After viewing the movie Glengarry Glen Ross (1992), I thought that it was very similar to the play. I felt that the characters in the film were just like the ones in the book. Though it was the same as far as plot and characters, I felt that the movie didn’t represent postmodernism as well as the book did. Since the play was fairly short I knew that the movie would have to expand add more information in. In the first scene instead of Levene trying to convince Williams we see Levene and David Moss trying to make a sale. Though the intro differed in plot here, the characters methods on making a sale were exactly like play. Moss uses force and slight aggression while Levene is shaky and not very persuasive. We also get a glimpse on Ross using …show more content…
This is where Leveen is trying to talk Williams into giving him some better leads. However, there are some slight differences. Instead of being at the Chinese restaurant, they are both at the office. Also Leveen is sterner than the book yet he still can’t hold Williams attention. I was surprised though, because Levene tightened his belt and was much more convincing than the book portrayed him to sound. At this point in the film I made a connection, Levene reminds me of Gil from “The Simpsons”. I’m not sure if you’ve ever heard of it but he is an exact copy. With further research I actually found out believe it or not, that “Gil is based, in voice & appearance, on Jack Lemmon's portrayal of Shelley Levene in the film version of Glengarry Glen Ross: a nervous, middle-aged man with the inability to hold a steady job due to strings of misfortune that tend to hit him at the worst times” (Gil Gunderson). Here are a couple of clips to show Gil from the Simpsons. In the movie Levene believes he has just made $80k but Wilson knows the check wont cash. Similarly Gil believes he was so close to a sale when we know it was never going to happen. (Ctr ‘Click’ to view)
Chinque Thompson Professor Rai WRT 102.75 14 April 2016 The Past’s effect on the Present Lone Star directed by John Sayles is a film which follows a man’s journey trying to search for the truth in his mysterious town. Through the movie, Sayles intertwines many different backstories of various character’s lives, each of whom are dealing with their own issues of history.
On Tuesday, October 6th, “The William & Stephanie Clohesy Documentary Film Series” brought American film director, Dawn Porter, to discuss her documentary Spies of the Mississippi to UNI students. This paper not only discusses the documentary, but also goes through each step of the critical process to make an informed judgment about it. Description Spies of the Mississippi is based in the mid-1900s during the civil rights era in the southernmost state of Mississippi. It was a time when races were segregated and equality was desired by the black community. Change was not only wanted, but was fought for through various organizations, such as the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People).
Numerous screenwriters and directors have often dealt in their films with the theme of borders, whether literal and officially recognised, like military ranks or state frontiers, or abstract and metaphorical, like those of morality, justice, race, and gender, along with several others. As a consequence, as John Gibbs points out, one could assemble these movies, especially those taking place on the confines between Mexico and United States, under the label of ‘border films’ (2002: 27); thus contextualising them in a very specific tradition, which includes pictures such as Touch of Evil (Orson Welles 1958) or The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada (Tommy Lee Jones 2005). Accordingly, another notable movie belonging to the ‘border film tradition’ is Lone Star: an acclaimed 1996 hybrid of western and mystery film conventions, directed and written by independent filmmaker John Sayles. The picture recounts the story of a murder investigation, which leads the main character, Sheriff Sam
(pg55) and on (pg58) “S’pose I went in with you guys. Tha’s three hundred and fifty bucks I’d put in.” George said thoughtfully,”Look, if me an’ Lennie work a month an’ don’t spen’ nothing, we’ll have a hundred buck. That’d be four fifty, I bet we could swing her for that.”
The three movies – Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, and The Green Berets – are all movies based on the same historical event – the Vietnam war and US’s involvement in it. Yet, they all presented us with different and narrative point of view and authority figures in order to paint their individual values. The movies’ most obvious differences lie within the choice of their narrative point of view. The Green Beret, the earliest one, was directed by John Wayne and he also starred in the leading role. Wayne’s authority and influence in the 1960s was similar to the influence of Tom Hanks in the 21st Century.
The show Band of Brothers was produced by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks who, at the time, recently had success with a World War II film entitled Saving Private Ryan. Spielberg and Hanks used their expertise on war films to craft the exceptional television series Band of Brothers which originally aired on HBO in 2001. The show follows “Easy” Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, of the 101st Airborne Division, from the moment they begin their training to the moment their deployment ends. Throughout the show we see the men of “Easy” Company mature a thousand times over. The men experience love, loss, and death at rate that is inconceivable to someone that has never experienced the theatre of war.
Madison Avenue advertising executive Roger Thornhill’s (Cary Grant) life changes drastically after he is kidnapped and mistaken for a spy named George Kaplan. After a successful escape from attempted murder by Phillip Vandamm (James Mason), Roger Thornhill begins a journey to search for George Kaplan. On his itinerary, he meets the beautiful Eve Kendall (Eva Marie Saint). A romantic relationship is started between the two, leaving Thornhill to believe that Even Kendall would cooperate and help him to meet Kaplan.
Joel and Ethan Coen’s 2007 film No Country for Old Men main antagonist is Anton Chigurh, played by Javier Bardem. We see him kill several people before the scene at the gas station, where he and proprietor of the station talk. Eventually Chigurh forces him to call heads or tails. After the coin is called, Chigurh tells the man to keep it.
Bad Day at Black Rock Kathryn Abbott October 29 2015 DRAMA 3030 The unexpected arrival of a stranger to a small, Midwestern town creates a feeling of scepticism and suspicion, and through this the explicit meaning is revealed: Fear of the unknown and the moral and physical deterioration of a town left to its own devices. The film exemplifies these concepts through the use of mise-en-scène, and vivid cinematographic elements. The blood red coloured train stands out against a muted background.
When most people feel like they are close to God; they usually make good moral decisions. In Doubt by John Patrick Shanley; Sister Aloysius tells Sister James that “In the pursuit of wrongdoing, one steps away from God. Of course, there’s a price.” When stepping away from God someone is committing sins and they are doing things that are usually not accepted. As the main characters stepped away from God, they had to pay the price of making wrong choices and the price of being pressured by those choices.
The Patriot Sadness, hope, war and freedom The movie’s name is “The Patriot”. Mel Gibson plays the role of Benjamin Martin who is an American farmer in the 1800th century. Benjamin has the lead role in this movie. There are a lot of characters in the movie such as his son Gabriel (Heath Ledger) and his six other siblings.
O Brother Where Art Thou? is a film that will take you on a perilous journey with Ulysses Everett McGill and his simpleminded cohorts. This film may be set amidst the early 1930’s Great Depression era, but it still has a Homer’s Odyssey feel to it. Down in the dusty and highly racial south, Everett recruits a couple of dimwitted convicts, Pete Hogwallop and Delmar O’Donnell, to help him retrieve his lost treasure and make it back home before his wife marries another suitor.
Glory: Directed by Edward Zwick, Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group, 1989. 122 Minutes Reviewed by Mike Edward Zwick’s Glory is a movie in which the balance between entertainment and history was perfectly managed. He uses the letters sent by contemporary Col. Robert G. Shaw to his wealthy family back in Massachusetts as the historical foundation of the movie while imagining conversations between characters. Through Col. Shaw’s eye, we are able to uncover the birth, the development, and the end of the 54th Massachusetts Regiment, the first colored regiment fought in Civil War. Just like any other war movie, Glory has several battle scenes that were unpleasantly bloody, yet they managed to stay authentic.
George Aaronow and Dave Moss who are two others salesman that their sales are near the bottom and they discuss is there others ways to prevent them lose in the contest. But their discussion plan was way more illegal. During break time, In the talk, Moss has an idea to steal all the Glengarry leads and plan to sell them to another real estate agency which is Jerry Graft. In order for the plan to work, Moss tries to persuade Aaronow to break into the office and steal all the Glengarry leads but Aaronow does not want to take part in the plan. This ethical issue will cause company lost their potential customers for expensive properties which will lead the company face bankruptcy.
In the film 12 Years a Slave the editor, Joe Walker, makes use of a couple of techniques and styles that adds to the film in its own way. Long shots – Joe kept the long shots as long as he thought was necessary to add to the subject matter and the feeling he wanted to bind with the story. At the end of the film there’s this extremely long shot where Solomon is practically staring at the camera for about a minute and a half. The timing of that shot is so perfect because it’s not too short so you don’t have enough time to think about what just happened or too much time to overthink the situation. Closer to the end of the shot he lets the sound fade slowly and rapidly gives you a wakeup call when the next shot starts off where Solomon and the rest of the slaves are busy working in the field.