ipl-logo

Government In Iraq

1116 Words5 Pages

Essay #1 The United States worked together to establish a strong government in Iraq along with its leaders. The issue that was being debated was, which type of government would work best for Iraq? Here in the United States, our government is based off of a federal system. A federal system is “a system government in which the national government and state government share power and derive authority from its people” (O’Connor, Sabato, and Yanus, 41). America was not always based off of the federal system. Our first form of government after declaring ourselves independent from Britain was a confederate system named The Articles of Confederation. A confederation is “a type of government in which the national government derives its powers from …show more content…

Dawisha and K. Dawisha, paragraph 16). Not all provinces are guaranteed to work together and if a nation-wide issue were to arise, handling it would be difficult because the strength lies in the individual states and not in the national government. Another issue that would arise is currency and forms of trade between all units. Additionally, an issue that could be found with a confederation is there wouldn’t be a sense of unity between all the different groups, causing people to be divided and focused on individual areas rather than a whole. The United States started with The Articles of Confederation and while it was the first official unionization for the country, there were many weaknesses in it; we were unable to function efficiently as a whole. A federal system would be more beneficial over a confederation because it would give all provinces the opportunity to send a representative for their area to represent their needs and there would be a balance in power so that no area is being favored over the …show more content…

If Iraq were to be governed by a unitary system it would be beneficial because they already have candidates lined up that would be great leaders for the country. According to “How to Build a Better Iraq”, if there were to be a monarchy, the country would be focused on tradition during a time of change, keeping everyone united (A. Dawisha and K. Dawisha, paragraph 19). The only way it would even be possible for a unitary system to be developed in Iraq would be if it was supported by the majority. If Iraq were to bring on someone with an educated background in scholar as well as business, they could be a driving force to bring stability to the country as well as progression in strengthening the economy for years to

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of A Confederate Government

    336 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is superior to having a strong central government like the union because the needs of individual states are more easily managed. For example; all states have different ideals, populations

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Dbq Research Paper

    633 Words  | 3 Pages

    May 1787. 55 delegates, one long, sweaty conference. The Constitutional Convention was a huge event for the United States. During this convention, the 55 delegates from all states except Rhode Island met up to change their Articles of Confederation. Instead of editing, however, the 55 delegates rewrote the whole thing into the Constitution, which is still used today.

    Read More

  • Revolutionary War Dbq Essay

    1186 Words  | 5 Pages

    During the 17th century, the American colonies declared their independence from Great Britain. They waged war for eight years to obtain their independence, but soon came to a dilemma. The generals and political leaders behind the Revolutionary War were now in charge of thirteen different colonies without a form of government to keep law and order. They were going to have General George Washington become their new leader, however they soon realized that was just like the British monarchy they just seceded from. The Fathers gathered in Pennsylvania to sit together a write a formal government.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    655 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the colonists were still with Great Britain, King George III misused his power. As a result, colonists wrote the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, to the king, to state their separation from Great Britain, to form a new country, the United States of America. After creating a new country, Americans wrote the Articles of Confederation in the year 1777, which they purposely weakened central government, so the abuse of power, wouldn’t exist. This meant the states had all the power. Although this structure of government seemed great, the creators of the Articles quickly realized that with no central government, states weren’t united because they were busy on increasing the growth of only their state.

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Have A Balance Of Power

    530 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of these rough patches was the Articles of Confederation, which taught us that a balance of power is of great importance. We abandoned the Articles of Confederation and adopted a new Constitution because of State powers, and lack of Congressional powers. The fear of a Central Government like Great Britain led The United States away from having such a strong Central Government. So the States were given autonomy to make most decisions & have many powers under early American Government.

    Read More

  • How Did The Iroquois Confederation Influence America

    1526 Words  | 7 Pages

    When trying to form a government for the United States, the Founding Fathers attempted to incorporate the strengths of the many government systems. Besides well-known European precedents — from Greece, Rome, and English common law, among others —Iroquois Confederacy ideas of democracy also assisted in the shaping of the United States government

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Give More Power To The Government Than The States

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation had many things that it could not do, things that were needed in order to have a strong central government. For example, the federal government could decide to wage war, however they had no national army to fight and the states were responsible to gather their own militias. A good example of this is Shays Rebellion. Led by Daniel Shays- a Massachusetts farmer and a war veteran- a group of farmers went to the Springfield Arsenal as

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    354 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalist agreed with the Constitution and its provisions. The wanted to create a strong federal government that will combine both the federal and the states as one nation. One of the weakness that the Articles of Confederation address is that the state had rights to levy taxes and regulate commerce. The states where in charge of the money coming in. The government concern was that if the states did not provide funds for the military they could not do anything about it.

    Read More

  • The Articles Of Confederation Was Full Of Weaknesses

    338 Words  | 2 Pages

    This loose alliance of states formed America 's first national government, but the unified government, itself, had only one component, a one-house congress. There was no president, no executive branch, and no separate judiciary system. State legislature

    Read More

  • Problems Under The Articles Of Confederation

    615 Words  | 3 Pages

    The also chose a federal government because it creates separation of powers so no state powers over another. The federal government should have power when collecting taxes, borrowing money, enforcing laws, and spending money. They were supported by Large landowners judges, lawyers, and

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    1823 Words  | 8 Pages

    This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the Constitution, the United States had the Articles of Confederation. This pre-constitutional government was based off the experiences the colonists had with the King of England. Because of the tyrant nature of the king, the colonists built a government with Strong states, but a weak central government. This resulted in numerous flaws throughout the nation, for example, the government could tax the people or raise an army. Theses flaws also created a rift within the nation forming two parties: the Federalists and the Anti Federalist.

    Read More

  • What Are The Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    675 Words  | 3 Pages

    The reason that the Articles of Confederation established such a weak government was because the colonists were afraid that a strong central government would become tyrannical and oppressive like the British were towards the colonists. However, instead of leading to the downfall of America, the deficiencies that were evident in the Articles of Confederation furthered the definition of the principles of America because the insufficient government of that time voiced a need for a stronger government. To answer this need, the colonists passed the Constitution of the United States. The founding fathers ratified the Constitution in 1787, and it established a much stronger government than the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution founded the laws that would govern America for centuries; it was a crucial factor in the development of the identity of America.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Dual Federalism

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    Under the British unitary system, U.S was a string of colonies. When the revolution implemented, U.S became a confederation under the articles of confederation and when that system verified as abortive, it was transformed into a federal system by the Constitution. This system is preferred for several reasons. The explanations may involve the size of the nation or the miscellany of the partisan divisions. As unitary system in the U.S and the diverse interests of different states made confederation impossible to run over.

    Read More

More about Government In Iraq

Open Document