Major Rhetorical Strategies in The Grapes Of Wrath
The Grapes of Wrath by novelist John Steinbeck is a classic novel, which can be credited to the way Steinbeck gets across his ideas about migrant workers in the Great Depression-era American Southwest. The book follows the Joad family, who come to California to find work, but instead discover the truth about the hardships in this promised land. Between the chapters about the Joads, interchapters appear; these provide more general accounts of the many migrant workers like the Joads. Steinbeck clearly does not agree with this treatment, and uses this book to help in ending the problem. Steinbeck expertly applies a somber yet passionate tone, personification, and dark imagery to both inform
…show more content…
Steinbeck’s somber yet passionate tone is his most powerful tool, as by writing The Grapes of Wrath this way, he emphasizes how much of a victim the migrants are to their circumstances and the extent of the landowners’ greed. Early on, Steinbeck inflicts his passion into an account of a pawnbroker taking advantage of a migrant farmer. “We could have saved you, but you cut us down, and soon you will be cut down and there’ll be none of us to save you.” (94) This statement by the farmer has somewhat somber connotations, as he refers to both having misfortune, but the intensity in which he threatens the pawnbroker is unmistakable. As a result of the pawnbroker being so cruel, no mercy will be shown if they ever end up in an unfortunate circumstance. A more direct example comes from Steinbeck himself. “If you who own the things people must have could understand this, you might preserve yourself. If you could separate causes from results, if you could know that Paine, Marx, Jefferson, Lenin, were results, not causes, you might survive. But that you cannot know. For the quality of owning freezes you forever into “I”, and cuts you off forever from the “we”.” (166) In this statement, Steinbeck directly threatens the rich for
American author, John Steinbeck, in an American realist novel titled “Grapes of Wrath” (1939), demonstrates how man gets stuck being controlled by a bigger power. Steinbeck supports his claim through the use of rhetorical strategies, such as, personification, repetition, and dialogue. Steinbeck's purpose is to demonstrate how man gets stuck in the relentless cycle of powerlessness. Steinbeck uses a desperate tone and old-fashioned language to appeal to the readers of the 20th century. Steinbeck begins by making the Bank come to life through personification.
Steinbeck’s, The Grapes of Wrath follows the difficult journey of the Joad family as the attempt to move to California. Interwoven into this story is small paragraphs that deliver smaller, individual messages. One such paragraph is paragraph 11. In this paragraph Steinbeck speaks of how the farms have changed over time. This juxtaposition of times seems insignificant and unrelatable to those who don’t look deeply into this short, quick story.
In Chapter Three of John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck explores the migrant workers’ journey, revealing that although foes and adversaries rail into them, both those with purpose to injure and those blind to their presence, shattering and flinging them off course, abrupt changes in their course cause no true harm; migrant workers come face to face with success at the close of their journey and ultimately they plant a seed, an idea, a revolution that will blossom along their voyage. Steinbeck establishes a metaphorical journey in Chapter Three, shaping the migrants as turtles, to hail them as the jewels of American society, and to reveal their true characteristics, which are usually muddled with dirty connotations and stereotypes.
Steinbeck also evokes feelings of compassion through his description of a young boy who “went into convulsions and died” due to a weak diet of “fruit, beans, and little else,” for the boy suffered a premature death, and there was little he could do to change his fate
In the novel written by John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath, a myriad of allusions to the Bible were made by using metaphorically Biblical characters, actions, and a journey to the “promised land” in an attempt to draw the reader’s attention to the struggles of the migrant people with the allusions to the familiar text of the Bible, while Steinbeck remained true to his own beliefs. While Steinbeck had the effrontery to approach the Bible in an unconventional and possibly adverse way, he managed to come across as well versed on the matter. Although Steinbeck clearly had known the passages of the Bible, he had developed his own views on religion. As stated in The Grapes of Wrath Bloom’s Guides “Looked at in one way, these allusions seem patternless,
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck is a story that details the life of a poor Oklahoma family during the dust bowl. Before almost every chapter about the Joads, there is a vignette about an unnamed group of people that symbolize something that will happen to the Joads in the next chapter. This symbolism helps to demonstrate the Joads’ story and shows why the Joads’ story happened the way it did. In Chapter 21, Steinbeck shows the lack of decisions and individual thought by the migrants as well as the natives.
We-- No. The bank, the monster owns it. You'll have to go” (46). This instance depicts a point during this period when several families had their land taken away from them by the bank because they could no longer support themselves. By providing information regarding what was going on with the general population at this time, the reader is clearly able to see and understand Steinbeck’s argument.
Steinbeck is showing that people ultimately will protect their best interest at any cost to
In The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck follows the Joad family as they suffer the hardships caused by the Dust Bowl in the 1930’s. The most important lesson people can learn from the novel is the value of a human life. Although the 1930’s was a low point in American society, the ill-treatment of human beings is still relevant today. Just like Jim Casy’s philosophy, it is important to fight for the rights of the people and their dignity. There are several examples of oppression in The Grapes of wrath.
The Grapes of Wrath, one of his most well-known works is exemplary of Steinbeck’s pursuit to bring attention to the lower class and their struggles during the Great Depression, and to hold those who caused the Depression accountable, as seen in his quote “I want to put a tag of shame on the greedy bastards who are responsible for this [the Great Depression and its effects]. I’ve done my damnedest to rip a reader’s nerves to rags” (“The Grapes of Wrath”]. Published in 1939, the novel follows a family of tenant farmers who are forced to turn their land over to the banks and journey across the Dust Bowl to the ‘promised land’ of California (“John Ernst Steinbeck”). The Grapes of Wrath became highly debated and criticized, and many accused Steinbeck of dramatizing the conditions portrayed in the novel to prove a point; however, he had actually underplayed the conditions, feeling that “exact descriptions would have gotten in the way of his story.” Though embraced by the working class, critics condemned the novel as a ‘pack of lies’ and ‘Communist propaganda,’ and the book was banned from 1939 to 1941.
The spirit of unity emerges as the one unfailing source of strength in Steinbeck’s novel. He tries and accomplishes in conveying it to the reader, through imagery. On multiple accounts,
This sentence uses figurative language to develop the idea that even holding on to nothing was hard for the migrant workers. Steinbeck used this quote to allow the reader to visualize how indescribably difficult the migrant workers struggles are, to the point where they can barely hold on to nothing. This effect would not be possible without the use of the intercalary chapter to assist the reader in getting a deeper understanding of migrant
The tone of chapter 11 in John Steinbeck's, “The Grapes of Wrath,” is sympathetic, sad and hopeless. His word choice and syntax show how the sad houses were left to decay in the weather. His use of descriptive words paints a picture in the reader's mind. As each paragraph unfolds, new details come to life and adds to the imagery. While it may seem unimportant, this intercalary chapter shows how the effects of the great depression affected common households.
Community, so close to Steinbeck’s heart, is exaggerated in every possible way in this novel. In an eloquent way, he molds the reader’s hearts to believe that a communal soul (or oversoul) is best for the people as well. Truly, the language and rhetoric applied in order to encourage this philosophy is unlike any other writing by Steinbeck, or any other socialist writer for that
In The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, the chapters alternate between two perspectives of a story. One chapter focuses on the tenants as a whole, while the other chapter focuses specifically of a family of tenants, the Joads, and their journey to California. Chapter 5 is the former and Steinbeck does an excellent job of omniscient third person point of view to describe the situation. Chapter 5’s main idea is to set the conflict and let the readers make connections between Steinbeck’s alternating chapters with foreshadowing. Steinbeck is effectual in letting readers make connections both to the world and the text itself with the use of exposition, and symbolism.