Society would not be as it is unless it had some form of cultural norms or religious rites that identified that society. From ancient times to as far back as the first human civilizations our world has brought forth highly ritualistic traditions, customs, and codes of law that has set apart one people from another. From social to religious rites of passage, we can find that within most ancient agrarian civilizations, women has faced many disparities that would be seen as barbaric members of most modern industrial societies. This reality was profound in both the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. Because of the heavy patriarchal control of these two people, little is know about how women influences any of these societies without the ever looming presences of there patriarchal counterparts. In reference to both of these societies, Greek women were able to hold religious positions and engaged in highly stylized religious rites that Roman could only dream of participating in; however, Roman woman enjoyed a great amount of social mobility and freedom that was not afforded to the ancient Greek women. In fact, most Roman women of antiquity could carry out normal social affairs and transaction …show more content…
Segregation amongst the social classes was more rigid, and women were not allowed any religious and political positions as Greek women did. In fact, the only religious position that women were allowed to take was that of the Vestal Virgins. Notwithstanding the seemingly harsh disparities that faced the women of Rome they were allowed more social mobility outside of the home. Women were even regarded in a higher esteem then Greek women were. Why was this the case for the women of Rome and not the Greeks? This question can be answered if we first find out what Roman society felt about its
Through the debate, we learn about the history of Rome culture, the Roman society, the view of women in the Roman society, and the roles they had. In 195 B.C.E., Rome was facing economic oppression from the war. Because of the monetary hardship, the Oppian law was passed in hopes to decrease conflict between the rich and the poor. At this time in Roman society, gender role distinctions and class distinctions existed, and gender roles greatly affected laws and the government. Women were considered weak and viewed as prizes of men that determined their status and place in society.
Her response here shows that Spartan women were brought up to be tough like their male counterparts. Spartan women had more freedoms than the Athenians. For example, unlike the “housebound life of the Athenian matron” , Spartan women were able to go out in public and even interact with other men. Despite both being Greek, women had very different roles to play in their societies. These differences
Although all citizens in Ancient Greece had stereotypes applied to them; one group directly oppressed by these stereotypes was women. While men in Greece were regarded as the leaders of their households, women were required to stay loyal to their husbands and remain
Spartan women could have almost anything job other than priests and anything to do with military or government. Women in Sparta were also very educated in writing, art, and athletics. Women in Athens could not go in public, they couldn’t vote, the only education they got was weaving and spinning, and they couldn’t own property. They were however able to use the court for legal issues. They were supposed to stay at home at watch the kids and cook food.
Ancient Greece was not a high point for gender equality in history. The duties and obligations of men and women were entirely different, and the rules were often much more complicated and stringent for women. For example, a female companion or the man who “owned” them had to accompany them, and if they wished to visit the theatre, the law forced them to sit in the back rows. The laws also banned them from watching any genre besides tragedy. However, even in an era of such gender discrimination, Homer includes many examples of strong, independent women, including both goddesses and mortal women.
Expected Male and Female Gender Roles and Consequences for Failing to Adhere in Rome Every citizen influences the prosperity of Rome and the gender roles assigned to females and males all contribute to the ideals and culture of the Roman society. The necessity to curb wealth, the lack of citizen children and the need for Rome to dominate are among the reasons that gender roles were so defined. The Romans are strict with their expected gender roles and put laws in place to provide consequences for individuals who refused to adhere to those laws. There were consequences, by aid of legislation, for those who went against social norms and these laws were used to initiate remorse among the Roman population. Thus, both males and females that deviated
During the Roman Republic and Roman Empire, women were restricted to domestic life in a male-dominated society. Egypt’s capital, Alexandria, formally passed into Roman rule in 80BC , and was the greatest of the Roman provincial capitals, with a population of 300,000. In comparison, the Italian city of Pompeii had a population of only 20,000. To examine the role of women in Roman society, I will need to investigate the literature that survived from the period. This essay will compare and contrast the role of women in Alexandria and Pompeii.
” Once the government’s disrespect for these people was shown, they lost a lot of respect for themselves, contributing to people’s anger and makes them distraught. Rome was a little different, though. They would accept almost anyone as a citizen (except for slaves or freed slaves.) Rome would allow children of freed slaves, and even women, and though they could not hold public office or vote, they could own their own property. This proves that they had some level of respect for women at least, very much unlike many other ancient civilizations including the Athenian.
In ancient times, there is a general sense that women were simply items and slaves to their husbands. Ancient Greece specifically has a renowned reputation of favoring men. Men possessed the dominant role in public affairs and events while most women were pressured to stay at home. Very few records extensively discuss women; the records focus mostly on men. Despite the lacking records, it is certain how ancient Greeks viewed their women and their relationships with their male counterparts.
Clearly, Sparta and Hellenistic women had more freedom and social rights than Athens women. The reason of how this phenomena occurred might be that at that period of time, Athens had the largest population of Attica. This indicates that the in this male community in Athens, the males could carry on almost all of the responsibilities of a society while the women could just stay at home and serve the men while they took part in public life. However, in Sparta and the Hellenistic era which there were not so much people around, women’s role would be more than simply taking care of household and children, they would need to shoulder some responsibility for their society, which brought along freedom and rights for
Many Roman morals of that time were simply translations and adaptations of Greek morals and philosophy which Romans incorporated into their culture. The elite especially mimicked the viewpoints and ideals of Greek culture, since it was seen as superior (Edwards 2002: 22-24). The historians of the time praised almost all things Greek: playwriters and poets sought to mimic and, in some cases, copy Greek poetry; Greek art was popular in elite villas; and Greek philosophy was studied endlessly (Edwards 2002: 22-24). In this way, Rome organized itself to function morally in a system originally developed within completely different economic and political systems of Greece. From a sexual morality perspective, the Greek system of morality kept women completely under the control of the men, even if the men were away fighting wars or trading with distant peoples.
In the Greece civilization, ladies were not given a position, they were thought to be not as much as slaves. Rome’s general public was separated into
The part and role in which women played in their society significantly varies throughout the world, depending on the place and region. However, they all share a common similarity in which men are the most dominant in every aspect of society, therefore, men are perceived to have more authority and power than women. In the comparison of ancient civilizations and modern times, it is significant how the rights and roles of women have positively changed, giving women more chances and opportunities in society, therefore, influencing and impacting society in many beneficial ways as well as, nowadays, women and men are finally seen as
In the Ancient world, much like today, each society exercised, according to their custom, different treatment towards women. Today, unlike in the Ancient world, women enjoy more freedom, rights, and equality. In this essay, the status of women in ancient Egypt will be compared to the status of women in ancient Rome. Academic sources will be relied on to provide the necessary actualities when one investigates ancient lives and cultures. The legal status of women in society, the different roles that each unique nation’s women played, and the possible education permitted and occupations available to these women will be discussed, as well as, their domestic atmospheres will be critically compared in this short essay to demonstrate the different treatment (if there were a difference) of women in both these imposing periods of ancient history.
There were several different roles that Greek women had during that time period. For instance, Greek women were responsible for most of the duties around the house, which involved cooking, cleaning, serving, and mothering. On page 76 of the play, Lysistrata, Calonice explains why