Go Back to History Class
In Ian Tuttle’s article, he is arguing that the students need to go back to class, regardless on how they feel about the changes to the curriculum. Although this was written in current times, it still lends itself to be read interpretively. The reader has to look at the social and political context of the time the article was written to fully understand the impact of it and the feelings surrounding the people involved.
America has always been a country based on the values of freedom of speech and not having censorship. In 1791 the founders of the United States ratified the Bill of Rights, which contained the freedom of speech and peaceful protest. American history is full of people taking full advantage of this
…show more content…
Many school districts and teachers have openly stated they do not agree with the Common Core standards and wish they did not have to implement them, but to get the funding the school needs they do. With curriculum changes currently happening all around the country, wherever the reader is have heard about the upcoming changes and have formed their own opinion on it. This is the closest anyone could get to the Colorado situation without actually being there. Common Core is such a controversial topic that many people think over reaches the federal governments grasp on education (CBS, 2014, para. 22). The states hold the power of education, which is why, up until now in history, there have been no national standards. Many people think that the federal government is taking over more than they are allowed and want to fight against the Common Core. Tuttle believes the government should be hands off in all aspects other that national defense and nationalism in his neoconservative ways. Common Core does not fall under either of those categories, but the changes in the AP curriculum
In the article, “Quarrel over Common Core: A Pennsylvania Primer” by Randy Kraft (2014), Common Core and the controversy surrounding it are discussed heavily. Kraft’s thesis is to inform the audience about Common Core and explain, impartially, the arguments for and against it. In 2010, Pennsylvania took on the Common Core Standards. These standards were put in place to ensure that students of Pennsylvania were on the same academic level by graduation, and enable them to be better equipped to compete in a global marketplace (p. 1).
This statement displays the regressive nature of censoring history in classrooms, and elicits similar feelings of anger and disgust from the audience. This phrase also serves as a call to action for the audience by using their newfound disdain to affect change and assist progress in this case. Furthermore, the sentiment that “censoring history is an act of cowardice” is bluntly reflected throughout the article (Pitts). The author’s outright declaration of such an attitude implies that the school board officials who approved such a measure are cowardly and unwilling to accept the elaborate yet flawed history of the United States. The fact that these officials would let their own denial interfere with students’ right to learn the complete American history is outrageous, and Leonard Pitts emphasizes this belief constantly in order to rouse the audience’s emotions.
What was revealed by analysis showing a progression through time with CCSS? Both America’s political left and right vigorously tout their solution is the only one and education is a hotbed because it is an easy target. Evidence: Activists and politicos try and harness the debate from any angle that would put their point of view ahead of their rival. Common Core in the mainstream right media is portrayed as an evil creation by the left. Generally it has nothing to do with the standards themselves, but is likely to be any additional hot point that can be born under the name Common Core (Simon).
Sawchuk, S. (2012). Many Teachers Not Ready for the Common Core. Education Digest, 16-22. http://proxy.ashland.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=82981829&site=ehost-live Beginning this research I stumbled on this article which discusses the successful implementation of the Common Core Standards.
With over one million signatures and comments from parents against the program, there has been little progress with the disputes they have made. Some claim that education should be left entirely out of the hands of the government, with little to no interference in how classrooms are run or taught. The belief that the education of a child is best left in the hands of those closest are the best to make the decisions, rather than federal acts. The Common Core is a substandard arrangement of benchmarks which negatively affect instructor assessments, school responsibility measures, instructional procedures, educational modules, subsidizing, intercessions for low-performing schools, and school tests
From No Child Left Behind to Common Core education has taken a complete turn. It is no longer controlled by people that actually take part in the routine day to day, yet maybe it never has been. New people come into the office for the board of education and change education to what they think is best, even though they have never been in the classroom themselves. When it comes time to change the standards once again because the current standards are no longer working, a real teacher needs to be placed in the situation to decide how and what students learn. It is time to take the democracy out of teaching.
Common Core Mathematic Standards have been under evaluation because of a debate between college professors, some who feel the standards are not substantial enough to prepare students for the college degree. It is a teacher’s responsibility to prepare their students for the next level. Even many supporters believe that the Common Core State Standards have many flaws and should be evaluated. With that being stated, the board that constructed the standards made mention that the cause for these flaws is because they focused so much on the K-8 standards that they ran out of time. Because of this short time, they ended up having to rush to work sure the K-8 plus or High School Standards were completed, meaning they had less time to truly think them through.
It was discovered that in education there were certain areas that were universal and common among learning. The two main subjects of concern were English language arts and mathematics. Common core is the new curriculum implemented now in school systems to develop learning. Common Core Standards are a clear set of shared goals and expectations for the knowledge and skills students need in English language arts and mathematics at each grade level so they can be prepared to succeed in college, career, and life. Although, Common Core seems to be here to stay this article addresses concerns in reference to content, instruction, and assessment.
Nevertheless, schools are facing hard times and taking the loss right where it hurts, the pocketbook. Many states signed up for the new curriculum within only two months, which was not nearly long enough to make sure that the new learning standard was fit for them. By signing up, these states agreed to buy tests and upgrade their technology to administer the tests. All of this added up to thirty dollars per student, more than what half the states can afford. “Common Core Causes Collateral Damage” reveals, “Just last month, Maryland announced it would need $100 million to get schools up to speed to administer the tests”(McShane, 2).
Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards that effects students and teachers involved in grades kindergarten through twelfth grade. It states in detail what every student should know in the subjects of Math and English at the end of each grade. These academic standards were created for many reasons, mainly to ensure that all students are well prepared with the correct skills and knowledge after high school that are necessary to succeed in college, their career, and life regardless of where they live. These standards were created in hopes of decreasing the academic gap between America’s students and their international peers.
The citizens of the US have expressed their thoughts and concerns through free speech. This has allowed much-needed change to happen because people were able to express and defend the changes that needed to be made through the freedoms in the first amendment such as the freedoms of speech, assembly and petition. One instance of free speech being used to make changes in society was when women were finally granted the right to vote after many protests and petitions and gatherings related to passing the 19th amendment. The 19th amendment would likely have been passed much later or not at all if there hadn’t been so many people protesting and petitioning the government to pass it. “Signed into law on August 26, 1920, the passage of the 19th Amendment was the result of decades of work by tens of thousands across the country who worked for change.
The American government was originally built on the idea of England's parliamentary system. After America had an outline of a well-rounded political system, they established the Constitution. In the Bill of Rights, the very first amendment listed is the freedom of speech. The right to state your opinion is the critical base of the first amendment. I believe peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society.
In 1783 he said, “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be lead, like sheep to the slaughter.” This reveals that freedom of speech is vital to the citizen’s rights. In 1534, the monarchs in England restricted what could be printed. Although we still have some restrictions of what content is allowed on the media, opinions, thoughts, and ideas can all be presented clearly through press. Lastly, freedom to assemble and to petition the government was added so that the government could not take away the citizen’s rights to assemble and petition, which was done in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party.
Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter” (Bailey). The US Constitution provides all Americans with the right to peacefully petition the laws made by the government in the First Amendment. Without the right to petition, American schools would still be segregated between African Americans and whites and most women would still mainly be housewives. Some of the everyday things experienced in America were once fought for tirelessly by protesters. Protests have changed the country and often have a ripple effect in society and in government.
Constitution of 1791,” could give an examples of as to why certain people think that this is a federal interference. First, the “Common Core Octopus” shows the life being suck out of the people who are running the different sections in the U.S. Department of Education, and this is happening because the U.S. Department of Education is allowing the state and local communities to have all the power, to control the testing, data, etc. In Senator Lamar Alexander’s excerpts “Remarks before the National Education Association upon Receiving the National Association Friend of Education Award,” he says, “...the classroom teachers of America, who helped pass the law to fix No Child Left Behind, who helped reverse the trend toward a national school board, and who helped restore responsibility for children in 100,000 public schools to the states, to the communities, and to the classroom teacher where it belongs... For 15 years, your classrooms have been ruled from Washington, D.C…”.