Gun Control Book Review

702 Words3 Pages
Gun Control Gun Control has been a long debated issue in America. Two authors with unique views were selected as experts on the topic. The War on Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies by John R. Lott Jr. & Living with Guns: A Liberal 's Case for the Second Amendment by Craig R. Whitney. According to author John Lott, “The War on Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies,” methodically dismantles one modern gun-control myth after another. Moreover, Lott has set the record straight in such a systematic style. He answers the unsupported rhetoric and exaggeration of gun-control advocates with facts and statistics. His book provides an abundance of tables and graphs. Lott makes his point in a way that is easy to comprehend. He gives…show more content…
It analyzes the upshot of previous gun control laws and reflects why firearms can be equally effective and ineffective. This book delivers many statistics, making it incredibly fascinating for many individuals who can relate to the various diverse opinions regarding gun control. Likewise, it divulges a long history of gun control in America, extending back to the first English conquerors of the New World. Once more, Living with Guns presented a reasonable deportment on gun control and evaluated the pros and cons of employing gun control laws mutually. Together these two authors shared a resemblance in captivating the identical manner regarding gun control. Reading both books regardless of one’s understanding of gun control will deliver a satisfactory perception on the topic. Whitney enlightens on the commencement of gun laws in America. It is moderately thought-provoking how he views the second amendment’s creation and the manner in which it affected individuals in the United States. Whereas, Lott does not explain far in-depth in regards to the second amendment. He primarily focuses on the script of discrediting the entire mythologies surrounding gun control. In Living With Guns, Whitney offers perception on both the historical background of the proprietorship of firearms in the United States (and pre-revolutionary colonial America) and the modern state of affairs based on the Supreme Court decisions in Heller and McDonald cases in 2008 and 2010 (72). He appears to triumph on being critical of both federal fiascos and the National Rifle Association (NRA). In summary, readers may perhaps find this suitable, as he periodically reflects on the conception that much control ought to be managed at the local
Open Document