio molecular processes that develop technologies and products that help improves the health of our planet and our lives. Modern biotechnology provides products and technologies to combat debilitating diseases and cure diseases, feed the hungry, reduce environmental footprint, use less and cleaner energy and help to have a safer, cleaner and more efficient industrial manufacturing processes. Millions of farmers around the world use agricultural biotechnology to increase yields, to prevent damage from insects and pests and reduce impact on the environment. Genetic engineering is the direct manipulation of an organism’s genome using biotechnology. (Margaret Rouse, May 2007) Golden Rice Golden
Then that answer is a genetically modified organism or food. “Are organisms that have undergone some changes to their DNA through genetic engineering” (Reference). Which means it is a food that has had something about its appearance, taste, smell, and much more changed. This isn 't a natural thing to happen either, so why put so much work into changing something, and does that mean it 's dangerous? So you would think how could gmos be dangerous?
By genetically modifying foods, scientists are able to create products with better nutritional values, flavors, and textures. As stated in “Genetically Modified Foods,” “Regular rice is not very nutritious, so scientists have genetically modified rice plants.” The modified plants produce proteins that give rice additional iron and vitamins. Essentially, there are many benefits when particular crops are altered, which strongly contradicts Hawthorne’s view of scientists. In both “The Birthmark” and “Rappaccini’s Daughter”, scientists attempt to control nature resulting in severe consequences. However, according to many sources individuals involved in biotechnology have produced crops with enhanced nutritional value and flavor.
The prices of the crop would be lower as well since there would be a larger yield. An example of this is corn, a common GMO. The manipulation of genes that have formed genetically modified corn has allowed it to become widely available to consumers because of its increase in numbers and decrease in price. If the genetically modified strain of cabbage would be more expensive, the economy and social aspect would be affected in a negative way since people would be unable to afford it and would no longer be able to eat cabbage. The final factor that would need to be taken into consideration is the environmental impact of a GMO.