Overall, I would say that Pollan’s solution to the western diet would be much more effective than Balko’s. Pollan takes much more realistic approach whereas Balko’s ideas seem to be ineffective and hard to accomplish. Pollan suggests we eat more plants and whole foods which we can do if we grow our own garden or travel to all natural farms to get our fruits and vegetables. He also suggests we cook instead of getting fast food which I agree with. The quality would be much better if we made it ourselves instead of taking shortcuts.
GMOs are used to help crops thrive in harsh conditions so that people in poorer areas have more sustainable food supply. The thought of GMOs is a bit unsettling when learning how far science has altered food, particularly meats and seafood. However, if there is no evidence that GMOs are harming us nor have they discovered any damage done to the environment related to GMOs. I prefer to have something that I believe has not been tampered with but overall will not change my buying habits at this time. I feel until science proves otherwise the benefits of GMOs deem it a necessary
As there is more than 600 studies form many renowned research institutions, which prove the extensive safety of GM food. Furthermore, many scientists have pointed out that those scientific research that proves GM food is harmful has great flaws in the design of the experiment and the result is not accurate and fair to reflect the actual situation of GM food. Despite the fact that scientific evidence has once again proved GM food does benefit our world, the bulk of the wild debate is still centered around the fear and the lack of knowledge about GM technology, in which the concerns of GM food causing human health problems are usually baseless. It shows that science no later matters in this case: people’s fear and illiteracy have masked their objectivity towards GM food. The fear of genetic modification is rooted in the fact that the technology is complicated and hard to understand.
In general, you should avoid refined sugar and flour, opting for whole grains instead. Other foods to add include fresh fruits and vegetables, lean protein and healthy fats (in moderation). The closer foods are to their natural state, the better. For example, a bowl of regular oatmeal is healthier than an oatmeal cookie. Weight loss doesn’t have to be hard, though those who sell fad diets would like you to think differently.
The Locavore Movement Increasing levels of greenhouse gases produced by fuel of trucks and animal production has caused a major impact in pollution and climate change. Also, in the U.S. there is a bad nutrition outbreak due to not eating enough fresh foods with the right nutrients. There is a movement taking place is aimed to solve this problem but will it actually work? The Locavore Movement is aimed to increase the nutrition in foods and reduce pollution. The Locavores, which are people of this movement, have decided to eat locally grown or produce products as much as possible.
I think the government should help with our diets because it doesn’t seem like we are able to control ourselves and we continuously are putting our health at risk by not eating right. We’re being plagued with diseases because of our obesity. We are losing money and our youth is steadily becoming more obese and more overweight. The government should put restrictions on the things we eat so we can become a much better society as a whole. Curbing obesity isn’t taking away freedom, in a way, it would make us freer.
All we’ve heard about GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) is that they will poison our children, make all of us sick, and make Big Agriculture even more money while screwing over the little family owned farms. None of those claims are true, in fact GMOs can actually make people healthier and with the development of disease, pesticide, and herbicide resistant grains, fruits, and vegetables the small farmers will profit from growing these new super foods. People should not be opposed to GMOs, especially because Genetically Modified Foods can help make food cheaper and more widely available. In the year 2000 Ingo Potrykus and Peter Beyer began development on a strain of rice that would give people in the third world a sustainable source of food that would provide the micronutrients they so desperately need. This project was named ‘Golden
Magazines and websites everywhere now have celebrities advertising their latest switch to the gluten-free diet. This forced way of life for those with Celiac disease has now become trendy amongst those who can tolerate gluten. Non-celiacs across the world are now taking this protein out of their diet in hopes to lose weight, become healthier, and gain energy; however the opposite effect is taking place in many cases. Removing gluten from one’s diet when they do not have celiac disease or any other gluten allergy is not beneficial and in a handful of cases is harmful. The majority of people removing gluten from their diet are not educated on what makes up gluten.
Each time we choose red meat over another meat alternative, we are shortening our lives. Although there is more research to be done, the risks of eating red meat do not outweigh the benefits. If anyone chooses to reduce or omit red-meat from their diet, they must be prepared to hear many arguments against this choice. The following arguments are often presented:
To improve the overall health of our society, should Americans embrace the whole food movement, the potential benefits of processed foods or some other solution altogether? In our society most people choose to eat processed food instead of whole food. They prefer to eat processed food because it is much more cheaper than whole food. Whole foods are not cheap because the farmers don’t use chemicals when they are raising the plants. I think processed foods are unhealthy because people around the world getting extra fat and some kind of illnesses.