Ghost In The Shell Analysis

773 Words4 Pages
In Ghost in the Shell (2017) under the right representation of the main character known as Major; the film would have avoided the yellow peril stereotype. Whereas the remake included a multi-cultural cast, there were only three characters (Hairi, Takeshi, and Togusa) of Asian descent that played in supporting roles but the remainder of other Asian influences were the villains of the film. Beginning when the first cybercrime introduced to viewers consist of robots in traditional kimonos with white makeup similar to the Japanese Geishas (9:08) are the first bad guys in the film. Then the destruction the Geishas erupts can only be finished by the white intruder proves the "greater good" does not exist, but the invasion of imperial influences that will come to save the day (13:04). However, the imperial presentation of European influence creating the majority of the masses in the Tokyo, Japan is not demographically possible by showcasing the lack a Japanese in the film to take away the authenticity of the story. The yellow peril occurring in an Asian country draws the conclusion that Asian are a danger to their own people and foreigners are the saviors. Does not make too much sense? But can such actions be accepted through yellow face? This "smooth" transition into the Yellowface when a Caucasian woman with no Asian features is the daughter of Hairi (1:16:00), but it can be argued Major 's ghost was Asian and her shell was not. Does that still excuse yellow face? Does that
Open Document