When considering how a person should act in order to gain the most honor or respect, there are varying opinions. Some may say that you simply must be a good person, but how does one constitute what a good person looks like? The Greek word arete represents what the ideal person in Greek society was. Sometimes arete is loosely translated to mean virtue, however this can be misconstrued in the English language. “Virtue, at least in modern english, is almost entirely a moral word; arete on the other hand is used indifferently in all the categories and means simply ‘excellence’” (H.D.F Kitto, The Greeks, 1952). Because arete is explained by different languages as different things, it makes sense that arete would then be viewed at variance by contrasting …show more content…
Godshalk’s Presentation on Greece) and perfection of the soul. Jesus agreed with Socrates that this was the most important aspect of arete, as well as focusing on oneself before the opinions of others (The Sermon on the Mount). However, when it came to this opinion of others, Jesus and Socrates did not agree. Jesus mentions, “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you” (The Sermon on the Mount). Here, Jesus is emphasizing the exact opposite of most of the original views of arete that stem from excellence and being accepted by others (H.D.F Kitto, The Greeks, 1952). He is saying that it is positive to be put down by others and that because of this, one knows that he is gaining true arete and focusing on himself and his own soul. Not only does Jesus say that is is good that people look down on one who is gaining true arete, but he encourages said person to rejoice in the persecution put upon them, “because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you” (The Sermon on the Mount). Socrates, in his idea of arete, decided that it was not good for others to look down on a person for their way of thinking, which contrasts Jesus’ teachings. Although, Socrates did agree with Jesus that one should not let the opinions of others affect them. This is backed up by …show more content…
Socrates begged that the citizens of Athens “not...care for [their] persons or [their] property more than for the perfection of [their] souls” and also reminded them that “virtues does not come from money, but from virtue comes money and all other good things to man” (“Apologia”). Jesus similarly taught that wealth came from the truth and that virtue came above all else, but he had a different meaning of wealth. While Socrates was teaching about physical wealth such as money, fame, and other worldly possessions, Jesus was considering wealth to be more metaphysical, such as entrance into the Kingdom of God. Also, Jesus was a keen believer that when it came to having virtue, a person should hide their action and be virtuous in secret, which also deviates from the original views of arete (Dr. Godshalk’s Presentation on Jesus). Socrates idea of virtue did not agree with Jesus on this point, and tended to stay truer to the original view of arete that you should be noticed for your actions, regardless of what people thought about them (Dr. Godshalk’s Presentation on
Religion and profound quality, in his view, are so firmly related that neither one of the ones can exist separated from the other. Dissimilar to the Sophists, who were familiar with think about the requests of ethical quality as just the wants of the general population who planned them, Socrates has faith in a standard of profound quality that is something more than the human conclusion. He distinguishes it with
Since the first civilizations, cultures have valued certain virtues. The dictionary defines a virtue as “a good and moral quality. ”[explain it better] Virtues are vital to every culture. They determine how people conduct themselves, what religion they follow, and how they interact with the world around them.
(Modus Ponens) Socrates is like Jesus: both of them did not believe in gods of that time and both were just speaking to society, but in those speeches were hidden the great idea. Like Jesus, Socrates chose to die for his idea, not surrender norms of the society. Both men had their students, who recorded their words during their life or after death. (Analogy) Rejection of civic life in democratic
Virtue was viewed as one’s personal manners and beliefs,positive or negative, separate from any other’s
What is the measure of a good person? Is it his heroic ways, or perhaps his personality? A virtuous person can be defined in many ways. Characteristic such as being honest can up a person's reputation. Being respectable plays a big role
Socrates is quoted as stating, “An unexamined life is a life not worth living” (38 a). Socrates was a founding figure of western philosophy, and a stable for many ideas. He lived in Athens, Greece teaching his students, like Plato, questioning politics, ethical choices, and many other things in Greek society. In the Trial and death of Socrates: Four Dialogues by Plato, it explores the abstract questioning Socrates had towards many of the normal social properties, which led to his trial, resulting in his death. The most important aspects discussed in the dialogues is the questioning of what is pious and impious, what it means to be wise, and good life.
Where Pericles said that money did not matter, but did not really mean it; Socrates said money did not really matter and means it. “A citizen of the great and mighty and wise city of Athens, -- are you not ashamed of heaping up the greatest amount of money and honor and reputation, and caring so little about wisdom and truth and the greatest improvement of the soul” (Plato, 66)? Socrates said, “Not to take thought for your persons or your properties, but first and chiefly to care about the greatest improvement of the soul. I tell you that virtue is not given by money, but that from virtue comes money, and every other good of man, public as well as private” (Plato, 66). Socrates believes that Athenian citizens are more concerned with their wealth, but they should not be.
Here is my first piece of evidence to support my point. “I happen to be a gift of the god to the city; and this is how you can tell: Unlike most people, I have neglected all my own interests, and I’ve put up with this private neglect for so many years, while always attending to your business.” (Lines 108-111) In the quote stated above, Socrates claims that even with the annoyance people found in him, he pursued in his mission to help the people. Even though he had to give up his interests and hobbies, he did not give up his mission and focused on his work with the people all those years.
How Socrates (2000) mention above that wealth does not create a wise person, but a wisdom creates the good deeds for people. (p.10). Consequently, his meaning about excellence and wealth is correct because excellence is wisdom, justice, and virtue and these things can not be bought for money. Firstly, one of the different types of excellence is a wisdom.
Additionally, he pulls his reasoning from Greek mythology, which Socrates especially doesn’t necessarily hold as truth. So, Socrates asks again, not for an example of piety, but rather for the form or nature of piety
Philosophical thinking uses three acts of the mind: understanding, judgement, and reason. In order to have a sound argument all of the concepts must be applied. Socrates didn’t want to please the people by saying or doing what they wanted him to say or do. Socrates thought it was not important to seek wealth or fame; he was concerned with truth and virtue. He wanted to create an impact on humanity by relying on the truth and shining a light in people’s lives, even if they put him on trial.
However it is the underlying foundation of Jesus’s Humility, His Graciousness and His Courage. God would not request us as imperfect beings to walk in something He has not continually demonstrated how to
He understands that being his best isn’t as bad as they put it. Being the best is sinful and not respected in his society. Being one person, an individual is not respected. Being you and being better than anyone else isn’t respected. Everyone is equal and that is one thing that he did not praise.
In a professional and educational setup it can be translated as excellence. For instance a good manager has a virtue of excellence if he or she is good at handling his employees and other duties of the organization. This again is related to what Ciulla (2003) has said with regard to virtue. Moral value, on the other hand, is just a commitment to perform well in any undertaking. A manager will therefore be motivated to do good based on there virtues and moral obligations.