The United Kingdom and Australia do not even fall onto this list, consequently, the countries mentioned to not be on the list have a form of strictly enforced, bans on guns. As stated earlier, between fifteen-thousand and seventeen-thousand people are killed in America annually. Evidence that gun control is effective in preventing murders, accidental deaths, and unneeded harm to any person can easily be seen in the statistics from countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, or even Canada, where of all the murders in the United States in twenty-twelve, sixty percent were by firearm compared with thirty-one percent in Canada, eighteen percent in Australia, and just ten percent in the UK. Again all of these countries have gun control and it clearly shows that the murder and death rates by guns has had a significant drop since the ban, as well as these countries murder rates as a whole. Now, the question may be asked or stated about the second amendment, in a ruling by the Supreme Court in twenty-o-eight, ruled that the second amendment, like every other constitutional amendment can be limited by the Government.
Australia banned firearms and had a gun guyback program in 1996 and introduced much stricter laws. These revisions included a 28 day waiting period and providing a genuine reason why you need to purchase a firearm. They have seen a massive decrase in gun violence. Total intentional firearm related deaths plunged 50% in the 10 years after the 1996 laws were introduced, even as Australia’s population grew almost 13%. The rate of gun suicides per 100,000 people dropped 65 percent from 1995 to 2006, and the rate of gun homicides fell 59 percent.
This law empowers any American citizen to possess a firearm thus, people who have psychological deficiencies can buy a gun as easy as you. This law does not only empower Americans as it causes the death of 30,000 people per year, and half of this substantial number
Gun control and the second amendment The second amendment has been apart of this country since the founding fathers but each year gun laws get stricter so my stance on the subject is that we should keep the laws the same.The main problem with these changes are the main options being flawed like the gun buyback.The fact that guns are not the main cause of homicide in the United States.And last that there are already organizations in place informing people the proper ways to legally get and own guns like the N.R.A .The main problems summarized are non effective resolutions,the fact that guns are not the leading cause of death in the US,and that there are already organizations in place making sure that the laws work. The first point I made was that that what the other sides solutions are flawed and don 't work.For example In Australia after the largest mass shooting in Australian history in 1996 they made laws banning semi-automatic and self-loading rifles.They also did a mandatory gun buyback where 700,000 guns were surrendered.Did this help the overall homicides lower no it only let it go higher in
The United States has more than 3 million population, accounting for about 6 percent of the world’s population. But the U.S. shooting rampage accounts for nearly 31 percent. Although many people try to carry out some policies about gun control, such as Obama and Clinton, but neither of them is successful. Many people may think why gun control is such a controversial issue in America. I think there is a wide array of obstacles and the NRA (National Rifle Association of America) plays a vital role in these obstacles.
It analyzes the upshot of previous gun control laws and reflects why firearms can be equally effective and ineffective. This book delivers many statistics, making it incredibly fascinating for many individuals who can relate to the various diverse opinions regarding gun control. Likewise, it divulges a long history of gun control in America, extending back to the first English conquerors of the New World. Once more, Living with Guns presented a reasonable deportment on gun control and evaluated the pros and cons of employing gun control laws mutually. Together these two authors shared a resemblance in captivating the identical manner regarding gun control.
The act makes the gun regulation much stricter by banning assault weapons including any semiautomatic weapon with detachable magazine and one military-style feature; limiting the magazine capacity from 10 rounds to seven; gun licenses needed to be renewed every five years; background check will be required to all gun sales, including private sales, with the exception between immediate family member; mentally incompetent are not allowed to purchase guns; and establish tougher penalties for the use of illegal gun. The
Recent studies found that the most effective way of reducing gun crime is to lower the amount of guns available in circulation. In the US specifically, studies show that the stricter gun laws are in a state, the lower the amount of deaths related to guns occur (Graham). While many believe that further restrictions on guns would not be feasible, both Australia and the United Kingdom managed to highly restrict or ban guns from their nations in order to reduce gun-related deaths and crime (Graham). Australia was able to rid the country of around 650,000 guns and their rate of robberies per 100,000 people sank from about 100 to 60 (cite later 1). This program of complete gun confiscation costed Australia $230 million.
Gun control brings about many issues of citizen rights and legalities. There are many benefits and disadvantages of gun control. Some proponents of gun control would argue things such as; the constitution says only militias should be allowed arms, and that it doesn 't allow unlimited ownership. Also, they might say the constitution is dated and did not intend to allow “assault” rifles. Some other arguments may include things such as: reduced violence with less weapons, guns
First, a specific example of Australia handling shootings in a sincere efficient way.Revering Australia, Kristof notes that Australia’s “homicide rate was almost halved” by the country enforcing “tougher firearm restrictions” (Kristof).Therefore America should mimic Australia’s example and introduce stern gun laws to protect U.S. citizens. Second, he appears to logos while illuminating the fact that America has more regulation on objects that contribute less to death of Americans than guns. Logically, he persuades that America “should address gun deaths as a public health crisis”
Implementing gun control policies in a nation with a large number of gun ownership is difficult because these policies are bound to be opposed by some citizens. Striking a balance between protecting the right of Americans to own guns and controlling gun ownership
There is only one place (Directorate of Arms and Munitions Sales) where the sale of firearms is legal in Mexico, yet it had 11,000 gun murders in 2012 compared to the US’ 9,000. Between 2005 and 2012, Mexico’s gun store sold 6,200 guns. However, 15,000,000 guns are owned by Mexicans, and one firearm is allowed per person. In the UK, citizens cannot carry handguns unless granted permission by the police as having a “good reason to”. Since this legislation 15 years ago, the homicide rate is up 14% (TheGuardian).
The topic of concealed carry is still controversial 200 years later. Guns rights activists would make steps against gun laws only to be swallowed up by the anti gun administration. The NRA is certainly not perfect and has had its own share of personal controversies. Despite few gun accidents and suicides gun control is a burden on society. A citizen
Within each of these issues there are those who want more gun control legislation and those who want less. Therefore, it could be said that it has come a time for change in our gun legislation to make obtaining a gun harder for criminals and the mentally ill. Whether it be through public or private parties. Although gun control in America might seem to be out of control, it 's a matter of gun ownership and gun rights that needs to be reformed into a better set of laws and limitations. Such laws and limitations that would better regulate who can buy or own a gun.