The stories of the Greek gods provided entertainment to the people. People found amusement in the stories of heroes confronting challenging tasks and even in Zeus 's attempts to hide his affairs from his wife, Hera. The Greeks tried to avoid the unexplainable things that they could not comprehend in their culture. The mysteries of the universe that left humans baffled instigated fear, and to
Darius sent an army to Athens, and the confrontation of the Greeks and Persians would be known as the Battle of Marathon. Although they were on their own, the Athenians won, much to their surprise. This victory was significant, because it meant that the Persians, although powerful, could be beaten. This however, was not the end as king Darius again sent troops a few years later. This time though, Darius began the attack in the North against the Spartans, who fell.
Antony is Julius Caesar's right hand man and also gets in power by after Caesar is killed. After Brutus gave Antony permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral he decided to use that to his advantage at convince the people to go against Brutus using a pathos. This was a much better approach to the situation then Brutus who used gravitas and logos. Antony was trying to use a more relatable and empathetic approach to his speech and he was also trying to explain that Caesar cared about his people. He did this by saying that “when the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.”
Montaigne references several different authors throughout the duration of “On Friendship,” as noted previously. Instead of translating when quoting these authors, Montaigne decides to keep the text in Greek or Latin each time. This is a bold move to take as an author because one cannot know whether or not his audience will be able to understand the language or not. While one can say the audience will be able to translate the text, they may not have access to those types of material. By not translating the material into the dominant language of the region, Montaigne shows the audience that he undoubtedly knows the Greek or Latin language very well.
Greek civilization had a strong influence on the Roman Empire, Greek and Roman structural planning have long been associated on account of the similitudes between the sanctuaries and option structures that two evolutions made. Roman structural planning was frequently influenced affected by Greece however the Romans also separated to make a different personality, they look so much similar. Then again, that does not mean there is no distinction at all between the 2 styles. The basic clarification for such a great deal of normal appearance is this. Greek draftsmen with its human progress started to exist before Roman development.
Another example of having too much pride is some types of couples. Couples sometimes don’t trust each other or may have way too much pride, thats the main reason why couples break up is because they focus so much on their pride than working on their love more. In the Bible, “The Book of Daniel” to be exact , Daniel gives us a story of Nebuchadnezzar 's Pride, this story tells us that King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon was filled with pride. He held immense power over his kingdom.
The war led to Greek cities concentrating less on fighting and more on intellectual growth and cities such as Ionia pioneered in research revolving around metaphysics. There were social and political consequences of the war that affected all futuristic activities of the Greek people. The social and political systems of Athens and Sparta after the war affected the way they conducted their civil war as they avoided an all-out-war and took certain small strategic attacks on each other. Socially, the Greek states after the war supported minor rebellions and politically, they rallied against taking one city at a time from their
He did what others would dare to never do, kill the king to save Rome. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus has the more effective speech because he is more persuasive with motive, pathos, and character trait; he provides a powerful speech that is more loyal and humbling to the country of Rome. The literary term motive, applies to the reason a character does something, and Brutus and Marc Antony both show motive in their speeches. For instance, Marc Antony’s motive for refusing to read Julius Caesar’s will is to avoid
While serving as lord of the gods and men, Zeus functioned as the supreme ruler and judge over law and order. Despite his views on justice and virtue, he frequently asserted his dominance and took part in many sexual affairs. Traditionally, affairs like these would be contra to order, yet Zeus seemed to bypass the rules. The Greeks who worshipped the gods viewed the gods as holy beings that are supreme. I believe that due to Zeus’s function as a god, his supremacy, and his power, Greeks along with other gods were frightened to discuss the problems with these affairs and therefore had to accept that Zeus could do as he pleased.
The replies from the Athenian envoy, shows that everything the Athenians do is for the interest and benefit of their empire. They are just after more power and they will do anything to attain it, even if it means engaging in war and killing innocent people. However, when it comes to the Melians, it’s evident that they believe in morality and actions of justice. Although they are considered to be inferior and weak than the Athens, they believe in fighting for justice instead of throwing all
The Attic Orators were professional speech makers that they had three types of speeches, which were the forensic one about lawsuits, the deliberative one about an effort to convince the Assembly, and the epideictic one about praise or blame of an individual. The speakers had a perfect rhetoric, and the types of the oratories had a foundation of rhetoric that the audience were influenced by them. Through the feature of rhetoric, the audience were convinced by the speakers and their speeches, but were the subjects and/or claims of the speeches true and/or reflect the truth? It might be true or false, or maybe fake. Because of another feature of rhetoric, the speeches were perceived with suspicion.
Maitin-Shepards’ essay is a better scholarly source than Istvans’ because he has more credibility, it is located in a text book, and the content is more cultured. Maitin-Shepard has more of a stable/logical background in the topic of morality and artificial intelligence while Istvan has more of an opinionated background. Maitin-Shepards essay is located in a textbook which makes it more credible because the school would not give us a book about false information, unless it were clearly stated as false information. Istvans essay is on a website, which is the Huffington post so it makes it seem more credible than it truly is because Huffington post is a popular name. Maitin-Shepards content is more believable because it is more factual than Istvans because Istvan is mostly writing about his opinion.
Alexander the Great is one of the most famous people in our world’s history. He achieved great challenges no other man could do. Alexander himself said, “There is nothing impossible to him who will try.” His achievments prove this quote without a doubt. Alexander of Macedon was born in 356 BCE to King Philip and his wife Olympia.
Terracotta calyx-krater (mixing bowl) is a vase attributed to the Konnakis Group. The vase dates back to the late classical period between 350-325 BC. The item was made from fired clay and was painted. It is attributed to the southern Italy vase painters. Painted on this vase is a picture of a comical character performing a scene from a play that was famous in southern Italy during that period called phlyax.
Rosivach contends that the Athenians continuous inhabitance of Attica was not originally related to Erechteus – the archaic king of Athens – or a genesis from the earth. The author reveals the earliest written example of the Athenians identifying themselves as Erecthediai being in Homer’s ‘Iliad’, highlighting a vast time period in which contrary beliefs were held. Erechteus was initially viewed as a god, rather than a human king, providing no evidence that he was a direct ancestor of the Athenian people. Rosivach states that an autochthonous mentality may have been adopted to assert superiority over the Dorian Spartans after 470 BCE. The author further argues that the definition of ‘autochthony’ is contentious.