What is gun control? Gun control is the description that protesters and socialist groups have put on the topic of making laws about guns. Some people want to ban guns, so they are illegal and not the problem. Others want to put limits on what type of guns the people can buy. Then there are the people that want to put a restriction on the amount of some guns sold.
On the other hand, we have does that believe that more controls laws should be implemented since the 2nd amendment was for the right of States to have an armed militia during wartime. Both sides have strong point, however, the safety of our children comes first, and a firearm means death in the wrong hands. If we look back at the history of gun control in the United States, we can determine that gun control laws are
This is a persuasive essay on the subject of gun control and whether citizens should be able to carry guns in public. It is discussed that guns should be permitted because previous incidents where people did not have protection against other members of society led to numerous fatalities. Guns would benefit society on the basis of self defense. It is also discussed of the ways to help regulate gun control such as background checks and other actions that could be taken. The cost of gun violence is soaring and a way to monitor that is to adapt better gun laws for citizens Law enforcement is there to protect us but sometimes things need to be handled instantly and having to wait on them can present a bigger problem.
As a nation, we need to unite as a whole with some common sense and help implement laws to lower gun violence. There are many reasons why the government needs to change existing laws. For instance, it is unhealthy for young children and teens to have access to these guns within arms reach. Furthermore, background checks will have a huge part in this process of reducing gun violence. Such as, reducing the amount of people who have access to guns who shouldn’t.
Some believe that this is a terrible amendment to have our country live by, this group supports enforcing gun laws or even abolishing guns all together. This is not the only side of the argument though, there are opposers to enforcing gun laws that believe that there are already enough laws for buying guns and what you can do with them. The opposers also believe that we should focus more of our efforts on the mental health of the people instead of the guns they use. The debate on gun control is a very pressing matter. Some believe that the laws on gun control should be stricter, while others believe the laws should be looser for self-defense and hunting.
Gun laws in the United States should be more contained. To accomplish results, our country needs to reconsider and change how we regulate firearms in the hands of the population. As of now anyone can buy and own a gun at the minimum age of 18 or 21, depending on the type. There is a required background check when buying a gun (legally) but it is not in depth enough to raise suspicion of possible psychological factors that could cause the weapon to be used for a wrong purpose. A test, similar
It all in would cause more damage than letting people own firearms. Banning the use of firearms would only cause more destruction,more havoc, and make guns distributed illegally isn’t that against the point? The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, this was made after the American Revolution as a right that could not be taken away. The right to bear arms comes from the fact that all men and women should be able to defend themselves from threats. Some people do think guns are unnecessary and that now we are more civilized than before and that guns just cause destruction while
According to the Pew Institute for Research 52% of Americans believe that gun laws should become stricter. There is public support for politicians to change gun laws, yet they still have done little to address it. The last major gun law change in the United States was in 2004 enacted by President Bush (Fisher 1). However, the change was not a creation of new regulations rather it was a cut to the Assault Weapon Ban Enacted by President Clinton (Fisher 1). According to Slate this caused a great spike in sales of weapons such as the AR-15 (Fisher 1).
Lastly, the last source that will be synthesize into essay is another article from the same database as the first source and second sources titled, "Is Gun Control the Answer to Mass Shootings?" By Charles Scaliger which is against gun control. By looking at the tone of the article and Scaliger 's usage of words such as "anti," "criminalizing," "utopian," "sin," and "evil," one can argue that article is against gun control. These sources were chosen because they provide strong evidences that both support
“You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you do not enforce them, people are going to find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It 's not the law-abiding citizens. It 's not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). Gun control laws are made to keep people safe, but that does not necessarily mean that they are one-hundred percent effective.