Joseph Lelyveld was born on April 5th, 1937. He graduated from Harvard College in 1958, received a Master’s degree from the Columbia School of Journalism in 1960, and received a Fulbright Scholarship. In 1962, he was first hired as a copy editor, but soon became a foreign correspondent for the New York Times. He became the executive editor in 1994 and retired in 2001, after nearly 40 years of working for the Times. Joseph Lelyveld is also a reviewer for the New York Review of Books. His own works include House of Bondage: A South African Black Man Exposes in His Own Pictures and Words the Bitter Life of His Homeland Today, and Omaha Blues: A Memory Loop. Lelyveld received the Pulitzer Prize for Non-Fiction in 1986 for Move Your Shadow: South Africa, Black and White, a book based on his reporting in the 1960’s and 1980’s from Johannesburg, South Africa.
Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle with India, is a novel about Mahatma Gandhi, which is the father of the Indian independence movement. He dedicated 20 years of his life fighting discrimination in South Africa. It was there that he created his concept of satyagraha, a non-violent way of protesting against discrimination. The word satyagraha derives from Sanskrit words “satya” meaning truth
…show more content…
I enjoyed reading the book, but there were a lot of times where I had to look up a word, because the author writes in a very sophisticated and complex language. Personally, I was intrigued by Mahatma Gandhi and found Lelyveld’s biography very informative and resourceful. If you are the kind of person that likes to see the good in people, this is a book for you. After finishing the book, I felt as if though I knew everything there is to know about Gandhi. Unfortunately, I was disappointed by the fact that the author decided to focus on the heroic side of Gandhi and forgot to mention all the horrible things he’s
I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in the truths of our forefathers. I will be honest there are some setbacks, like how it seems to drag on sometimes, yet it still managed to kept me interested. The book and the author both have my
Overall from my personal perspective on the book I found it quite convincing. The book had made me more intrigued in the assassination of JFK even though at times I felt a bit exhausted from trying to process what all the book was stating. While the author has his own personal belief he provides honest and factual information about the case. All of the points and evidence he provided made a exceptional argument for either side but his point made the most sense. The book is also well organized for example how each chapter specifically looks at a specific topic which ultimately keeps things organized.
I would highly suggest reading this book since it will make you realize that society isn’t always good. It will make you truly think of how Society was in that time period. It really influences you and let’s you know higher and better vocabulary. This book is confusing to read but overall it’s a good book. If you really like high-level reading then you should go for this book definitely.
Not only that but he succeed in filling this book with the energies of what it felt like to be in these stories. He uses intelligent and witty writing to keep the reader interested throughout the entirety of the book. In The Duel, the reader got to see where both sides were coming from that ultimately led to Hamilton’s death. In The Silence, he gives you a chance to really understand how congress failed to bring any kind of reconciliation about the subject of slavery and even making it to where nothing could be done about it until Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation. All in all, I feel the author achieved a great success in the writing of this book.
His experience with being born in Harlem and his role in the Civil Rights Movement influenced his writing to bring awareness to the events occurring in the black community and the reasoning behind them. With this, he draws attention to the idea of the lack of individualism black people faced in that time period which unfortunately continues today. Lastly, although they both were written in the same time period, they effectively demonstrate two different
Analysis In April of 1968 the great siren and champion of the civil rights movement’s life was snuffed out by an assassin’s bullet. He came onto the scene in the late 50s with a Gandhi-esque inspired ideology of passive-resistance
Gandhi was given too much credit for the success of the Indian Independence Movement. Discuss if this statement true? This statement is true to a lesser extent. It has been noted throughout the years that Gandhi has been, the so called, savior of India.
The Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Race Beat: The Press, the Civil Rights Struggle, and the Awakening of a Nation, reveals how journalist and their stories changed the nation’s ideas about the civil rights movement. Written by Gene Roberts, a journalism professor, and Hank Klibanoff, editor of the Atlanta Journal, The Race Beat uses primary resources such as interviews, correspondence between journalist, and articles to defined their views about the importance of this journalist. In a particular part of the book, the authors describe the hatred and resistance the white reporters face while covering the story at Selma. Unlike other sources on the topic of television and the Civil Rights movement The Race Beat focuses on the journalists themselves
He had seen firsthand how African Americans experienced brutality growing up. He had seen this when Jess Alexander Helms a police officer brutalized a black woman, and dragged her to the jail house. He had explained it as “the way a caveman would club and drag his sexual prey”. This shows how little rights African Americans had in these days because he was unable to do anything. All of this happened while other African American individuals walked away hurriedly.
Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.
He showed how black people were not seen as equals and how people reacted to a black person being in a white person’s territory. Both sources showed the challenge of being different. The challenge of what it’s like to live as a minority. How people can be cruel and condescending just by a person’s race and change is not easy to accept and achieve. Change is not something that can easily be accepted by everyone.
Through his own experience of slavery from a child to adult, he exposed the brutal nature of slavery and revealed underside of how slave owners maintain such terrible regime. In the institution of slavery, whites gain their power over slavery by the practice of violent and cruel treatment, deliberately keep slaves ignorant of basic facts about slave themselves and the intention of enslaving them. Slaveholders in the south separated slave’s family, slaves will become vulnerable and lost consciousness or hope in the absence of family love. Slaveholder could keep them without facing any lawful punishments. Basis on these, whites can make black slaves lost their individuality and qualities as human, they will have not have consciousness aware their place in the society.
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is a good book so far. This book sometimes make you wonder what other things have been taken from black people without them knowing what was going on. In this book it talks about how black people were treated and how they really didn 't get that much attention when they were in the hospital. When Henrietta told the doctor that their was something wrong with her the doctor didn 't do anything about but if she woulda been white the doctors would gone and check what wrong with her and try to find a way to cure her. This is something that I didn 't like how the white people treated the black people and i did not like the fact that the doctor took Henrietta cells even though the husband said he did not want them to take Henrietta cell.
Ellis did an impressive job at balancing the book and not showing bias towards any of the prominent figures. Although the book provides a superb representation of the forefathers in each chapter, some chapters are more effective than others. The book also tends to wander off and get too in-depth in some area so it becomes a bit wearisome. During some areas the narration fails to sustain my attention and spark my interest. Simultaneously, I would not say that it’s dull or boring, as it gives an considerable amount of information and I learned a lot from it.
Mohandas Gandhi is one of the greatest nonviolent activists ever. Gandhi came up with the word ahimsa, which meant nonviolence. He also introduced to the world the word satyagraha, which meant peaceful civil disobedience. In 1930 Gandhi and a group of followers began a march of more than 200 miles. Three and a half weeks later they made it to their destination, the sea.