Introduction: ‘Ghost Boy’ is a heartrending, inspirational memoir of a young South African boy, Martin Pistorius who at the age of 12 years was suddenly afflicted with a rare disease which paralyzed his whole body. For 2 years he was almost in a coma but after that he was mentally awake but for the next ten years no one realized it.
Overall impression: The doctors’ diagnosis was that Martin was in a persistent vegetative state when in reality both his brain and his eyes were active, thus putting him in a condition where he underwent immense trauma and anguish. The change came with the arrival of Verna, a caregiver who believed that he was able to understand but not express himself and what followed was a miracle. Though he still cannot speak, he leads a busy life as a web designer based in England and is married. The lucidly written book portrays the loneliness and hopelessness of his condition. Yet, underlying it one can find hope, in his family’s attitude and his innate strength in the face of such despair. What stands out in the book is Martins’ total confidence in God with whom he held conversations in his mind as he
…show more content…
This is a question which comes to the mind when one is suffering from debilitating, terminal illness where there is absolutely no hope of recovery and is one of the most difficult decisions to take. It is often taken after discussions with family members, doctors, social workers and sometimes religious preachers. I feel that if the medical condition is irreversible, i.e. there is no chance of ever becoming better and such illness is a burden on the family, it is better to let go. Though euthanasia or mercy killing, sometimes known as assisted suicide is illegal in many countries, it is still a viable option in such cases. Another option is withdrawal of life support which leads to natural death. However, if there is even a remote possibility of improvement, one should prefer life to
Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health What is the value of a life? Do family members always have the patients’ best interest in mind when making medical decisions? Who should ultimately make the decision of life or death for patients that will never leave a permanent vegetative state? Lester and Joyce Cruzan faced an issue no parent ever wants to face after their daughter, Nancy was in a horrific car accident that left her in a persistent vegetative state.
“The real reason for not committing suicide is because you always know how well life gets again after the hell is over.” People are unable to realize how their situation can be resolved better than having to kill themselves. Terminally ill patients are notorious for taking their lives before they can realize the mistake they are making. They believe that it is best for their situation, however, there are multiple reasons for why they should reconsider their actions before something terrible happens. Doctor assisted suicides should not be allowed because of the effects it has on the deceased loved ones and how more terminally ill patients are overcoming their disabilities.
Death with Dignity Everyone deserves to determine their time of death. Of course under the giving circumstances a terminal illness. This was the case of Brittany Maynard who at the age of 29 was diagnosed with brain cancer. Her cancer consisted of a partial craniotomy and a partial resection of her temporal lobe.
In cases like these, legalizing euthanasia would present it as a viable solution, and in their distress, the family members may selfishly consider it to alleviate the financial burden the patient may
I agree with the idea of assisted suicide, because if someone is suffering to the point that they can no longer care for themselves. They may feel that it is there time to go and that person should be able to make that decision. Although some believe that assisted suicide is wrong that should be left to the person that is going to die or the person
Assisted suicide is a tough decision that comes down to what you morally believe in. The author of the article “The right to die” believes that doctor assisted suicide should be legalized in more states than just the four that it is. He approaches the topic from an ethical standpoint, stating its rights and wrongs. This essay will include reasons as to why assisted suicide should be legalized, how the system of death should work and if it is morally right. Only in four states is assisted suicide mandated by state law: Oregon, Washington, Vermont and California.
Physician assisted suicide is currently legal in five U.S. states with fifteen more states reviewing it within the next year making it an important topic to look at morally and ethically. Physician assisted suicide is the act of an individual killing themselves with the help of a physician, usually by taking a lethal dose of a drug. It is important to point out that the patient first has to request it and they complete the ultimate act. This differs from euthanasia where the physician is the one who ultimately causes the death. Physician assisted suicide is requested because the patient is enduring tremendous pain and suffering which can only be ended with their death (Vaughn 293).
Not only does it give physician, who is still human, too much power and room for human error, it is religiously and morally incorrect, violates the Hippocratic oath, and above devalues the precious gift of life. As stated earlier, treatment is possible and should be looked into instead of giving up. Donating your final moments to research and to help aid in discovering different treatment options, could give a child a chance to live that is diagnosed with the same illness. There will always be pros and cons to this subject but my opinion stands. A person has to right to refuse or accept treatment, but should not be able to take their own lives by assistance of a
Many people have countless opinions on this topic. They range from saying it is murder, to saying if the person is suffering to much and wants to pass then let them pass. Others may say that it depends on what side you are one. How would you feel if you had a family member that could do
Living her life as a quadriplegic has left her severely depressed, she feels as though her condition is a burden on her family, and as though her life is worthless. These feelings are affecting her quality of life and therefore she is considering legally terminating her life and wishes to be euthanized. The ethical dilemma is if she should be granted permission to legally terminate her life, or should she not be allowed to terminate her own life and continue living her life in her current condition. She could end her own life and leave behind a family that cares for her, or she could get counseling and medication to get her through her depression that may help her feel as if her life is still worth living.
In the defense of Physician Assisted Suicide, a wide publicly talked about topic, it should be a choice every terminally ill patient receives. Physician Assisted suicide is when a patient is terminally ill and has no chances of recovering. The patient themselves can make the decision, with the help from their physician, to get lethally injected and end their life reducing and ending the pain. In America each state has a little over 3,000 patients that are terminally ill contact an advocacy group known as the Compassion and Choices to try to reduce end-of- life suffering and perhaps hasten their death. Physician Assisted Suicide shouldn’t be looked at as suicide, but as ending the pain and suffering from an individual whose life is going to be taken away anyway.
Imagine having to endure so much pain and suffering for a majority of your life that you would just want it all to end. Well, there is a way one can stop their own pain and suffering and it is called euthanasia. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The act may only be done solely to those diagnosed with terminal illnesses such as cancer, aids, and heart disease. Many people agree with the idea of euthanasia as it can help those who are suffering be stripped of all the pain they are enduring.
Life or Death Who chooses death over life? Sometimes we have to make this decision over a loved one when there is no hope for their recovery. It would be incredibly hard to make this life or death decision on another human being and twice as hard when it is someone we love. The author discusses the argument of this controversial topic of sustaining life at any cost or dying peacefully as an ethical issue. An ethicist, a person who specializes in or writes on ethics, can provide valuable discernment with respect to right and wrong motives or actions.
From an economic standpoint, euthanasia is a brilliant alternative. Though many see it as unethical, it may be relieving for the victims to know that once they’ve passed they’re no longer considered burdens to their families. Though harsh, keeping a terminally ill person alive for a year costs no less than $55,000, dying in a dignified way is their last resort when they know their condition is not going to improve. Many patients with incurable diseases have stated that the lengthy and expensive time and operations granted by their families are not worth the few extra months they get of spending time on Earth.
Imagine that your mom is very, very sick. She has the choice to keep fighting the sickness or to give up and go through euthanasia. The process of euthanasia involves a lethal injection in the body which kills the body. It’s kind of like when a vet has to put a dog down. While many people think this process is a way of relieving pain, the termination of someone else’s life is not ethical since it lowers the value of life and is not a natural way of death.