“Guarding the Golden Door: American Immigration Policy and Immigrants Since 1882,” by Roger Daniels analyzes the United States’ immigration policy as one that has forever been flawed. Roger Daniels puts forward a clear yet through criticism of how racism, blind politics, and ignorance have all overtaken the immigration legislation since the past 140 years. Specifically, he claims, immigration laws have had an evocative effect on the immigrants during all eras and the issue has been magnified by the foreign threat nativist believe outsiders are bringing in. The prevailing belief during periods of restricted immigration to the United States was that alien groups, due to their innate inferiority, are not capable of absorbing the United States’ values and ideologies, and are a threat to the political institutions. Moreover, an increased flow of immigrants will trigger a loss of jobs that are rightfully for native citizens, will bring lower living standards, and overall annihilation of American values. This is seen with the rise of various factions such as the Know-Nothing Party and the Immigration Restriction League.
This book helps to interpret the ongoing debate on our nation's immigration policy, especially on the transformations after the September 11th attacks. This book, crafted by Daniels’s persuasive writing
…show more content…
With his academic prowess, Daniels is able to create a professional piece of literature book that has it all: solid, well-developed research and clear, cogent writing. His conclusions underline the absurdity that has plagued America’s immigration policies. Specifically, in his book, Daniels uses logos (logical and evidence-based reasoning) to assert his criticisms of the immigration legislation enacted since the past 140 years. This allows for an effective and thorough delivery of his commentary, which makes it easier for the reader to identify Daniels’
Historically, immigration has been a prevalent concern in the United States, impacting the stratification and disparities we see within our social institutions today. Despite our nation’s legacy of immigration, contemporary immigration and its policy reveal the barriers and challenges that have been placed by existing inequalities in America, inevitably shaping a culture of exclusion and assimilation. One way to illustrate is to consider the documentary film 9500 Liberty shot in Prince William County, Virginia during a large population growth in 2007. The documentary exposes racial tensions as Prince William County implements an illegal immigration enforcement policy which required police officers to inquire about the citizenship or immigration
The book “Harvest of Empire” (chap. 11 ) States that “Immigration policy has provoked fierce public debate in the United States for more than twenty years.” However, when this theme is touched, so many mixed emotions are heard, felt, even seen, and this is because this issue deals with everything from consideration for another human being to the country’s safety.
In his opinionated news article, “Ignorant Immigration Reform”, author David J. Bier asserts his opinion on a bill that will reduce the legal immigration by 50% in the United States. Bier supports his position by discussing how the bill won’t reduce immigration, stop the way immigrants are affecting the Americans wages and how they’re following Canada’s footsteps by concentrating on the skilled immigrants. Bier’s purpose is to notify the government of basic facts that they should know before making such claims, in order to bring into light what the real issue is. He writes in a very direct and sincere tone for the government and general public to inform them on false information that the government is claiming that the bill will do. Bier makes it very clear on where he stands on this issue by using credible facts, briefly explaining the opposing side's viewpoint, but he also shows that he’s very bias.
Humans rarely change their ways; they stay in their own worlds and always interact with the same types of people. Unfortunately, this habit often creates unseen barriers that divide and alienate human beings from one another. In Luis Alberto Urrea’s book The Devil’s Highway, Urrea provides a personal perspective to immigration by telling the story of 26 illegal immigrants, known as the Wellton 26, who are abandoned as they cross the Mexico-U.S. border. Through their story, Urrea proves there are invisible borders among people that create prejudice, such as language, ethnicity, and economic status. By reading The Devil’s Highway, it is clear that these barriers must be broken down to ensure harmony within society.
1). “New immigrants” were ridiculed and criticized by native-born Americans, as they believed that newly arrived immigrants were making little to no attempts to fit into American society. Fuel would only be added to the fire as many immigrants at the time were not willing to become citizens of the United States, with a study showing that “28 percent of Poles and Italians and 16 percent of Greeks and Portuguese [having] obtained American citizenship.” (Barkan, par. 5). This hesitation in becoming a citizen may have been brought on by the prejudice and hostility that immigrants had to deal with.
“I grew more aware of anti-immigrant sentiments and stereotypes: they don't want to assimilate, they are a drain on society,” says immigration rights activist Jose Vargas in his personal essay “My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant” [1080]. Immigration in the United States has been a wedge issue for American citizens and legislatures for decades. Jose Vargas, an illegal immigrant and prominent writer, producer, and activist speaks on his personal experience as an undocumented immigrant. He bravely admits the illegality of his presence in the United States and speaks out against discrimination as his life is a controversial subject in his own country. He speaks on this topic in a dignified manner in order to bring to light the hardships that
Describe the “New Immigration”, and explain how it differed from the “Old Immigration” and why it aroused opposition from many Native-Born Americans. Antiforeignism was not a new concept in America in the 1880s. It had begun in the 1840s when the first large influx of immigrants emigrated to America, predominantly from Ireland and Germany. The American, or “Know Nothing”, political party was created specifically for the sake of excluding and barring the newcomers from equal opportunities, especially with the case of the Irish in the northeast. Fast forward forty years later and the Irish and the German have become common place amongst the native born Americans and the new wave of immigrants emerges.
Immigrants have been looked at as a nuisance and a hindrance to the overall success of populations. Cornejo Villavicencio expresses the feelings of being an immigrant when she writes “There’s a pain to being an undocumented person in American that is constant and dull, like a headache.” This pain that she is referring to, stems from the origins of immigrants always feeling stressed and strained into an identity different from who they really are. Not speaking in their native tongue, living in the shadows, and shying away from higher levels of education, “being undocumented means living in a state of constant fear, always on the brink of discovery and deportation.” Cornejo Villavicencio really brings the attention onto the obvious mistreatment forced on the lives of immigrants, opposing what the majority of politicians and governments
Annotated Bibliography Beadle, Amanda Peterson. " Top 10 Reasons Why The U.S. Needs Comprehensive Immigration Reform." ThinkProgress. © 2016 - Center for American Progress, 10 Dec. 2012.
Immigration in the United States has ignited debate for as long as it has existed. The RAISE Act is the product of a history that put a greater value on highly skilled immigrants who benefit American economy than traditional American ideals of acceptance and hospitality. Whether prioritizing economic gain or cultural development, the RAISE Act demonstrates how opposing sides develop arguments founded solely on what they deem deserving of primacy. The United States boasts of being a tolerant magnet for immigration; however, immigration in the United States has a history of being controlled by those in power to limit and prioritize who has the right of becoming a citizen.
Immigration is deeply rooted in the American culture, yet it is still an issue that has the country divided. Marcelo and Carola Suarez-Orozco, in their essay, “How Immigrants Became ‘Other’” explore the topic of immigration. They argue that Americans view many immigrants as criminals entering America with the hopes of stealing jobs and taking over, but that this viewpoint is not true. They claim that immigrants give up a lot to even have a chance to come into America and will take whatever they can get when they come. The Suarez-Orozco’s support their argument using authority figures to gain credibility as well as exemplification through immigrant stories.
Many scholars have broadly revealed the guises under which U.S. immigration policies have racialized and criminalized immigrants from Mexico and other Latin American countries by engaging them as low-cost employment without offering paths for citizenship (Chock 1996). Immigration Policy does not want the ‘illegals’ to be anything but. Because it benefits the system to have them. Yet here we have all of these nominees trying to stop the ‘immigration problems’, and as Lakoff’s framing article explains. One cannot understand the issue as a cheap labor issue when it is framed as an ‘immigration problem’; concurrently a solution to the ‘problem’ will never address cheap labor since it is not within the immigration framework (Lakoff 2009).
All authors have different intentions with what they write, even if two authors have the same subject. Since immigration is such a large topic with many different views, it’s important to read different texts with a different point of views to get the full side of the
“The American story is a story of immigration. I would be the last person who would say immigrants are not important to America.” — Phil Graham, circa 1960. This quote may be from the mid-20th century, but it keeps its significance with the everlasting controversy on immigration and immigration laws. However, this is not the only time that the United States has experienced immigration controversies.
Introduction Informative, contemplative, and different are three words to describe “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” by Marcelo M. Suárez-Orozco and Carola Suárez-Orozco from Rereading America. “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” talks about unauthorized immigration. More specifically, this source talks about the other side of the issue of unauthorized immigrants; the human face of it all. “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” depicts the monster from one of Jeffrey Jerome Cohen’s thesis in the article, “Monster Culture (7 Theses).” The monster seen in the source “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” is the one that Cohen talks about in his fourth thesis, “The Monster Dwells at the Gates of Difference.”