Grievance as conflict drivers Theories of Grievance: The following section looks into the evidence of grievance and social inequality as the source of violent conflict. In contrast to the theory of greed proposed by Collier and Hoefller (2004), many argue that the theory of grievance allows for the better explanation of the occurrence of the violent conflict. Central to grievance is identity and group formation (Murshed and Tadjoeddin, 2009). Theories of grievance can be divided into (i) relative deprivation, (ii) polarization and (iii) horizontal inequality (Murshed and Tadjoeddin, 2009). (i) Relative deprivation: As defined by Ted Gurr (1970), relative deprivation “is he discrepancy between what people think they deserve, and what …show more content…
Horizontal inequality can arise between groups clustered by ethnicity, religion, linguistic, history, culture and tribal affiliations. Four primary sources of horizontal inequality and examples regarding violent conflict that has arisen due to them are highlighted below: Primary sources of horizontal inequality Violent conflict example Discrimination in public spending Discrimination in public spending on education and healthcare leading to lack of development in rural and already disadvantaged areas of Burindi, Nepal have been the source of civil war in the country (Murshed and Gates, Murshed and Tadjoeddin, 2009). Asset inequality Asset inequality in agrarian countries as El Salvador, Guatemala, Phillippines and Zimbabwe have shown civil unrest and civil wars (Russett, 1964). Economic mismanagement and recession Following prolonged economic downturn and absence of economic growth many African, Latin American and FSU countries have suffered internal …show more content…
Vertical grievance can be viewed in terms of generally poor economic position of the population, high corruption and perception of weak political influence . On the other hand, horizontal grievance exists between different regions of Ukraine and between citizens with different social identities. As many terms used in the dissertation, the term identity has to be defined. Identify implies a sense of belonging to a certain group, a unity with its members. It can be argued that in addition to the national identity, in the case of Ukraine, one should look at the language-influenced identity that creates the sense of belonging and closeness with other language carriers and is shares between its members regardless of their citizenship and country of origin (Laitin, 1995; Laitin, 1998). It may also be interesting to further test this theory in more detail by looking at the national identity, voting patterns and political views in other FSU countries with high Russian speaking population levels i.e. Belarus, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, etc (Cheskin,
Banks Failed (Over 9,000 in the US and over 100,000 around the world) 3. There was a reduction in purchases and investments board which led to reduction in production and loss of jobs 4. American Economic Policy (Smoot-Haley Tariff set up for imports which resulted in less trade as countries retaliated) 5. Drought Conditions
Aaron Beck’s Prisoners of Hate (1999) provides a great in depth look at the causes of anger, hostility, and violence. Becks central message, that is illustrated throughout various chapters, is that all hate is hate, no matter the scale. In other words, the same mechanisms that cause people to hate their spouse is the same hate that is used to justify war. This fact is hardly intuitive, but Beck’s use of a broad variety of stories, backed up by cognitive analyses, shows just how similar all anger, hate, and hostility truly are. With that being said, Beck does not leave it at that, but rather provides numerous ways of correcting hate and freeing those who are prisoners of their own negative cognitions and emotions.
The unpopularity of the government’s actions, social unrest marked by movements and protests, and the poor management of the economic side of the
“You learn something new everyday” is a saying that is tossed around often times sarcastically, but when deeply explored it really is a true statement. A large amount of people in the United Sates would agree that there are certain aspects of the lives of indigenous peoples such as the Mayans, Aztecs, an Incas that our society can learn from daily. Aspects such as: creating a legacy to leave behind, learning to face injustice, but most importantly practicing civic engagement when possible. The aspects listed above would be tremendously helpful especially in a world where injustice still exists and a divide is on the rise. If people from thousands of years ago could grasp the three concepts of creating a legacy, facing injustices, and practicing
Wealth, race, gender, and mental illness has torn society apart and lead to inequality. These major reasons for inequality has affected everyone in its path leading to major consequences as well as issues and problems. In China, a new found wealth has left the social classes more divided and issues are beginning to rise. Meanwhile in the U.S., wealth is destroying students and unequal views toward specific types of people are weakening the patriotic bond. To begin, there are many types and factors that play a part in inequality and the consequences of societies from it, but one of the main reasons and apparent factors is wealth.
While Raz’s argument is valid, the practical application of deprivation is premature. The generalization of deprivation has caused more social issues and long-term negative effects such as sexism and racism. Raz begins by focusing on maternal deprivation. In 1950, British psychoanalyst, John Bowlby “argued,
"Tapping the Roots of Power" and "An Active Technique of Struggle" are two chapters where Gene Sharp, analyzes how power is continuously interchangeable amongst the oppressed which are usually minorities and their oppressors which usually are symbolized by people of power. In both chapters, Sharp in great detail gives the reader many scenarios in which oppressed groups through civil disobedience fight against their oppressors, usually leading to victory which resembles freedom and liberation. Although oppressed groups have a great deal to loose, their constant struggling motivates them to fight against the oppressor and regain their liberty and rights back. Once minorities start to challenge authority, their obedience is lost. Once this happens,
The differences of each economic class show the boundaries of how far people sympathise with those with nothing. When families fail to keep their land in economic
As humans, we should all be able to obtain these basic needs yet in society today, it is seen as a privilege. In the beginning, I mentioned that those living in poverty sometimes believe that they are in middle class. This is because our society has created discourses that allow families to believe that as long as they have a roof, they are living in middle class. This belief greatly disregard debts and other barriers that
The conflict standpoint is based on the idea that the society is comprised of various different groups who are in constant friction with one another for the access of scarce and valuable resources; these may include wealth, fame, power, or the authority to apply one’s own value system onto the general society. The conflict theorists argue that a conflict exists in the society when a group of people who believe that their interests are not being met, or that they are not getting a fair share of the society’s resources, work to counter what they perceive as a handicap or a
Overall, I believe that this assignment is informative. This assignment enhances my understanding of Social Psychology by having me identify the psychological principles behind an historic event of extreme act of violence wherein dislike for others played an imminent role and the event had large and widespread implications. It helps me to learn how to apply psychological principles in current and historic events such genocides and
Social inequalities can be described as the differences in “income, resources, power and status” (Naidoo and Wills 2008, in Warwick-Booth 2013, 2) that advantage a social class, a group or an individual over another, and thereby establish social hierarchies. It also affects inequalities in regards to gender, race, access to health and education, and general living conditions. In sociology, the dichotomy between the conflict theory approach and the functionalist approach has led to a discordant opinion in regards to social inequalities. The conflict theory seems to admit that social inequalities needs to disappear in order to install a common and equal base for all individuals, whereas the functionalist approach believes that social inequalities
Those in the authority position of society have control over the limited resources for which everyone is in competition. As a result, these power struggles allow for the social order to be governed by the powerful, rather than the consensus. Moreover, the powerful maintain their dominant positon and safeguard their privilege with their abundant resources. Conflict theorists, therefore, believe that theft is due to economic equality and would justify theft since the underprivileged need the limited resources monopolized by the wealthy in order to survive. Additionally, the laws that dictate punishment are created by those in power positions.
This essay will give a clear overview of the concept and theories of structural violence and how the idea can be used to encourage more attention on the fundamental cause of poverty and disease. It will as well look at how structural violence has an impact on illness and health. Furthermore, how clinician can lessen the effect of structural violence. The term violence conveys an image of physical or emotional assault on a person.
The violent conflict approach is defined through coercion, threats, and destructive assaults. Galtung’s, model suggests that each of these components influence one another, and while each