ipl-logo

Government Vs Central Government Essay

692 Words3 Pages

During the early years of our young country, The United States, the founders faced many difficulties in deciding how best to lead the country. The main question being; how much power should the central government versus the state government have? This brought on more questions that would divide the political thinking of Americans such as; should the central government be involved when citizens rebel against federal policies? How strictly should the constitution be interpreted when deciding how to construct new laws or enforcing existing laws? These and other questions had very different answers for different groups of people which of course started a very distinct divide in political ideologies. One group was the Federalists who supported more authority given to the central government and the idea that the central government has the power to implement and enforce any law that they felt was necessary to perform its duties. The other group was the Republicans who believed that the states should have the most authority and that the central government should mediate between the states. Their viewpoints differed on a variety of things which helped to shape our government even more and set precedents on when the government should intervene in domestic and foreign disputes. The …show more content…

Their decisions on foreign policy and internal disputes helped guide the decisions made by the future leaders. Their constant debate on where most of the power should be concentrated and how the representation should be made helped define the way our government runs even to this day. They two party system though divisive and sometimes destructive was absolutely necessary for this government to run. The republican views seemed to lean more toward the common people which may have been the reason it survived through the Jeffersonian Era of our

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of A Brilliant Solution Inventing The American Constitution By Carol Berkin

    1284 Words  | 6 Pages

    The book, A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution covers many more topics than just the making of the American constitution that Americans know today. It discusses events prior to the constitution that made the founding fathers have to revisit the governmental structure they built. The founding fathers knew that they did not want a big centralized government since that is what they were escaping from in Britain. With that in mind, they gave a lot of power to the state governments, which reinforced the states not wanting to cooperate with each other since no one was really telling them or had the power to tell them to unite under one nationality. But it was a struggle to figure out how to divide up power to not let one section

    Read More

  • XYZ Affair: Events Surrounding The French Revolution

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    This was significant because political power was shifted between parties, peacefully. Also, it caused further conflict between Burr and Hamilton. Each side believed that victory by the other would ruin the nation. Overall, the Federalists wanted strong federal authority to restrain the excesses of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to reduce national authority so that the people could rule more directly through state governments. 56.

    Read More

  • How Did Jefferson And Hamilton Influence The Federal Government

    1098 Words  | 5 Pages

    In George Washington’s Farewell Address (1796), the departing president warned that the creation of political factions, would most certainly lead to “formal and permanent despotism” for the United States, of which he was clearly right. Despite Washington’s words of warning, two of his closest advisors, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, helped to form the factions that led to the dual party system under which the U.S. operates today. Hamilton and Jefferson came to represent the divisions that shaped the early national political landscape, for they had polar opposite views on how the Constitution of the United States should allow, and support, their vision of how the government should be run. Jefferson took a strong position against the creation of a large, central federal government that got itself involved in domestic affairs. According to Jefferson, the role of government should be small and more direct to local citizens, in order to keep the new republic from returning to a tyrannical monarchy.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Under The Articles Of Confederation

    814 Words  | 4 Pages

    After fighting for America’s independence the nation was faced with the situation of developing their own government; with that idea the Articles of Confederation were made as a way to define the government’s structure. With the articles came dysfunction, and a lack of authority. Consequently the dysfunction caused division in the nation, separating the people into two political parties, Federalist and anti-federalist. The parties developed over time and discord, with the development of the Constitution into the Federalist Party and the Democratic Republican Party. The two parties, the Federalist, and the Democratic Republicans, based on their backgrounds and means of income, opposed each other with differing political and economic views.

    Read More

  • The Similarities And Differences Between Hamilton And The Anti-Federalists

    211 Words  | 1 Pages

    Building a new government was fraught with internal challenges as the two parties of the early republic started taking shape. The two parties consisted of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists were headed up by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who supported small government and states rights, this was very different than that of the federalists, which Alexander Hamilton and John Adams supported. The Anti-Federalists, soon to be known as the Democratic-Republicans, did not like the idea of favoring any position that affected the freedom of the people and the state's ability to operate in ways to support individual freedom. They seen the world through the eyes of the working man, opposed to too much governmental power.

    Read More

  • Discussion Of General Laws Of Government Convention 1 Of 1787

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    The discussion of federalism and how power should be separated among state and of the nation government was a key question under discussion during the of general laws of government Convention 1 of 1787 that was got answer to by the Great middle way, but the discussion would last on throughout the most near years after the of general laws of government Convention 1 as people fought to have the of the nation government either stronger or feebler. Back in 1787, the leaders of the american group united by agreement were uncertain how to make a new government heading into the of general laws of government Convention 1. People were unhappy with a too powerful of the nation government, as the people have to amount with a man who have taken power by

    Read More

  • Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalists The Federalists had a better belief on improving the government. They believed in ratification. They knew if you separated the powers of government under three branches, it would protect the rights of people. No one branch has more authority than the other.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton, The Federalists, And The Democratic-Republican Party

    84 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton was a man who strongly believed in a powerful central government. This means he wanted the government to rule and have all the say. Thomas Jefferson was a man who strongly believed in the union of the states with government as a humble leader. The two opposing views caused two political parties to be born, The Federalists, and The Democratic-Republican Party. The Federalists would eventually cease in 1828 and The Democratic-Republican Party would spilt and become the two political parties of today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists

    162 Words  | 1 Pages

    The differences between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans is that they both have different leaders. For Example, the Federalists leader was Alexander Hamilton and they were favored for multiple reasons such as, strong federal government, loosing interpretation of the constitution, they supported the representative government, and the federalists were ruled by the wealthy class. The Democratic-Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson and they were ruled by the people. They were also favored by multiple reasons for example, they had a strong state government, strict interpretation of the constitution, just to name a few. As you can see they both are absolutely different from each other especially in the war against the French.

    Read More

  • The Constitution Pros And Cons

    906 Words  | 4 Pages

    During and immediately after the Revolutionary War, the founding Fathers of America sought to establish a republic on a scale never seen before and to do so had to experiment with new laws and political ideas. Though it was obvious that the first law of the land, The Articles of Confederation, were too weak for the new nation, the development of the new constitution in the late 1780s sparked fierce political debates over the power of the new central government. Even during the debate over the new constitution, it was merely political factions fighting over ideas of government. It would not be until Washington’s first term in office that actual political parties emerged. It was the differences between Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton,

    Read More

  • The Importance Of A Strong Central Government In The Late 18th Century

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the late 18th century, the newly formed United States of America was facing numerous challenges as it sought to establish a stable government that would ensure the protection of its citizens and the preservation of their liberties. The country was divided over the issue of the proper role of government, with some advocating for a strong central government and others favoring a more decentralized system. Alexander Hamilton, one of the nation's founding fathers, recognized the importance of a strong central government and wrote about it in Federalist Paper No. 6. Hamilton argued that the United States was too large and diverse a country to be governed by a weak central government. The country was spread out over a vast area and its citizens had different cultures, interests, and ways of life.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

    Read More

  • Causes Of The XYZ Affair

    1062 Words  | 5 Pages

    Federalist, such as John Adams, were seen as anti-liberty aggressive bureaucrats and the Republicans planned to secede in secret if they took they lead. This plan was never actually taken into affect; or very seriously for that matter. They made Adams out to be some sort of godless heathen with questionable morals and views so people would avoid voting for him. Democratic-Republicans were heated because Adams refused to engage in a war, which they believed was in order because of the French treated them. They were outright furious and many groups protested their president’s decision.

    Read More

  • Dbq Louisiana Purchase Analysis

    1120 Words  | 5 Pages

    The United States developed politically and economically in the late 1700s and early 1800s through individuals who were passionate about the future of America. Although passionate, not all men agreed on the same ideas; this led them to split into two groups. These groups, or political parties, spent much of their time advocating for certain policies, events, or other governmental issues, such as supporting or opposing the current president. Primarily because of the difference in their leaders ' beliefs, the two- party system developed with each party built on different principles; The Federalist 's ideas often clashed with the Democratic-Republican 's. These ideas were originally set in stone and rarely wavered, but under circumstances

    Read More

  • Apush Dbq Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Federalists

    1058 Words  | 5 Pages

    APUSH DBQ #1 Vivian Yang As the colonies of America further differs with their mother country and began to develop into a successful democratic nation, numerous political had changes occurred. With this divergent, a separation of power began to emerge in the form of two political parties. These were the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The parties came to be characterized by certain beliefs, and the usages of those principles would differ during the Jefferson and Madison presidencies.

    Read More

More about Government Vs Central Government Essay

Open Document