Despite the 90 percent of Americas in support of the bill, the Gun Show Background Check Act of 2013 failed to become a law--even after several rounds of amendments. Arriving in the wake of numerous mass shootings around the country, President Obama pushed for the Gun Show Background Check Act that would require all gun show operators to have registered with the Attorney General, have a specific photo ID, and to sign a ledger acknowledging that all requirements and protocols have been met. Additionally, it would require those wishing to purchase said firearms from gun shows to have a background check and have their weapons registered with the Attorney General in ten days’ time after the sale. The final vote in the Senate was 54 to 46 and …show more content…
However, the President has relatively few powers compared to Congress. In addition to signing bills into laws once they pass through Congress, the president may also veto a bill and leave it up to Congress to override or revise the bill. Furthermore, presidents can issue proclamations or executive orders (during emergencies), which completely bypass Congress and would require a bill to then override his executive order should they choose to do so. However, unless the bill passes through Congress, the President does not come in contact with it, and has to wait until it is passed through both the House of Representatives and the Senate for him/her to be able to sign it into a law or veto it. Presidents become the spokesperson for bills like the Gun Show Background Check Act and promote them with persuasive speeches and events, urging Americans to exert pressure on law makers. After the defeat of the gun control bill, President Obama somberly stated, “All in all, this is a pretty shameful day for Washington…The American people are trying to figure out—how can something that has a 90 percent support not happen?” (McAuliff) …show more content…
This is called the ad hoc rule, in which allows the end to a filibuster only if 60 senators vote in support of it. Filibusters are delays or efforts to “Hold the Senate floor in order to prevent action on a bill” ("Filibuster”). Even with several Republicans following the Democrats and supporting the bill, some Democrats opposed the bill due to being from pro-gun states. Interest groups are extremely vital to the legislative process and—in the case of this bill-- the complete lack of connection between the people and the senators. The NRA played a leading role in the defeat of the Gun Show Background Check Bill. Their sheer size alone, consisting of four million members and lobbyists, became a force to be reckoned with. Being that their members are highly passionate about their group, unfortunately it is often less threatening for a senator to side with the NRA than their views than risk their career. The NRA threatened that they would retaliate against supporters of the bill and “called the expanded background checks a first step toward a national gun registry and government confiscation of firearms” (Barrett, Cohen) (Sidlow, Henschen)
Logos are also developed by citing facts and statistics. Giffords explains, “These senators made their decision based on political fear and on cold calculations about the money of special interests like the National Rifle Association, which in the last election cycle spent around $25 million on contributions, lobbying and outside spending.” Senators gave into fear and failed to protect the citizens of American. Giffords stamped those who voted against the bill as cowards. She states the amount as a bold print to prove that she knows exactly how much was spent in the last election cycle.
“The lobbying arm of the NRA” was established as members believed that, in order to protect their right to bear arms, they had to directly impact decision-making in Washington (NRA-ILA n.d.). Due to the contemporary debate of whether the number of gun regulations should increase, the Institute has retained the media’s spotlight since 2008 because of their prominent public influence, especially during the former presidency of Barack
This bill would add more people to the criminal background check database, which would stop poeple on the list from buying a gun. It would also make it so every gun purchase would require a background check. This would close the gun show loophole, where you can buy a gun at a gun show without a background check, but need a background check to buy a gun at a store. Proponents want this to pass to keep criminals from getting guns more easily. It is too easy for a criminal to buy a gun at a gun show, at some criminals are not on the list of those with criminal backgrounds that should keep them from buying a gun at store.
A Democratic senator from Delaware wishes to introduce a piece of legislation that would ban the sale of all handguns. There are several obstacles that this bill will face throughout the whole process of getting the bill passed. Some of these obstacles include being from the state of Delaware, being a Democrat in a Republican majority congress, second Amendment rights, and gun lobbyists such as the National Rifle Association, or NRA. One of the obstacles this senator would face is the fact that he is from Delaware. Delaware is such a small state that not many people really care about.
The President can veto bills passed by Congress, but Congress can override their veto with a two-thirds majority in both chambers. The judiciary can declare the laws passed by Congress unconstitutional, and the President nominates federal judges, but the Senate confirms them. This creates a separation important to the security of a proper and equal democracy. In conclusion, the U.S. Congress and the President have distinct roles and responsibilities defined by the Constitution. Congress is responsible for making laws and the President executes and enforces them.
The article “The Dirty Secret About The Four Senate Gun Control Bills” by John R. Lott points out that all the gun control laws aren’t helping anything. John starts off by talking about the Orlando massacre, and how the government was trying to help prevent that. Then he goes on to talk about the senate gun control laws trying to be passed for the purpose of stopping shootings such as the Orlando Massacre. But the fact is that the gun control bills, if passed before the Orlando Massacre, would have done nothing to prevent it. The bills just didn’t do anything to help prevent the massacre.
Within American ideals, laws, and opinions concerning gun control, firearms continue to be a critical matter in the government, schools, and communities. Notably, the nation 's government has attempted, and or passed, laws that inhibit guns in some kind of way. Now, generally the issue of gun control is viewed differently by either political parties; liberal Democrats tend to sway towards the side that is in favor of gun control laws, while Conservative Republicans have opposing views about these ideas. Therefore, since our nation is executively governed by Barack Obama, a democrat, the concern around firearm laws have intensified over the past eight years he has been in office.
This blog, is based on Evan Defilippis overview on the pros and cons of gun control. Defilippis develops well written and clear visual arguments on both sides of the issue. For example, he states “The main point of this argument is that criminals do not follow laws; therefore laws restricting gun ownership and types of guns would only hurt those who follow them.” “Gun control laws only help criminals, criminals do not play by the law. That is why we need to punish criminals, not law-abiding citizens by disarming them.
The President and Congress work with each other to pass laws. While Congress is in charge of drafting and voting on bills the President is the one who signs the bill making it a law. The Executive and Legislative branch both have checks and balances over each other. But three important tools that the President uses when dealing with the legislative branch are vetoes, executive orders, and the President’s ability to persuade not only legislatures but also citizens. Vetoes, a formal tool, are used by the President to stop any legislation they don’t want passed.
The PBS program “Gunned Down: The power of the NRA” highlighted how the NRA continues it’s stranglehold on the government and gun policies. It is quite clear that gun control advocates attempt to play off the emotion of citizens whereas pro gun advocates fear the public into believing the government is attempting to steal their guns and liberties. The side of the gun control advocates can be seen through the likes of President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. Conversely, the pro gun effort is shown through Ringleader Wayne LaPierre who continues to save the NRA and second amendment rights. President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were both portrayed as compassionate, caring individuals that were fighting for a life or
Owning guns or banning them is a highly controversial topic in the United States today. Everytime, there is a mass shooting or violence commited the issue resurfaces. The real question is should the government make strict gun control laws and legislations? Would it help to decrease the crime rate or will it be the opposite effect? The nation is divided on this issue, some believe there should be bans on guns some think there shouldn't be any.
26 Oct. 2015. This article talks about the supporters and non-supporters of gun control and what all of it could lead too. It talks about our Second Amendment rights and how the Democrats as well as The Republicans wanted to make it harder for the mentally ill to get firearms in their hands. They would increase the funding for the prosecutions and they would even get more strict on the control of gun trafficking. This article also states that The Democrats were very quick to blame The Republicans for the broken gun laws.
In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.
Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.
The Constitution defines the president as the executive who puts into effect the laws Congress passes. The president is elected every four years, and can only be re-elected once. The president is both the head of state and head of government of the USA, and the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. The president is also responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. The president of the USA is by many considered the most powerful man in the world.