In the history of the world, we began to see that humanity began to become more advanced in technological advancements which led to what we now know as war. In particular, the Romans and the Greeks were two different civilizations which took their technological advancements for war to a whole new level. At around 1200 BCE, the Greeks had developed metal suit armors. These armors included metal helmets, corsets, spears, and shields. With the use and interpretation of the picture illustrated in Worlds Together Worlds Apart, the book states that the Greeks had a huge defensive advantage using armor, but still faced defeat against the land incursions that destroyed the Mycenaean palaces. On the other hand, we then have a whole different society that is also known for their technological …show more content…
The Roman civilization are also noted and recognized because of their civilized warfare tactics and as well as their armory that was used in war. In the picture entitled “Soldiers versus Barbarians” in Worlds Together Worlds Apart, technological advancements of a Roman soldier included how they also had helmets and chest plates. Aside from their advancement in armory, the Romans and the Greeks collectively grew stronger as they expanded their innovations and discoveries of new weapons and strategic warfare tactics.
In the aspect of Greek weaponry, the Hoplites were equipped with long spears which were referred to as the Doru. Usually, they were around 7 to 9 feet in length, therefore creating a deadly strike from a far distance of the Hoplite using the Doru. Furthermore, the deadly spear had more features rather than it just being long. The Doru came with a curved spearhead and had a spiked point, which was known to be a Sauroter on
The Roman empire was one of the most powerful to ever exist and influenced all of Europe with their designs and battle strategies, even today Their impact is evident. The Romans changed European first century warfare forever with their superior army and tactics. The Romans were powerful due to the sheer number of soldiers they possessed, the equipment given to each soldier, and the training each member received to prepare for battle. Of course the Romans had innovations of their own but it was not above them to borrow techniques and styles from other cultures, like the Greeks for instance. The Romans also took equipment types from other European cultures as well, like plate armor.
The use of technology once hindered societies ability to adjust to new situations; however, technology has now
Early Romans wore very simple styles of jewelry that represented Greek culture, but as their empire grew and more countries were conquered, the wealth of the Romans grew. This meant that their jewelry became more intricate and colourful and that every conquered civilisation’s way of life influenced the type of jewelry they made. The Romans managed to collect different ideas from their many conquered nations. They adapted them for their use and the use of future generations after them.
Finally, the technology and weapons utilized by the Macedonians enabled them to be better equipped in battle than other armies. It also allowed them to sustain fewer casualties and losses. Peter Connolly and numerous other historians agree that advanced technology such as pikes, sarissas, shields, swords, helmets, and chest plates were either invented, developed, or modified to fit the needs of the Macedonians and allow the army to defeat enemy armies like the Persians and Greeks (Conolly 60-61). Arrian in his book gives proof of how Alexander’s men were often better equipped than those they were facing during his recount of the Battle of the Granicus, where the Macedonians gained the advantage “both through their superior strength and military
The trireme had now acquired a new total of 170 to 180 rowers and a length of 121 feet; Greek warships had been improved to a speed that they had not reached before which helped them during battles. Later on, carpenters also came up with the quadrireme, but it was not nearly as common as biremes and triremes. Most men on the ships and men in general back in Ancient Greece fought with spear and sword. For example, Greek foot soldiers who were also known as hoplites always had armor and a shield equipped and their dory ready. The dory was a long spear with a leaf shaped iron tip and a wooden shaft.
From the Athenian acropolis to the temples of Thebes, Panhellenism has been prevalent throughout Greece, from the age of heroes to the Ottoman conquest of Greece. Developed naturally, the enduring virtues and ideas acted as a vessel for the ideal western civilization that modern powers accordingly look up to as a template for enlightenment. The basis of Panhellenic development grew from Greek cities’ independence its values derived from it, which can be seen in Homer’s Iliad.
The weapons that Greece used were spears and a shield. Rome used swords and shields. The Roman soldiers became the supreme predator of their day, unmatched in battle and relentless in conquest. The heavily outnumbered Greek warriors were called hoplites. They used superior tactics, training and arms to defeat two massive invasions.
They also had a javelin and bows and arrows. The soldiers were trained to use the weapons, and they would practice when they were not fighting. The Roman soldiers used catapults that could throw huge rocks and knock down walls. They also had crossbows that were called ballistas that shot arrows that were the size of spears. They often practiced with swords made of wood.
At the beginning of the First Millennium The Romans and the people of the Han both extensively used technology to better themselves and eventually all of humanity. The Han empire in China placed more value on technology and technological enhancements then the Roman Empire did, proven by the constant concern of the Han dynasty over the indifference and almost disregard of the Romans. The Han were more accepting and open to technological advancements because they valued the farmers, and common people who they believed helped benefit society however, the Roman were only concerned with the upper class due to their dividing and conflicting social classes of Particans and Plebeians therefore their view of technology was that it was considered unimportant.
“Sparta is famous for its advances in military strategy and strong military might, closely matching its patron god” (Landrum). This says that the Greeks had military advancements. The US has military advancements too. “The trireme was a light wooden ship, highly manoeuvrable and fitted with a bronze battering ram at the bow which could disable enemy vessels. Thirty-five metres long and with a 5 metre beam, some 170 rowers (thetes - drawn from the poorer classes) sitting on three levels could propel the ship up to a speed of 9 knots” (Cartwright).
The Roman armies used to be comprised of volunteers but after being defeated, they were determined to make their army better. They did this through vigorous trainings. Roman soldiers called legionaries, were forced to march for long distances carrying heavy loads. Every year, senior military officers, called Tribunes, would select the strongest men to be part of the army. In the end, the Romans became professional in fighting and had one of the most disciplined armies.
The hoplite was formed due to the alliances that the city states were forming with each other. At the time they didn’t have trained armies so normal citizens, wealthy ones so they could afford weapons and armor, decided to take it upon themselves to protect the state. This was the case for most city states but it was not the case for the Spartans, who are arguably the most famous hoplites. The Spartans were a much more militaristic city state and this result in them being one of the most successful armies in ancient Greece. To give some illustration to this, Paul Anthony Rahe states, “by turning the city into a camp, the polis into an army, and the citizen into a soldier.”
Social and political considerations is what determined religious activities. Technology, led to changes in armor, which led to changes in military tactics and strategies. This led to the inclusion of a fighting force comprised of non-aristocrats resulting in the rise of tyrants within many Greek states. Hoplite phalanx war fare began with changes to the burial process involving armor. Armor was now handed down from father to son, appropriated from fallen enemies, or won in competitions.
The Greek’s Phalanx and the Roman’s Legion were both very powerful battle tactics. They were both recognized as one the most powerful battle tactics ever. In fact, it has been debated which tactic is better. The Greek’s Phalanx was powerful on flat land, but much less handy on rough terrain. The Roman’s Legion was a powerful 5,000 man army that would charge the enemy.
-ANCIENT GREEK- WARRIORS THESIS Ancient Greek warriors were great fighters because they had excellent weapons, technology, and training. Guiding Question What made Greek warriors such great fighters? Ancient Greek Training ● A boy went to a training camp at the age of 7 to become a hoplite.