Government Ignorance In 12 Angry Men And Beasts Of The Southern Wild
In these two critically-acclaimed movies, government ignorance is explored in distinct ways. In 12 Angry Men, a jury of 12 men is sent to determine the fate of an 18-year-old slum-raised Latino boy accused of stabbing his father to death. A guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. In Beasts of the Southern Wild we are taken on an adventure alongside Hushpuppy, an African-American six-year old, who lives on a poverty-stricken island called the Bathtub and whose father’s tough love prepares her for a harsh world. As completely opposite as these two perspectives seem, each represents opposing sides of social injustice and ultimately deliver similar messages. In 12 Angry Men, the movie begins in a courtroom where the case is being discussed by the judge, who seems fairly uninterested. The jurors …show more content…
Another interesting aspect of this 1957 film is the “reverse prejudice” portrayed by juror 8, who is initially sympathetic to the accused, not because of the evidence, but because he pitied his poor and troubled upbringing. This “reverse prejudice” is tested when Juror 6 says, “Suppose you talk us outta this and the kid really did knife his father?” This is something that would create an outcome that is short of justice. This perspective also becomes a reoccurring factor in both movies. In Beasts of the Southern Wild, Hushpuppy lives on a poverty-stricken island called the Bathtub that is located just outside the city of New Orleans on the other side of a levee that separates the city’s utopia from what is seen as a dystopia (the Bathtub). The Bathtub is off the grid, a place where state or federal government is remote. This movie is said to represent the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina by many movie critics, when both the government and FEMA shut their eyes to the devastating situation and left the survivors (most of them being African-Americans) to fend for themselves. This was a product of both the government’s ignorance and the incompetence of FEMA’s
Subsidiarity In Beasts Of The Southern Wild
889 Words | 4 PagesIn Beasts of the Southern Wild, the city of Bathtub undergoes extreme climate conditions and flooding disasters. The flooding effects Hushpuppy, the main character, and her father Wink by means of their relationship and living conditions. Bathtub is a small community, inhabited by rural louisiana citizens who value togetherness and are close knit as a group. They come together to survive the flooding in their community and by doing so, they represent several Catholic Social Teaching themes such as solidarity and life and dignity of a human person. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops defines solidarity as unity within a community, no matter the racial, national, ethnic, economic, or ideological differences (Usccb 1).
Self Interest In On The Waterfront And Twelve Angry Men
1225 Words | 5 PagesIn Twelve Angry Men the direction of the jury room was pushed by self interest to leave. ‘7th Juror: goddamn waste of time. 10th Juror: yeah, can you imagine, sitting there for three days just for this.’
12 Angry Men Assessment: 12 Angry Men
755 Words | 4 PagesDaja McLaurin Benton TA: Yiwen Dai Communications: 250 1 April, 2016 12 Angry Men Assessment After viewing the movie 12 Angry Men the group was able to implement the ideas of group think immediately during the start of the movie. Since the men briefly established a relationship from the time of witnessing the trial to start of deliberation n the empty room and reaching a unanimous decision, they found that all of the men initially achieved a verdict of guilty accept for juror 8. After this surprising decision the men began to show their true colors and distinguish how one may believe something and another juror may believe another. The group takes time in pleading individual opinions while deciding on the guilt or innocence of a young boy
Fallacies In Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men
980 Words | 4 PagesFallacies in 12 Angry Men 12 Angry Men- a 1957 film, rather a courtroom drama, is full of emotions represented in arguments and intellectual brainstorming. Directed by Sidney Lumet, the film is an example of intellectual art. The film is based the story of a 18-year old slum boy who was on trial for killing his father by stabbing him. The judges, after seeing all the evidences and witnesses, actually leave the decision to the jury, to decide whether the boy was guilty or not. Also, if the jury decides that the boy is guilty, he would have to face the electric chair.
Beasts Of The Southern Wild Analysis
1849 Words | 8 Pages“Beasts of the Southern Wild” is a film that the focuses on the Louisiana levee as a barrier between two completely different ways of living. Benh Zeitlin uses the community of The Bathtub to shine a different light on poverty. He discusses the idea that not all people share the belief that the higher your quality of life is, the happier you are. In fact, the people of The Bathtub do not have a linear view of socioeconomic circumstance at all.
Marxism In 12 Angry Men
412 Words | 2 Pages12 Angry Men Henry Fonda the eighth juror paradigm is the belief that the 18-year-old is innocent because how the evidence doesn’t seem clear to him. At the start of the trial all of the jurors, but him believes the boy killed his father. His paradigm is positive because he believes the boy has done nothing wrong and he pulls theories on why the boy could be innocent. What Henry paradigm creates is how the old man and woman are witnesses that made false accusations. What he gets from this is convincing the other jurors why he could be right.
Ethos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men
1964 Words | 8 Pages"Don 't judge a book by its cover" is a famous saying that some of us heard it before and some of us experienced it. 12 jurors were experiencing this quote when they gathered to decide whether a young boy is guilty by killing his father or not. Juror 2 stated, "Well, anyway, I think he was guilty" (6). Juror 2 represent most of us, as sometimes we judge from what we hear and not from what we see. The 12 jurors are from various backgrounds and each one has a distinctive personality.
Examples Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men
915 Words | 4 PagesPeople act upon what they think. Within “12 Angry Men”, all of the jurors have an opinion but some voice their more than others. One juror in particular, Juror Ten, voices his opinion about the boy in question. Repeatedly throughout the play, Juror Ten makes many thoughtless and hurtful comments about a certain kind of people. It is clear that Juror Ten’s uncompromising belief that the accused is guilty is because of his dislike for the boy’s race.
Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men
1458 Words | 6 PagesMobashshir Arshad Ansari DM 16230 The movie “12 Angry Men” is a court drama based movie. The entire film takes place within a small New York City jury room, on "the hottest day of the year," as 12 men debate the fate of a young defendant charged with murdering his father. Most courtroom movies feel it necessary to end with a clear-cut verdict. But "12 Angry Men" never states whether the defendant is innocent or guilty if innocent then who is guilty.
Juror Eight And Juror Three In John Steinbeck's 12 Angry Men
502 Words | 3 PagesIn the play 12 Angry Men, a murder case is being reviewed by a jury. This jury must decide if a kid who killed his father is guilty or not. Two jurors that were on opposing sides for most of the play was Juror Eight and Juror Three. The reason they were on opposing sides was because Juror Three believed the kid was guilty, while Juror Eight believed there was not enough evidence to convict him. Most of the jurors wanted to settle on having reasonable doubt, so another jury could be called in.
12 Angry Men Analysis
814 Words | 4 Pages‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.
House Symbolism In The Destructors
718 Words | 3 PagesFirst of all, the structure of the house, known as the “Old Misery’s,” represents the past glory of England. The elaborateness of the house is symbolic of the old class structure. Trevor, or T., describes the house to be “beautiful,” and this word worries Blackie, the initial leader of the gang, because it “[belongs] to a class world” (90). To the new generation, the class structure is an unpleasant remnant of the past.
Examples Of Social Injustice In 12 Angry Men
803 Words | 4 PagesIn these two critically-acclaimed movies, government ignorance is explored in distinct ways. In 12 Angry Men, a jury of 12 men is sent to determine the fate of an 18-year-old slum-raised Latino boy accused of stabbing his father to death. A guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. In Beasts of the Southern Wild we are taken on an adventure alongside Hushpuppy, an African-American six-year old, who lives on a poverty-stricken island called the Bathtub and whose father’s tough love prepares her for a harsh world. As completely opposite as these two perspectives seem, each represents opposing sides of social injustice and ultimately deliver similar messages.
Racism In Mississippi Burning
806 Words | 4 PagesSupported from how brutal humans can truly be. The town, located in Philadelphia, Mississippi was utterly corrupt I cannot begin to imagine why fellow humans would harm one another in such acts of violence. For such an idiotic reason of an individual 's skin color. For instance, one particular scene in the film is nothing else but graphic.
Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men
721 Words | 3 PagesThe movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.
More about Government Ignorance In 12 Angry Men And Beasts Of The Southern Wild
Subsidiarity In Beasts Of The Southern Wild
889 Words | 4 PagesSelf Interest In On The Waterfront And Twelve Angry Men
1225 Words | 5 Pages12 Angry Men Assessment: 12 Angry Men
755 Words | 4 PagesFallacies In Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men
980 Words | 4 PagesBeasts Of The Southern Wild Analysis
1849 Words | 8 PagesMarxism In 12 Angry Men
412 Words | 2 PagesEthos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men
1964 Words | 8 PagesExamples Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men
915 Words | 4 PagesMinority Influence In 12 Angry Men
1458 Words | 6 PagesJuror Eight And Juror Three In John Steinbeck's 12 Angry Men
502 Words | 3 Pages12 Angry Men Analysis
814 Words | 4 PagesHouse Symbolism In The Destructors
718 Words | 3 PagesExamples Of Social Injustice In 12 Angry Men
803 Words | 4 PagesRacism In Mississippi Burning
806 Words | 4 PagesSocial Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men
721 Words | 3 Pages