Globalization Cost And Benefit Analysis

894 Words4 Pages
Globalization Cost and Benefits

Globalization is about the advancement of consumerism value that promotes the acquisition of goods and purchases of goods for personal satisfaction and economic stimulation. The idea is that at the center of happiness is consumption and material possessions. With the new media and new modes of transportation they redefined what we used to consider foreign and distant. The public of the world strongly embrace tenets key of economic globalization also frightened of the disruptions and the downsides of being apart in the global economy, the rich countries as well as the poor countries. The latest Pew Global Attitudes survey of more than 45,000 people finds they are concerned about inequality, threats to their
…show more content…
Negative effects on culture:
Critics of globalization charge that exposure to foreign culture can undermine their own cultural identity. Some are concerned that the changes threaten the viability of locally made products and the people who produce them. For instant, the foreign foods in markets frequently available at cheaper prices, and this can affect local farmers that traditionally earned their living working in a small family owned shops and selling their products to their community. There is an argument about the new globalization of culture that is largely represents the “Americanization of world cultures”.
“Americanization of world cultures” vs. local culture debate is that influence of US customs and values are also consider to films and the entertainment industry in general. For instant, France governments have endeavor to protect their local cultural industries, by taking actions such as controlling the number of foreign films that can be shown.”
3. Positive effects on the
…show more content…
Negative effects on the environment:
Environmental activists often make two arguments. In one hand, they point out that the American lifestyle as environmentally “unsustainable” and believe that taken in similar values from other cultures would lead to gruesome shortages of limited natural resources. Moreover, Alan Thein Durning summarized, “If people in third world countries lived the same lifestyle as the average American, we’d need seven more earths to provide all-natural resources” Many “sustainability” supporter start from the theory that an open, effective economy is essentially unsustainable because producers and consumers are mainly concerned about their own self-interest. It is argued that, without a controlled mechanism, the economy expands unlimited while the earth’s resources and limited. Fortunately, latest experiential of the past 50-75 years suggests differently. Economic indicators state that the U.S. economy is becoming steadily more efficient and less polluting over time.
It is human nature to seek out others and exchange ideas, products and services. Attempting to limit that impulse, whether in the name of environmental sustainability, fighting communism, or some other moral crusade, is likely to be a costly and futile
Open Document