The middle class in Mumbai have always been distrustful of builders notorious for their ill-kept promises, but despite their various socio-cultural loyalties and affiliations, they all must give in to the temptations of sudden wealth while a few like the Pintos are frightened into submission and the Masterji gets eliminated. Thomas Friedman, the well-known chronicler of globalisation, argues that the destruction in the wake of globalisation is inherently creative in that it destroys the old to make way for the new. Whatever has become redundant must perish and manure the new. In The World is Flat, he avers that it gives the opportunity for every individual and society to make independent choices about what to discard, adapt and adopt. Otherwise: …show more content…
Balram and Shah, being quick learners, are the epitomes of adaptability and, therefore, destined for scaling up the higher echelons of the social pyramid. When Balram realises that if he needs to liberate himself, he must break out and escape from the fear of the Rooster Coop, he orchestrates a murder without any qualms of conscience, steals money, leaves his comfort zone and transplants himself to a new city in the South. Shah, who comes to Mumbai as a penniless drifter, becomes a smuggler first, then a slum re-developer and finally a big time builder by seizing one opportunity after another as they unfold before …show more content…
Shah, the powerful builder in Last Man in Tower, the ultimate beneficiary of the rising per capita income and soaring middle-class aspirations ever since the advent of globalisation, is also represented as one among its many unhappy victims. He is constantly aware that the pollution of the big city and the dirt and grime from his construction site are slowly killing him. The pressures he inflicts upon his victims through various means also take a heavy toll on him by making him all the more inhuman. His deceased wife had commented on his work only once: that if he kept on “threatening other people and their children, one day something might happen” to his own child (Last Man in Tower 162). The fact that his own son is a good for nothing drug addict and a member of a lawless gang of hooligans vexes him sorely. His trusted left-hand man Shanmugham, whom he holds close to his heart like his own son, runs out of patience and blackmails him for a sweetener after the Vishram deal. Though he has a mistress kept in a gilded cage in Versova, he is deprived of true love. His personal life is in shambles despite all his material well-being and the limitless power he wields. Balram’s case is even worse. Without a friend or anyone to love, except a nephew to take care of and whose loyalty can only be counted on pecuniary terms and little else, Balram is a loner. The only consolation for Balram is
(200). The utter lack of empathy, or simply the lack of humanity, this supposed head of the household displays towards his wife and his children are completely unbelievable; it beckons the question of how can one be so self-absorbed in order to abandon the health, let alone happiness, of
Shahana lives in a region that is currently in the midst of a war between India and Pakistan. Despite the constant violence that she faces, Shahana is a courageous and compassionate person who is always willing to help others. One example of Shahana's courage is her willingness to sacrifice her own happiness for the sake of her brother. When Tanveer, her younger brother, is arrested by the Indian authorities, Shahana agrees to marry Mr. Nadir, a wealthy and powerful man, in exchange for Tanveer's release. This is a difficult decision for Shahana, as she does not love Mr. Nadir and knows that she will be giving up her freedom and independence.
Do you ever wonder find yourself wondering how we lived in a world without the internet, smartphones, and televisions? This new world of technology that we live in today is do to the globalization “super story”, which enables us to put things in ways we, individually, can comprehend. Thomas Friedman, an American journalist and three time Pulitzer Prize winner, suggest in his article “Globalization: The Super Story”, that the world has shifted from the international Cold War system to the new international system of Globalization. In other words, the world has adapted to a system of integration rather than divide. Overall, I perceived the article to be terrifying convincing, yet, upon further review I discovered to issues and lack of empathy from Friedman 's point of view.
By the story’s end, Amir and Baba become closer. They are in America and times have been difficult. “‘I am moftakhir, Amir,’ he said. Proud” (Hosseini 139). Baba kept pushing Amir to graduate high school and when he did, Baba was very proud.
Therefore considering Beck’s thesis, it is still applicable or relevant to the third world and not just only limited to the so called industrialized (first world) countries or a particular social class since globalization has no boundaries. A good understanding of Beck’s thesis commences with an understanding of the explosion of industrial modernity and the manner it is overshadowing nature. Structure:
This act brings Amir to new lows. It reveals his true immoral character by showing his pitiful treatment of even those who are lose to him. Lastly, Amir does have a building moment when he wins the kite tournament and celebrates with Baba. This is because since Amir 's mother died giving birth to him Amir and his father have been distant.
In the article, “A Million Dollar Exit From the Anarchic Slum-World: Slumdog Millionaire’s Hollow Idioms of Social Justice”, Mitu Sengupta responds to how the slums and its citizens are presented in the film Slumdog Millionaire by Danny Boyle. Sengupta describes the slums as run-down and then goes on to specifically address the poverty that exists in India. When writing about the portrayal of the slums, Sengupta states, “Slumdog depicts the ‘slum’ as a feral wasteland, a place of evil and decay that is devoid of order, productivity and compassion”(599). Sengupta uses imagery to illustrate to viewers the unsanitary conditions that the people of Mumbai experience on a daily basis.
In Hosseini’s A Thousand Splendid Suns , Nana tells Mariam that a man always finds a way to blame a woman. This mistreatment of women is depicted in the novel by utilizing multiple examples. Throughout the novel, men were able to use women as scapegoats in the Afghani society that deemed women as unequal to men.
Afghanistan is a country full of social expectations and boundaries influenced by both class and ethnicity. Amir and Hassan come from polar opposite social backgrounds: Amir, a wealthy member of the dominant Pashtuns, and Hassan, a child servant to Amir and member of the minority Hazaras. Yet, as young children, it seems as though this difference is a mere annoyance rather than a serious blockade to their friendship. This all changes, though, when Amir makes a split second decision, a decision shaped by his unconscious desire to uphold their class difference. Hassan does everything for Amir, most specifically, he runs his kites, and when the town bully wants to steal that kite, Hassan resists even in the face of unspeakable violence.
The kite runner explores the idea of social hierarchy and how is causes discrimination to those surrounded by it. Social hierarchy is organized through a social structure called the caste system that separates the different social classes. The caste system plays a very important role in the kite runner. The book illustrates how the discrimination of the Hazaras is accepted and practiced by the Pashtuns. Their differences have led to the Pashtuns being the majority group and the Hazaras as the minority group.
Baba neglected Amir, which caused him to make poor decisions, while vying for his father’s love. Amir finds his true self and in the end his relationship with Baba helped to form him into the man he was at the end of the novel, one Baba is proud of. A loving and empathetic fatherly figure is necessary in a son’s
They called him the man without name. They called him Unlucky. And now his troubles have followed her. Even her childhood best friend, Ohene Nyarko, would not take her as his second wife. Though he would never say it, she knew what he was thinking: that she was not worth the loss of yams and wine a bride price would cost him” (Gyasi 133).
In order to raise awareness of the staggering injustices, oppression and mass poverty that plague many Indian informal settlements (referred to as slum), Katherine Boo’s novel, Behind the Beautiful Forevers, unveils stories of typical life in a Mumbai slum. There are discussions on topics surrounding gender relations, environmental issues, corruption, religion, and class hierarchies, as well as demonstrating India’s level of socioeconomic development. Encompassing this, the following paper will argue that Boo’s novel successfully depicts the mass social inequality within India. With Indian cities amongst the fastest growing economies in South East Asia, it is difficult to see evidence of this in the individual well-being of the vast majority of the nation. With high unemployment rates, the expansion of informal settlements and the neglect of basic human rights, one of India’s megacities, Mumbai, is a good representation of these social divisions.
The movie “Lion” follows the story of a A five-year-old Indian boy who gets lost on a train, taking him thousands of kilometers away from home. After trying to survive alone for a while he gets sent to an orphanage and subsequently gets adopted by a couple in Australia. After twenty five years of getting overwhelming flashbacks of his past, he sets out to find his lost family. Globalization contributes to many of the outcomes in his life. The forces of globalization are also present in many aspects of the film.
His idiosyncrasy remains loving and understanding, even when his younger son returned home after many of been away with not a penny to his name. The young son showed disobedience to all the goodness his father had offered to him. The young son showed traits such as selfishness as well as being ungrateful. He had no worth for his father’s property nor did he want to work alongside his father on the family farm.