Ancient Greek Political Thought Analysis

3464 Words14 Pages

ANCIENT POLITICAL THOUGHT
NATURE OF GREEK AND ROMAN POLITICAL THOUGHT
Nature of Greek Political Thought
Nature of Greek political thought is concern for the central rules controlling the universe (Wanlass 1953: 40). The idea is focused on the universal rules whereas the nature is the law and that the universe as the product of creative reason.
The State for the Greeks is being necessary for man’s highest development was a product of nature and that man and state are bound together in living as a whole (Wanlass 1953: 41). During this time the concept of laws are based on nature and where the state and its citizen are bound to live together and no separation are occurred between the two.
Nature of Roman Political Thought
Nature of Roman political …show more content…

Aristocracy is a form of government where the few are governing, the rulers in aristocracy are wise and well-educated because they came from the rich families.
Aristotle
Aristotle’s works focused on the rule of law rather than applying the idea of Plato’s rule of men. He relied on the rule of law or in today’s politics is call constitutional government and also he agreed that law laws might not provide absolute justice because of their generality however this generality can results to an impartial treatment, avoidance of personal desire which is the essence of good government (Wanlass 1953: 63). The rule of law does not result to an absolute justice because of its generality rather it avoid self-interest and the generality that resulted to an impartiality of treatment.
He believed that man is destined to lead a political life by his inherent nature (Wanlass 1953: 63). This idea of Aristotle viewed that man is deemed to enter in political life whether an individual does not …show more content…

In using passive obedience he clearly stated that it is needed to maintain the order in state and society.
In the church, he said that the ultimate source of its authority in the general council not in the pope and place the civil power over the ecclesiastical authority (Wanlass 1953: 156). Luther attacked the church because of its hierarchy and by stating that ecclesiastical is over secular. General council for him is the source of authority rather than pope because of applying the Teutonic idea of democracy.
He then said the state is also sacred and the power of the state receives in God alone (Wanlass 1953: 157). He then began to discuss that state is also divine in nature because it also came from God and the ruler of the state is also sacred. On the other hand, Luther had no sympathy in equality because for him in a civil state inequality is a necessity (Wanlass 1953: 157).
John

Open Document