In President Bush’s speech to the public on the night of September eleventh 2001 he showed that his point of view was from the perspective that he was trying the comfort the American public. In the first part of his speech he showed and supported this when he said, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed.
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair also had to use their speeches to turn the world from terrorism to a more positive course. To achieve this goal, both Bush and Blair had to employ tone and rhetorical strategies in order to appeal to their audiences. The tone of a piece of writing is often seen as the attitude the author has towards a particular subject or audience, and it is shown through the diction or viewpoint of the writer on a particular subject. It can affect different people in varying ways like making people feel sad or devastated. The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, were some of the most devastating events that have ever taken place on United States soil.
This line is not only a way of convincing the American people that if they stand with him they stand with justice, but to convince another major group that America was just in their fight for freedom; according to David Armitage of Harvard University this convinced British enemies to fight with America, a crucial and needed assistance for the brutal path ahead (Armitage). In Jefferson’s final words he calls for a complete break away from the Kingdom of Great Britain. His final line in which he states, “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor”, carries some of the most powerful diction in the entire speech and really brings home the final point that they are not doing this
Greenwald states that president Bush had Manichean beliefs about the wars, which is the belief that the world is divided into two separate opposing spheres of good vs. evil, and the U.S. was going to bring good "Democracy" to the rest of the world (Greenwald, pg.46). In a speech President Bush gave in 2002 in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Bush states "Either you 're with us or you 're against us, Either you 're on the side of freedom and justice or you aren 't." (Greenwald, pg.39). Greenwald uses this quote to clearly illustrate President Bush 's Manichean beliefs and his views as President. Greenwald uses quotes like that and numerous others throughout his book to illustrate his view point about the Bush
In his address he knows that he is the first president and that the he has shared responsibility of the president and Congress to preserve and start tradition. Washington realizes that since he is president he is called to help preserve "the sacred fire of liberty.” Washington knows that he must help preserve the republican form of government so he can create new tradition. Washington really just wanted to create a mantel and tradition for other future presidents after him to follow and rely
Bush and his administration in reference to the United States of America post-9/11 policies. to place it more accurately, he argues that the Bush administration skillfully used the shock that affected the country once the fear attacks, so as to attain its own goals, as well as the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The author stands on the bottom that the United States of America authorities used mass media as means that of pressure on the mass audience. Moreover, media served as suggests that of psychological pressure on Americans since they accelerated the worry that flooded minds and souls of American individuals. At a similar time, the author implies that American’ reasoning skills were much unfit due to the overwhelming power of mass media that bombarded the consciousness of American citizens with terrible news and even additional terrible forecasts regarding the longer term of the USA (Gore, 2007).
He shows the opposing view, “shall we try argument?”, and goes on to explain that they have “…been trying that for the last ten years” (Henry). Henry provides views from those that would oppose him and says why they are wrong. This makes the audience support him even more because they will see why the opponent’s viewpoint is wrong and he is right. He shows that they have run through all the different ways that they could stop the war and have no other choice but to initiate war between colonists and the British. It satisfies the colonists who want to fight back and opens the eyes of the President and Delegates to the fact that the British leave no other
The British Prime Minister, Tony Blair,in his speech, following September 11, 2001 America United States ,sheds light about terrorists and unity.Blair’s purpose is to unite Americans citizens as one .Blair’s speech was effective in persuading all Americans that unity is the answer against terrorist or any other issue because of pathos,logos,and allusion. Blair effectively uses pathos in many different ways throughout his speech to impact the reader 's emotions that will forever stay in ones heart.For instance, in order to express the ¨suffering¨,¨terror¨,and ¨horror¨ that unfolded after the terrorist attack .Incidentally, ¨watching the horror unfold,imagining the almost unimaginable suffering¨(11 and 12).The readers will gain an image on
War propaganda is created to exploit the publics attitude and their view towards war. This piece of war propaganda was designed to captivate anyone who looks at it and make them reflect on the war. It evokes emotion towards the issue without creating a verbal discussion and influences people to sympathize with what they the artists illustrate in this case, those fighting for Iraq. This specific piece is called War propaganda by Marc Pageau. In 2003 the United States president George W. Bush along with the United Kingdoms prime minister Tony Blair united to disarm Iraq of weapons, end Saddam Hussein’s sustenance for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people.
The Utilitarian approach to terrorism and torture asks to “choose the action that will produce the greatest benefits and the least harm” and provide “the greatest good” for the innocent and the masses (Velasquez, et al. 1996). In the case of terrorist attacks and mass murders officials must know what lengths they are willing to go to protect their people and the rest of the world. The war on terrorism is one that The United States has been dedicated to fighting since the attacks of 9/11. Our focus needs to be on stopping the individual terrorists of the world and finding the information we need in order to ultimately end these attacks on civilization and this war on terror.
After this horrible act of terrorism the president of the United States gave a speech addressing the nation. This speech, George W. Bush’s 9/11 Address to the Nation, was remarkable for its use of metaphors, anaphoras, and allusions. George W. Bush’s use of metaphors gave hope and determination to the citizens of America.
The aim was to encourage Americans not to let terrorism destroy their sense of protection, but to unite and rally. His response to his pivoting moment in history is widely represented within the Bush Doctrine. The Bush Doctrine already had played out in the Clinton presidency with tensions with Saddam Hussein, and earlier in 2001 when Bush made the decision to withdraw from “Kyoto Protocol,” for the sake of saving money despite the concerns greenhouse gases were imposing on the environment. In regards to 9/11, America was set to go after any nation that assisted or supported any sort of terrorism yet aiding those in their reliefs for prevention. This would lead to the invasions of Afghanistan to counterattack Al-qaeda, the terrorist group that claimed responsibility for the
It helped influence the government to secure and prevent the violence, and by them catching a lot of information from the al-Qaida team and how they had set everything up to keep on doing bombings, etc. It helped the economy by the Obama Care. The government response to the threat of terrorism after the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center contribute to the success of the 9/11 attacks was that they took it seriously, they tightened up security, for example like Donald Trump he’s trying to take down the borders and deport people who don’t belong here. My estimation from the video that was compelling and interesting to me was how they got the guys from the al-Qaida team and they got to see and find everything on the computer that they had left when the apartment they were in was catching on fire, everything that was on the computer was every place they had a place for bombing, so it was actually interesting seeing their set up and everything they had left behind. My other interest from the video was how I got to see all the actions after the planes hit the buildings and what had happened to the buildings and how they