The researchers developed a systematic program of research, building on their own earlier findings making it more likely to make an important contribution (Polit & Beck, 2017). The authors paraphrased often, therefore not over relying on direct quotes from their original sources. •Does the review support the need for the study? The research review supported the study and strengthened the hypotheses. The data and additional quantitative and qualitative research articles supported the missed care results, limited bias, and predicted an existence of a relationship between the identified variables.
It is worth mentioning that grounded theory emerges from the viewpoint of participants (Henderson, 1998). That’s why, in support of this notion, grounded theory is developed from data analysis rather than one hypothesized a priori and tested afterwards (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). Also, grounded theory might be the most appropriate choice for research when a phenomenon has not been adequately described. Consequently, it is broadly used in human and health sciences, as the nature of these are not easily measurable and countable (Skeat & Perry, 2007). Additionally, it is developed from personal
We have chosen to focus on the case study method because of its popularity among the disciplines that traditionally informed context-oriented research in translation studies (cultural studies, sociology, political science, anthropology, psychology), as well as because of its flexibility in terms of drawing on a wide range of sources of data. The discussion of complexity thinking and case study in this paper will focus on causality, boundary setting and researcher
2006). Ragin et al., (2004), further add that it is both interpretive and subjective and enables the researcher to study a social phenomenon. The qualitative research approach was helpful in this study because we are aware of the fact that people can perceive or view the same phenomenon, improving alignment, in different ways. Data was collected specifically from top information systems managers of business organizations of various sizes and types. The participants were chosen carefully to provide the best results for the research.
The questions I had in mind I did not delve into as much as I should have and this would have made my work a lot better. I did not focus on the technical aspects of my research either. The presentation looks at research philosophy (positivism, systems thinking and phenomenology), research approach (abductive, inductive or deductive), research methodology (explanatory research, action research, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, content analysis and experiment), time-horizons ( cross sectional or longitudinal) and data collection methods (interviews or focus
Flyvbjerg (2006) for instance argue that it is misleading to conclude that one cannot generalise from a single case, but that it depends on the type of case one is considering and how it is chosen. He postulated that the strategic choice of a case can contribute to its generalisability. Yin (2009) on the contrary argue that case studies are generalizable to theoretical propositions (analytic generalisations) and not to populations or universes (statistical genearalisation) and that “in analytical generalisation, the investigator is striving to generalise a particular set of results to some broader theory” p.43). A third group of the proponents of the
The researchers use Strauss and Corbin (1998) to guide the use grounded theory in the study, and Miles and Huberman (as cited in Marshall &Rossman, 2006) to engage in purposeful sampling. The combination of these resources delivers an adequate description of the data collection methods, especially the coding strategies to develop categories. Addressing the impact of external influences continues the pattern of alignment with the grounded theory approach. Bias and dual relationships are addressed in the article, as the participants were students of the researchers. Haverkamp (2005), warns researchers to minimize the risk of dual relationships by anticipating the risk prior to data collection.
And thus, they weren’t able to fully understand what they were learning. Analysis and Insights The way the researchers conducted their study was organized. They used descriptive approach and employed survey questionnaires as the primary source of their data. They utilized random sampling in choosing which respondents would be utilized which was a fair way of obtaining data since every respondent were given equal opportunities to be selected. Their data gathering and interpretation was simple but concise.
1.0 CHAPTER OVERVIEW This chapter provides an introduction to the study work presented in this report. It provides an overview of the approach use by the researcher besides introduces the structure of the report. A part from that, this chapter also focus on background of the study and come out with problem statement, research question, research objective, significant of study and also definition of the term use in this research. 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY “Some people retire to satisfying lives, others to unhappy, I even miserable ones. In most cases, the cause for these differences lies, said that it not in our wallets but in ourselves.” , (Retirement Readiness Report, 2009).