SOC 3200 Tyler Blaize 6/2/15 In today’s world there are two countries that are similar but have their differences that separate it from the rest of the major cities in the world. These two cities are London, UK and New York City, NY. These two cities share many similarities in a different way, but is shared and a problem for many other cities, such as obesity, homelessness, race discrimination and gentrification. The factors that separate these two cities are how is the problem being handled and which city does a better job of trying to fix the problem. The city of modern day London compared to the modern day city of New York City has a lot of string differences when it comes to living standards in terms of pricing of the necessities, …show more content…
In areas like Park Slope, which was going through the gentrification process before the other parts of Brooklyn, was seen as an area with a lot “potential” to the middle class that was looking to work closer to the city (4). New York City also gave tax redemptions to people who lived in these areas or use these areas for private interest (4). People hearing this in the suburbs will slowly start to look to buy these houses in these areas since they will get tax redemptions and a potential to sell the houses in these areas for more they purchased making them more money. This will peak the interest for people to make more money rather than making a more livable city for all classes. This is seen in the borough of Barnsbury in London where landlords were starting to see tenants as unprofitable. The landlords started to emptying the properties and selling the properties as privately owned properties rather than having tenants (4). This lead to a 21.9% increase in private ownership of the properties and a 58% decrease of tenant rented property (4). These two areas did not only get support from people looking to make an investment but also got a lot of support from the government. The government gave these areas grants and low interest loans to fix up the neighborhoods and rehabilitate the houses.
One way the cities are different is the size
As he was listing the different characteristics of London that made it so worthy, he seized this opportunity to compare the country to the city, and ultimately point out the lack of wonder and amazement that he finds in the country.
After the American Revolution, New York was decimated and were in a state of worry with a dwindling population while Philadelphia and Boston were confident and ready for change. However, the tide turned when the “population burgeoned” and became twice the size of any rivals New York had (Jackson and Dunbar 101). Diversity played a main key in the rise of the New York economy after the American Revolution. New Yorkers, as did the Dutch and British, places less importance on “difference” and more on innovation and risk taking than their rivals. People who came to New York from all over the world were excited of having a better chance to become rich than they would have in their home country or in the other cities nearby.
Gentrification has been fairly a new trend, it indicates the process of renewal, and it’s rebuilding which is associated with the overwhelming flow of middle-class or wealthy people into this deteriorating communities. Which often displace the poorer people of that community and resulting in an increase in property values. Gentrification is usually thought as being a positive economic development, but many is frowned upon by many as well as myself. This does start the renewal process that cleans up the community. Often than not, leads to the increase in sales in housing, taxes, and individuals rent.
Neoliberalization’s propagation of health inequity in urban rebuilding processes and social movements against them: Baltimore’s story This essay will discuss how neoliberal processes during redevelopment sustain and increase health inequities. It will highlight key neoliberal processes in urban redevelopment and examples of their impact on economic, political, and institutional social capital and subsequent public health effects. Examples of social movements challenging several neoliberal processes will be provided as one path toward changing the roots of health inequities. Introduction Too often neighborhoods which have been historically disinvested and demonized become prime real estate targets for development with the expectation
Gentrification is the process of renovating and improving a house or district so that it conforms to middle-class taste. Real Estate investors usually take low-income places that they feel have a chance to prosper economically, and turn them into areas that attract the middle and upper class workers. In doing so they feel like the low-income areas will be safer and more appealing, attracting more people to visit and live there. An improvement to a poor district sounds beautiful, but is gentrification as great as it’s sought out to be? Many residents have their doubts about gentrification due to the idea that the costs of their living will go up and they will be driven out of their neighborhoods.
Shadowshaper by Daniel Jose Older is about Sierra Santiago a teen living in Brooklyn. Sierra is an artist and has recently started a big mural on the side of a building as summer starts. While working on it she looks across to the mural on the wall adjacent and notices its fading and the expression seems to be changing to an angry man them she sees a tear fall from the eye of the man in the mural and she knows something is wrong, and that something really weird is going on. The Mural is greatly pushed by Manny and her grandfather to get it done fast to help save everyone because someone is coming for them. Sierra doesn’t know much about what is after them but follows her grandfather’s directions that starts a whole adventure for her summer
Other scholars have documented that when communities go through preservation periods, this may also be followed by reinvestment and gentrification (Lees et al. 2013). However, wealthy people do not just go around with the intention of displacing families in communities. Besides greedy landowners, there are other mechanisms that factor into gentrification and displacement. Be it a vibrant ethnic culture, a booming art scene, or trendy restaurants, creative factors that welcome diversity attract outside community members to either participate or invest (Florida 2003). Even if heritage, art, and restaurants may have been created for current residents, people with more financial mobility are able to participate in cultural consumption at their
The government had to subsidize housing projects using taxpayer’s money. Thus, maintaining status quo is inefficient and against the Constitutional right of all Americans to have better housing facilities. 2. Intensify enforcement of the housing
Being that I am from Washington, D.C., a city that has had its fair share of gentrification, as well as always having an interest in cities and real estate, there would be a time where I would have to take a position on the topic. As a business finance major in college and coming from a family who has worked in the finance and real estate world, gentrification has been a recurring topic on my mind. While gentrification is a controversial and subjective topic with benefits and detriments, both of which I have listed above, I believe that gentrification does more bad than good. I am against gentrification for many reasons, one of which is the displacement of a whole community, the majority if which is people who look like me.
Miami and New York both are wonderful places to visit. New York, it is one of the most populated cities in the U.S for their large buildings and Miami is one of the state most popular vacation spots. Although there are several similarities between Miami and New York, there are many obvious differences between them in their economy, entertainment, and cultures. New York and Miami are well known for their economy. Living in Miami or New York is extremely luxurious.
One of these differences is competition, since bigger cities have a higher population there will always be more competition to claim higher ranking in sports tournaments or business management and even parking spots. Compared to a smaller city there will be less competition leading to a slower pace of growth – just like how the more money you put into a savings account, the more interest you will receive. This also demonstrates the “small fish, big pond” effect, if one two people are at the same skill level but surrounds themselves in a group of people that are more skilled than them they will have a lower sense of accomplishment, in contrast to if they were surround by people who are less skilled which gives one a better sense of
In the middle of the 18th century London became the biggest city of the world as the “British Empire” with its numerous colonies worldwide got formed. Moreover, the population registered an increase of 700 percent within 100 years from one million inhabitants to almost 7 million people. On account of London’s growth it became the world capital regarding trading and finance. Immigrants from the colonies of the United Kingdom were able to move to the capital city and made it to a cultural diverse city. (Ellrich & Neuhaus, 2012)
Besides both cities with minimum 100000 population. CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE
The differences of rural and urban areas are their facilities, education, living costs, but the similarities between village and city are in their language, religion, laws, and government. One obvious difference is the facilities. City life has more facilities and opportunities to progress life. People in urban areas are integrated with technology that makes their lives much easier.