Role of leader in shaping the organisational culture
From the above example of Google Inc., it can be seen that leaders in Google are consistent and fair in their leadership giving guidance for others to follow. Formal education on employees and leaders do not even matter as long as said employees are innovative, skilful and excited enough to work in the company. There are even teams in the company that have 14% member who are not college graduates (Whiteside, 2015).
Eric Schmidt was an example of a great leader who was the CEO of the Google Inc. until 2011. He was replaced by Larry Page, the founder of Google and given some legal position in the company. He was accountable for the success of Google from the past 10 years. His leadership
…show more content…
Google Inc. has a unique organisational culture giving more freedom for employees unlike the traditional hierarchy organisations that have wider range of bureaucracy. The freedom given to employees is to encourage innovation and to apply analytical thinking. An older tradition of Power Culture as mentioned above in Aetna’s case is a depiction of how culture can affect the financial standing of the company. If the organisational culture is defective, the company will suffer even if it existed for over one hundred long years. Nevertheless, as related in Aetna’s case, the old culture can be shifted to a new one which is more favourable to both the company and the employees. Moreover, in terms of leadership, Google Inc. accepts undergraduates that are competent to do the tasks given to them. These employees can even become leaders as long as they are effective and innovative enough to manage their own teams. This is why the company formulated eight important traits as a guide for young leaders who have lesser experiences in managing. The eight character traits that a manager should have like being an effective coach, empowering employees, getting to know employees, being a good communicator, being productive, helping employees with career development, being goal-oriented and mastering technical skills are important factors for Google’s success. The success also comes from constant motivation and innovation by leaders especially by the former CEO for 10 years Eric Schmidt. The organisational culture of giving more freedom to employees also increased employees’ performance and standards. Therefore, embracing a culture that involves employees and managers from planning to execution just like the case of Aetna and Google Inc. is an effective organisational culture that can benefit both the company and the
(Kerfoot 1998) (Evans, 2003). The Personality traits for good leader are activity level or energy, adjustment, dominance, assertiveness, emotional balance and emotional control, self- confidence, originality, intelligence, tolerance of stress, personal integrity, independence, achievement motivation, sociability, responsibility, initiative, and diplomacy (NYSTEDT 1997). Furthermore, Agreeableness and conscientiousness is perceived as a trait for transformational leaders (ARTOG2 et al 2005).
ood to Great Summary In the modern classic management theory, Jim Collins establishes management concepts in his book Good to Great. Jim Collins recognizes and assesses variables and factors that enable a small fraction of a business to transit from good to great. In the nine chapters of the book, the author discourses some of personnel, management, and operational practices that offer a possible environment for an organization to leapfrog from good to its greatest achievements. At the beginning of the book, the writer, and his research team talks about the criteria used to select the companies that used as the basis of meta-analysis.
Leadership Pikes Peak is planning a scavenger hunt on Oct 29. PPLD will be one of the stops on the hunt. The participants will need to find a book on the hold shelf that has been placed on one of the LPP staff’s library cards. Alan ok’d for LPP to put a 8.5X11 sign on the front door that tells the participants to come inside the library. LPP will remove the sign at the end of the hunt.
1. Introduction to Organisational Structures The Organizational Structure within a company determines the way in which an organization’s operational activities are performed. Some of the main operations defined within an organizational structure include the allocation, supervision, and coordination of how a project is to be completed. The organizational structure will determine how tasks are performed during a project and who the tasks are to be performed by. The organizational structure also states who will manage or oversee the project and the processes or protocols that will be implemented during the time frame of that particular project.
The Importance of a Company’s Culture The culture of a company is one of the most important and sometimes overlooked factors in an organization. The culture can increase employee engagement and increase productivity which will allow a company to reach its goals, “From productivity and engagement in the organization’s day-to-day, to an employer brand that naturally fuels recruiting efforts, to creating a lasting brand that customers immediately recognize, there’s no escaping it – culture radiates outward into the marketplace” (Straz 2015). The culture can have a great impact on the employees. Employees thrive in a positive working environment and the ability to engage with their managers without fear of retaliation.
While other companies were focused on marketing their sites and increasing advertising revenues, Google stripped the search page of all distractions and presented a blank page with a search box. Larry Page knew that ads and advertisements simply annoyed their customer. This devotion to its customer gave it a market advantage compared to other sites since people will now trust google more and use it more often. This mindset and vision set by Larry page is also reflected in the mindset of all Google workers. Aside from this, Google is also dedicated to keeping their employees happy.
The effect of power on culture and leadership is real and this effect can be long lasting. The term power conjures up images of both evil and good and is a subject that is rarely discussed in management planning sessions or leadership training. But, because strength is the basis for influence attempts understanding its uses and limitations help a leader to learn to use it effectively. Becoming a efficacious leader is critical because companies do not form accidentally. Leaders help companies for culture by being goal oriented, having a specific purpose, and are created because one or more individuals perceive that the concerted and coordinated action of a number of people can accomplish something that individual action cannot.
Focusing on the leadership of Epaphras and his spiritual authority to lead them, we witness Paul utilize “the same ministry terminology he uses for himself.” A handful of peculiarities manifests as a result on a ministerial leader. Firstly, the action of Epaphras himself, as Hiebert states, “Epaphras knew the result he expected from his prayers. He had grasped the reality of ministering to his people through his prayers for them“ Epaphras exhibits the duty of the spiritual leader to pry. Hiebert further discusses Epaphras’s desire for and manifestation of stability.
Leadership has been defined in a variety of ways, there are multiple authors and theorists who have tried to define and understand leadership, all leading to varying theories and conclusions, but one thing that is universally understood is the importance of effective leadership and how someone with good leadership skills can impact so many people around them. (Kakabadse and Kakabadse, 1999; Yukl, 2002; Northouse,2013) The main components that have been identified to play a role in leadership are relations between leader and subordinates, interaction form between leader and followers, the influence that the leader has, the way in which the leader behaves and finally a leader’s traits. (Yukl, 2002) These elements that make up a leader, are then used as building blocks to identify the way in which each specific leader deals with its followers.
Organizational Culture Assessment Executive Summary Organizational culture denotes a set of values, artifacts, beliefs, assumptions, and norms that emerges from the interactions of members of an organization. It is a generic term used to signify a host of behaviors that connote general operating norms of conduct for a corporation and the framework against which organizational effectiveness is evaluated. The aim of this paper was to examine the cultural values of Baxter Healthcare Corporation and report on how the company’s organizational culture affects the way it operates and perform its objectives. Moreover, by using information regarding Baxter’s corporate culture obtained through a face-to-face interview with Baris U. Agar, Ph.D. – a senior
According to our group discussion in term of “leadership” in business world, leadership is not just the person who have the job title or higher range position in an organization but leader is the person who knows the way and ability to demonstrate the possible way to
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
Leadership: Definition Leadership is the process of influencing the motive of the employees and so directing, guiding them to the proper completion of the short-term goals and the mission, vision of the firm. Leadership referring to achieve a specific set of goals of the business enterprise by minimizing risk and more advantage of opportunities is also called Entrepreneurial Leadership (Rao, 2015). Today leadership is such an iterative process when the leaders should have a variety of qualities and expertise in different area of management. Here, different theories will be explained which can clearly identify the scope, the responsibilities and the area of expertise required to be successful leader.
‘Organizations provide its managers with legitimate authority to lead, but there is no assurance that they will be able to lead effectively’ (Lunenburg, 2011). Organizational success usually requires a combination of both management and leadership. In today’s dynamic work environment, leaders are expected to challenge the present state of affairs, and to motivate and convince organization members. Managers are needed to assist in creating and maintaining a positive and well-functioning workplace. ‘Leadership and management are often considered practically overlapping concepts’ (Bohoris and Vorria, 2007, p. 1).
A few societies support development and threats, while others admonish the individuals who challenge set up standards and practices. The report showed how Etihad Airways culture effect on the employees and their performance. Each company must consider and apply the best way to create the greatest culture to their