Case Study: Gingrich Woodcraft Inc.

In Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau, Thoreau attempts to persuade citizens to deliberately disobey and isolate themselves from the government. Thoreau creates a metaphor where injustice impacts a government machine. First, he writes that citizens can let the government or machine try to fix itself or try to find the injustice within itself, “…but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine” (Thoreau, 1847, p. 134). Thoreau identifies that ultimately if citizens want change from injustice, citizens must disobey.

In 1690, John Locke wrote a document that supports the Consent of the Governed. It states that, “(W)hen the government is dissolved[ended], the people are at liberty to provide for themselves” (Locke 18). To simplify this, if the government fail to protect the people, they have the right to protest and protect themselves. In a protest against Donald Trump, police officers wanted to arrest protesters for unlawful acts but “The use of Kettling is unlawful if officers do not have probable use that protesters have committed unlawful acts” (Calagoal). Even though officers accused protesters for unlawful acts, they had to right to protest due to Consent of the Governed.

(AGG) What would you do if your friends and family were cold blooded killers, wouldn't you want to leave your society also? (BS-1) Jonas questions nothing about his society and does whatever someone tells him to in the beginning of the novel. (BS-2) Jonas’s change in positions allows him to start asking questions in the middle of the novel. (BS-3) Jonas rejects his society completely at the end of the novel. (TS) Jonas rejects his society because all of the relationships that he had, were broken down once he got his assignment.

While the government is more of a major ruler like earth. ‘’But they put themselves in a level with wood and earth and stones [...] than men of straw or a lump of dirt’’. Henry’s ethos shows the audience of his strategy of going against the government corruption. Henry’s speech was well-planned out to shows his audience of his experience when rebelling the government; in addition, receiving forced punishment for not paying his poll-tax. He thought out things that made himself to commit this disobedience against the government and wanted to express his experience of his ideas and strategy to disobey the government.

“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the

Totalitarianism is a strict form of government with no means of privacy. People had to be careful of what they said and did because they never knew if they were being watched. This is a huge exemplification of loss of freedoms because the people had no privacy from the government. Another freedom that Stalin removed was religion. He stated that “the party cannot be neutral towards religion, and it conducts anti-religious propaganda against all religions because it stands for science” (Document 4).

Even the firefighters were not organized or ready either! These two statements express how the owners were really at fault for this situation. The explicit meanings of Albert Marrin’s excerpt state that the lives of the factory workers did not matter and were not cared about by the owners, the fire department, and the building owner. “Holocaust” was used as the subtitle for the chapter itself. Holocaust means “...an extensive loss of life, especially through fire and also sacrifice consumed by fire,” Ana claimed from the StudySync TV video.

In this case, the ethical dilemma lies on whether the Newspaper Columnist should choose to terminate the contract and go for greener pastures against the legal law associated with contract clause. The contract is a legal entity where an agreement between two parties are met so that they can operate on specific boundaries over a certain period entail in the code of agreement. Failure of either parties in meeting the agreed terms and conditions would grant the contract null and avoid, attracting legal sanctions and ethical issues. The Columnist notified the employer about her intentions to leave the chain, breaking the contract by disregarding the existing legal terms. However, she showed partial responsibility when she notified the company about her goals.

The article contains, “They arrested my Dad the day he had his monthly pay packet in his pocket. They closed our bank account and refused my mum a working card, telling her that there was neither work nor help for vermin” said Simone (Holocaust Memorial Day Trust). Being a child and lose a father is a hard thing Also, the Nazi do not care about people or family and how they will survive. Being at

Also included in this effort was the attempt to prohibit child labor, equal pay for women, aid for retired workers, and compensation for workers who were injured (History.com Staff). Muckrakers, journalists, would publish works raising awareness of the terrible treatment of workers and the conditions, eventually leading to the passing of law that required government regulation and corporate governance (Category 4 Design, Inc). Unions were very important in the battle for reform. They pressured states into passing laws that would protect the children, allow compensation, and limit hours for women, for example, the Union Labor Party in California (Brinkley, 581). In New York, the Triangle Shirtwaist Company would lock their workers inside the building to prevent workers from leaving.