In New York City, 1.5 million were paid to 8,320 kids for good test scores and this experiment did not work. In Chicago a different Model, these kids earned for their grades they attended school more often and got better grades. This was two accomplishments. These students did not do so well on the standardized test at the end of the school year. In Washington the kids did better on the standardized reading test. These students got paid on routine basis for small accomplishments, for attendance and good behavior this seemed to lead to more learning for
One day, a friend told me that he gets $15 for every A he gets in school. When I asked my mom why I don’t get paid money for my grades, she told me to search it up and see the side effects. I saw the results and now conclude that kids shouldn’t get paid money for good grades. Some major reasons are that kids get pressure to inflate grades, it messes with the development of the child’s intrinsic motivation, and it lowers academic scores in the long run. We need a strong country and giving children money for their grade s will not help. Here are some reasons why. From pressure to inflate grades, to messing with the development of a child’s intrinsic motivation, to children getting lower academic grades in the long run, kids shouldn’t get paid
Being a student athlete is hard wherever you go. With practice, games, team activities, and not to mention school there is always a lot on their plate. Being a student athlete especially at a Division 1 level is considered a job based on how much time is invested in it. Since it is a job why not pay the clients who work very hard for you? Universities makes millions off student athletes ever year, in 2008 Alabama was first in total revenue made by their athletic department totaling over $123 million in tickets, donations, and media rights and many other categories. Having high revenue, you will also have high expenses, as Alabama once again was first with over $123 million due to paying coaches, recruiting, and other things (ESPN, 2008). This
In the story “Grades and Money”. Steven Vogel, a college professor teaching philosophy at a small private college in the Midwest talks about students worrying about getting better grades, rather than learning the material. He discusses how back when he was in school students never talked about what their grade was in a class, and now that’s all kids talk about. He gives many examples of students being open about their grades. In the story he states “ openness about grades is probably healthier than the kind of highfalutin’ squeamishness we exhibited-but rather to explain the difficulty I feel in really understanding grades, in grasping what exactly they are and what they are for”. (Grades are Money pg2)
Imagine you are one of the best athletes in your college. But what if you didn’t have enough money to continue school and most of your time were spent in a college sport? You wouldn’t have enough time for working and studying. There are some student-athletes who are actually struggling right now with this problem. What should the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) do? Due to their hard work, time and risk of injuries, college athletes should be paid.
Even though it will cost more money for the school, In my opinion this could help the school because more people will want to go. If more and more people know that the athletes get paid more students will attend the school. This could help the school get more money for the school even though they are now paying their athletes. Athlete will work harder and harder to get better at the sport especially if they are getting paid. It will help students get their scholarship and will help pay for many good things. Some students are having trouble in college
Students shouldn't have to pay for college, should they? No they shouldn't. Many smart kids who are more likely to succeed have little money and cannot afford college. More kids would go to college, also students would have more freedom to choose what they really wanted to do. College should be free for everyone for the kids with less money, it would help some actually go and be successful in life and they would have more freedom to choose what they want to do.
First of all, students should get paid for having good grades because money for grades provides real, career-like rewards. Hers is a quote from a website called GreatSchools.org. “ Cash for grades programs may jump start motivation by providing real world rewards for their effort and performance. Proponents liken these rewards to an adult getting a raise or bonus for performing well on the job.” This leads to children getting to know what having a job is like early on in their life. Like the article said, cash for grades is almost equivalent
I believe that the minimum wage in Pennsylvania should increase from $7.50 to $10.00. Why so? I feel as though teenagers, specifically freshmen in college should earn a more decent pay whether they work at a typical job, such as Burger King and Dunkin Donuts. More like fast food restaurants comply within this topic. I specifically aim for freshmen, or even college students because they need a well, decent pay whether they are struggling with financial problems, such as the need to pay for their tuitions, textbooks, and school supplies! As a first-year college student, I relate to this significantly because money does play a big role in society nowadays. It’s always been like that for years now. I feel as though we need a change at least with
First of all, students should not be paid for good grades due to not needed pressure. The NEA claims : many teachers say, “Paying students for good grades leads to practical problems in their classrooms, including pressure to inflate grades and conflict with students and parents.” This means students are more likely to be in bad moods and have bad relationships with parents and classmates. If some kids get money and the rest don’t, arguments will break out. In a classroom, students are supposed to be respectful to each other in order to have and efficient working environment. The effect of this is, students will be stressed and annoyed or angry with them, if unable to raise test scores. To sum up, students will feel not needed pressure.
The article,”Teenagers’ Work Can Have Downsides” written by Jerald G. Bachman, discusses many advantages and disadvantages of working as a teenager. Although, Bachman has good reasonings for both sides, teenagers should be able work. There are good outcomes that come from teenagers having a job, they can learn many useful skills that they can use in the future. They could be saving up money to help pay for college. Having a job can help students become more responsible.
“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” -Nelson Mandela. If a person does not get a proper education, they may find their adult life filled with more challenges than their college-educated peers. Americans should go to college because they will make more money, and mature mentally - making life easier for them.
Schools are just like jobs. The boss expects the workers to stay on task and do their work well. Teachers want students to work hard and also do their work with effort. If schools really want students to succeed, shouldn’t they be paid? Paying students motivate them to work hard to learn the criteria. How do schools motivate them? With money. Students should be paid for their grades because it will teach them about the real world, level out the playing field, and raise graduation rates.
Parents and teachers in highschool make it seem like the only way to get a good job and make a living is to go to college and get a degree. In the past this might have been true and that the only way to have a solid future. College education is not worth the cost because it can be vastly expensive, create a large amount of debt, and leave the person unprepared for the job.
In some, information on student achievement is published in league tables, and sanctions, including monetary rewards, are attached to performance for schools and teachers. The use of monetary rewards, however, has proved controversial, and usually has not lasted very long. Furthermore, rewarding successful schools at the expense of increasing resources to schools that are failing would not contribute to overall school improvement. Non-monetary rewards (working in an environment conducive to learning, seeing positive results in student learning, or responding to parent pressure) can be motivating.