In “Shooting an Elephant”, author and narrator George Orwell thinks back to the time that he served as an officer in Burma, where during his five years of service, he is constantly bullied by the civilians he is supposed to protect. Orwell is ruefully continuing his days among the people when suddenly an elephant gets loose in the town, killing one person and trampling a few food carts. As an officer, it is Orwell’s responsibility to protect the people, and so he sets out after the loose elephant, rifle in tow with a growing crowd behind him. It is because of that crowd of people, with thousands of eyes boring into his back with anticipation, does he realize that he has to shoot the elephant. It takes five direct hits to take it down, and even after multiple other direct hits, “...it took him half an hour to die.” The elephant’s death left Orwell ashamed and torn; on paper, he had done his duty as an officer but deep down …show more content…
When his parents find out about said cup, they are mad, but they tell the child that he needs to tell them the truth about what happened. If the child fesses up and admits that he broke it, his punishment may be lessened for telling the truth, although there will still be a punishment. If they keep quiet or lie, he might get a punishment anyway. This example relates to Orwell’s situation because just as the child may hide the fact he broke the cup, Orwell decides to hide his real reason for killing the elephant. Both the child and Orwell are guilty even though no one else knows, and will continue to be guilty even if they gave in and told the truth to anyone else. Even if the child tells his parents the truth, he will still be punished in some way. Telling the truth or lying does not distract from the wrongdoing; both the child and Orwell are still responsible for the misdeed they
Zachary Conners SUNY – Eng. 12 Mrs. O’Malley December 15, 2014 “Shooting an Elephant” is a persuasive rhetorical piece written by George Orwell used to describe Orwell’s feelings about imperialism. Orwell uses pathos, logos, and ethos to convey his feelings towards imperialism and how destructive it can be. Born 1903, George Orwell, novelist, essayist, and critic, was best known for his novels Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty- Four. Son of a British servant, Orwell spent most of his days in India, where his father had been stationed.
Orwell's writing makes the writer feel as if they are the narrator, and the fate of the elephant is in their hands. They experience the same mental battle as the protagonist. In Trial By Fire by David Grann, Todd Willingham is accused of arson and murdering his three daughters. While evidence by Vasquez, the lead
Even though Orwell did commit the crime of shooting an elephant, throughout the story he used ethos, pathos, and figurative language to convince the audience if given the opportunity he would never shoot an elephant again because the elephant represents the innocence of people. First and foremost, Orwell establishes his ethos. As stated in Everything’s an Argument, ethos is described as the author's credibility. He establishes his ethos right from the beginning of the story when he states he works for the British but he despises them.
He says, “...I was very glad that the coolie had been killed; it put me legally in the right and it gave me a sufficient pretext for shooting the elephant.”, because he tried to make himself feel better about killing the elephant by saying that the elephant deserved to die for killing a man, thus Orwell said that it was kind of like pleading self-defense. He even makes up another excuse saying that he did it because his people were starving, so he apparently also killed the elephant so it would be used to provide food and material for the people.
Well known author and journalist, George Orwell, in his essay, Shooting an Elephant, describes his experiences as a Policeman in Moulmein, Burma during European Imperialism. Orwell’s purpose is to convey the ideal that what is right and what is accepted don’t always align. He adopts a remorseful tone in order to convey to the reader the weight of his actions. By looking at George Orwell’s use of imagery and figurative language, one can see his strongly conflicting opinions on Imperialism. Orwell begins his essay, Shooting an Elephant, by explaining the actions of the Burmese people and by expressing his contempt for imperialism.
This narrative piece is an effective expository technique that describes the narrator’s thoughts and tone. Orwell uses oxymoron such as “grinning corpse” and paradox phrases such as “the story always sounds clear enough at a distance, but the nearer you get to the scene of events the vaguer it becomes”. Another paradox statement is shown in “I perceived this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys”. Orwell’s decisions were briskly altered as he was deciding on whether to kill the elephant or not. His mind altered from “I ought not to shoot him” to “I had got to do it” and also to “But I did not want to shoot the elephant”.
(Orwell 3). The ideas learned from this quote is that shooting the elephant would embrace the people, it would make the people support the officer and give him the respect he deserves. This is
Throughout “Shooting An Elephant” , Orwell’s narrative style brings out internal and external conflicts that are relatable in society today. The narrator faces multiple internal and external conflicts. One external conflict being the Burmese and how they mock him because he is a representative of the British Empire, but he will do what it takes to show them he is not a fool. "I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool.
There are numerous themes in this short story such as British imperialism and colonial resentment however the most prominent theme in this story is fear of humiliation and the effect peer- pressure has on an individual. The setting of Burma helps work with this theme as it provides an area for the plot to take place and develop. After marching miles to the destination of the elephant, a crowd had surrounded George Orwell and encourages Orwell to kill the elephant. George Orwell is compelled to kill the once ravaging elephant due to the fact that Orwell wants to avoid looking like a fool. George Orwell is willing to sacrifice his role of doing the right thing and fulfilling the Burmese wishes in order to save himself from
The narrator experiences three conflicts: one with the British Empire because of its unjust occupation of Burma, one with the Burmese because of their mockery of him as a representative of the British Empire, and one with himself in his struggle with his conscience and self-image. In literary terms, the first two are external conflicts and the third is an internal conflict. All three conflicts complicate his ability to make objective, clear-headed decisions. In Orwell’s story Shooting an elephant, three major things come up; he realizes who actually is in power, how he saw the British rule ending, and how he was rooting for the Burmese people.
Reading Response “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell is a story about what he went through when he was a policeman in Burma, and why he shot an elephant, “solely to avoid looking [like] a fool.” “[He] was hated by a large numbers of people,” and in a way tortured for things that he didn’t even understand what he was doing. He perceived that him and his other european cohorts were doing the right thing, but he also hated that fact that they were there. At first I assumed that this essay was going to be about just killing an elephant for fun and how it made him feel.
The older men agreed with his actions and the younger men did not. Orwell still felt a bit of relief. If it wasn’t for the elephant killing the coolie to justify his actions, then every bit of killing that animal would have been to not look like a
Suddenly one individual's sins are placed upon everyone's shoulders, inflicting the repercussions of the guilty onto all those representing the US military. Orwell experiences this in a slightly different situation by being the one forced to act on behalf of the Empire. He is the one the set that expectation for the other police officers stationed in Burma. In Orwells essay he paints a picture of being forced to make a decision he doesn't moraley support because of the power he was to represent.
When the elephant escaped from its chains, Orwell was called upon to deal with the elephant and had to make the decision whether to shoot the elephant or not. Orwell shooting the escaped elephant represents how resistance to oppression is dealt with under imperialism by using
At this point, the story slows as the narrator is forced to battle with himself over the life of the elephant. He eventually comes to the decision to shoot the elephant. In the end, the narrator reflects on the consequences of shooting the elephant and decides that what he did was right, even if he only did it to preserve his pride (Orwell). Orwell’s short story covers the narrator’s mental battles well and uses characterization and symbolism to convey the effects of imperialism on individuals and how the pressure of a group ’s wants can lead someone to a decision that is immoral.