ipl-logo

Gun Control: A Controversial Issue

536 Words3 Pages

Gun Control
Gun control is a very controversial issue. There are always two sides to every issue. For every person that agrees with the right to carry a firearm, there is one that disagrees. The second amendment protects the right to own a gun. Many groups feel the amendment should be rewritten. That it was written for a different place in history. Anti-gun groups feel guns are too easy to purchase. And requirements are not strict enough for ownership. They believe guns should be outlawed except for law enforcement. These groups classify all guns in the same category. There is a difference in guns and what function they were built for.
One of the argument anti-gun group’s use is the second amendment is in-valid. These groups argue the constitution needs to be rewritten. This argument has …show more content…

Along with stricter gun regulations, assault weapons have been outlawed. Any weapon that has the capacity to be used in the military is illegal:or has a military capacity. The government realizes that assault weapons are not for safety. Assault weapons cannot be used to hunt. Anyone that owns an assault weapon is not intending to use it for any purpose that is legal. They are semi-automatic and full automatic pistols and rifles. They are capable of shooting multiple rounds of ammunition. The majority of responsible gun owners do not believe assault weapons should be legal.
The people that oppose guns do not understand the facts. Gun control laws are very strict. There are only certain guns that are legal. The places that are generally under attack are gun free zones. The criminals and psychos know where they can do the most harm. People that intend to commit crimes with firearms will commit them. If not with firearms they will find something else. Gun control will never be enough for anti-gun groups. The abolishment of guns will never happen. There is no middle ground for either opinion. This issue will loom

Show More
Related

  • Arguments Against The Second Amendment

    95 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms. When the Second Amendment was written it was for the right to arm oneself as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, gun advocates proclaim that guns are for the right to self-defense. Some people try to participate and uphold the law. We have seen how guns in the hands of children can cause fatal accidents and people have committed mindless crimes leading to

    Read More

  • Why Is Bang For The Buck Important In History

    1188 Words  | 5 Pages

    The major problem is that the political class got it all wrong when it decided to allow citizens to own guns and made it became more of a love affair. Apparently, people had held different types of rifles during the militia wars that took place a long time ago in the United States history. One most critical recognizance of the history of the guns can be seen by looking at Britain's Militia Acts that took place in 1661 and 1662. The amendment gave an opportunity for the American citizens for rival groups to fire salvos at each other, and it largely played a part in the enhancement of gun violence that is still in play in the country. It is evident that the history of guns can be traced back to the colonial times.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution's Second Amendment

    804 Words  | 4 Pages

    In contrast, others believe it only protects the right to bear arms about a well-regulated militia. Nevertheless, the explanation is clear

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On 13th Amendment

    1485 Words  | 6 Pages

    Some individuals contend that the Second Amendment's text is out-of-date, unclear, and does not necessarily represent the amendment's primary intent or goals. Others believe that the Second Amendment has indeed been misunderstood and that it doesn't give an unrestricted ability to own and carry any kind of firearm. They think the amendment should be modified in order to make it more clear what it means and communicate more effectively. With the amount of shooting rampages in our nation, these forces have turned into an even more urgent issue that requires direct action. There are critics on both sides of this matter, yet, guns should be allowed to remain owned and controlled by any competent but should have more laws to

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Gun Control And Firearm Regulation

    1549 Words  | 7 Pages

    Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.

    Read More

  • How Does Gun Control Affect Society

    1002 Words  | 5 Pages

    Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. Many citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would reduce the threat of crime. People have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting and recreational activity. With the recent events involving firearms and mass shootings, people are skeptical whether to increase or decrease gun laws. Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.

    Read More

  • The 2nd Amendment Rights

    1991 Words  | 8 Pages

    A loose interpretation of the 2nd Amendment looks mostly at the “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”part of the 2nd Amendment, this is usually seen from a pro-gun rights supporter as an all inclusive clause which covers an individual 's right to bear arms. In contrary to gun control supporters, they see the framers setting up the 2nd Amendment as a right for individuals to bear all arms, not only for militia use,but for personal use such as hunting or sport. And any regulation that will infringe upon someone bearing arms is a violation of what the constitution guarantees for them. Having guns is right they believe to have and the way they are used can be

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Right To Bear Arms

    1297 Words  | 6 Pages

    In contrast, Opponents believe that arms should have regulations because they cause violence, such as mass shootings and murder. Despite the differences on each side, the second amendment aids in the protection of all individual rights of the people to keep and bear arms for self-defense when necessary. As a result, the definition of the right to bear arms has to be provided. The second amendment is quite a chicanery clause to understand, the first part of the clause states “ a well-regulated militia.” “Well regulated…” was defined in the eighteenth century, as properly but not overly regulated (Roleff 69).

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Banning Assault Rifles

    587 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some authors feel a sense of pride in having guns a part of our country. “Without guns we would not be the free country we are today.” (Juliano 21). Not only do citizens

    Read More

  • Ethical Arguments Against Gun Control

    1264 Words  | 6 Pages

    Gun control is a topic that has been debated over the last few years. It is a subject that many people stand for and against the change in policy. Basically gun control would change the way firearms are regulated, by changing laws or polices that control how they are made, sold, owned, and used by civilians. However by trying to take away firearms from civilians would be infringing upon their rights as United States citizens. There are many ethical reasons why gun control should not be implemented towards law-abiding citizens such as it is hypocritical, neglects the reality of control, and is discriminating against gun owners.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay Against Gun Control

    1108 Words  | 5 Pages

    Guns need to be strictly controlled to fulfill the promise that was made to all of us, protection under all

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Proposed Solutions For Gun Control

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

    Read More

  • Why Guns Should Not Be Banned Essay

    1700 Words  | 7 Pages

    In past circumstances when guns were banned, criminals were the kind of people that the government wanted to make sure did not have guns. In reality, they were always the ones who still had the guns (Lott). People can say that gun crime is a serious firearm problem, but guns are not always the exact cause of the crime. Even if the government tries to deny groups access to guns, they could still find their way around the law and gain access to one

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Why Guns Are Bad

    1432 Words  | 6 Pages

    Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

    Read More

  • Gun Laws Argument Essay

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, the people for Gun Control are infringing rules that are immovable, and the against it are literally on higher ground because they know that the people for it are trying to fight America, which they are. Gun Control is just one big fight that was started by people that lust for control and use it to pollute the society. Even though gun laws are the top answer for less gun

    Read More

More about Gun Control: A Controversial Issue

Open Document