Nancy could based her decision that she has already have an abortion and it would be morally irresponsible for her to have another. That would allow her to think that other women can still an abortion but not her. Another way, could be that Nancy could consider her motive for an abortion to be immoral. Nancy could be aware although not perfect, her fetus has the potential to have a healthy and happy life. In that aspect, Nancy could fall in the group of moderates who believe that abortion are only allowed under certain circumstances and for Nancy a fetus with Down Syndrome could simply not fall under those circumstances.
All of the upcoming expenses begin to stress them out, and they start looking for the easiest way out. These new parents weigh the options, and they come to believe that abortion is the easiest option, but little do they know that adoption is safer, better, and cheaper than an abortion. How is an adoption safer? What if the child ends up with negligent parents? An abortion is taking away the life of an innocent, unborn child while an adoption is giving the child a better home.
1A. Ketchum feels very strongly against contracted motherhood for a number of reasons. She believes that contracted motherhood turns both women and children into property. Another complaint is that men are allowed to control the birth mother in various way. Also, women in under this contract are legally required to give up the children they bear, unlike in the case of adoption.
cons of not legalizing abortion have been debated heavily. We often tend to narrow abortion cases to unwanted pregnancy follow-on from rape, teenage love, faulty contraceptive devices, etc. in which the mother has no whim to keep the baby. However, abortion is not the sole solution to it – with increasing global infertility rate alternatives like baby adaptation can be very effective. Similarly, the mother’s right to freedom is always an important issue raised in this controversial issue, however, it is equally important to ponder whether a living being, a fetus, has access to the right to life as well or not.
For instance, let’s say the mother goes through the nine months of being pregnant with the child and has the child. Of course, if the mother does not want the child for any reasons a woman would not want a child, it is understandable that the pregnancy may not completely be enjoyable for the mother due the trials it takes on to the human body. There is still a way that more happiness can come from the mother having the child. If the mother was to give up the child for adoption after having the baby, the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number could occur, which is the entire goal of the Utilitarian thought process. So, the mother gives up the child for adoption and then a couple who possibly could not have a child could become parents.
However, in most cases it is the embryo that is aborted and not a fetus, which is the stage in which the embryo starts to develop. As such an embryo cannot be written in statistics as a life lived as it is dependent solely on the carrier, thus aborting at this stage technically should not be considered as the taking of life but as a decision on whether to facilitate this possible life. Personhood begins after a fetus is able to survive outside the womb, not at conception. Conclusion The legalization of abortion will allow a woman to fully exercise her constitutional right of freedom of choice. Benefits of abortion far exceed the disadvantages and the life to preserve and better should be that of the mother or parents and not of an unborn fetus.
Callahan would suggest that Lisa continues the pregnancy, as she does not have a right to control this other body that is dependent on her, especially since it is fully developed. The act of terminating the late pregnancy would be, according to Callahan, comparable to murdering a powerless or immature person. Lisa would need to consider herself as not just a single unit and understand that a human is developed within her care. Though it might seem like a quick and “easy” solution to terminate if the fetus was just an embryo, the fact that Lisa is carrying a six-month-old fetus makes it more morally serious and hard. Moreover, Lisa has a moral obligation to take care of this life form.
Adoption is typically an option that is thought about when the process of conceiving a biological child is out of the question. For some couples it may be infertility, potential hereditary health problems, or that carrying a child would be dangerous to the mother and unborn child. Those are just some issues that would cause a heterosexual couple to contemplate the idea of adopting a child, but what about couples of the same-sex? Same-sex couples do not have the means to reproduce together so many opt for adoption, which sounds easy, but typically is not. Adoption is a long and hard drawn out process for any couple, but for couples that are of the same-sex, they typically get the shorter end of the stick.
Some mothers also thought that having a baby will affect their lifestyle. They do not want to be a single parent at the young age. For the every reasons above, adoption is the one of the alternative resolution of unwanted pregnancy instead of the abortion. The meaning of adoption according to wikipedia is a process whereby a person assumes the parenting of another, usually a child, from that person's biological or legal parents, and in so doing, permanently transfer all rights and responsibilies, along with filiation, from the biological parent or parents. With simple words adoption is the act or process of giving official acceptance or approval something.