The most captivating aspect of any Western movie is a gun-slinging cowboy. They’re cool, skilled, and at some point in the film they usually take the law into their own hands, shooting up all the bad guys and getting the girl in the process. This however, raises a question. Are these men on the right side of the law? Yes, their actions are guided by their own sense of justice, but doesn’t bypassing the law make them no better than the criminals they are going after? No. Not always. In the movie Shane, Shane himself said that, “…there’s no living with a killing,” meaning that he himself knew that his actions weren’t right. The key factor in determining righteousness is the motive behind it. Shane acts out of a desire to protect the people he cares about, rather than revenge or greed. That is what makes his actions just. It is important when thinking about justice in the western film to consider the setting and context of what’s going on. In the era of the cowboy the law was something that was more …show more content…
He himself makes that clear when he said, “There’s no living with a killing. There’s no going back from it. Right or wrong, it’s a brand, a brand that sticks.” He acknowledges the fact that it is no small matter. Even if it is justifiable, it is still something that will follow a person for the rest of their lives. Shane did what he did so that nobody else would have to carry that burden. Joey wanted to be a gunfighter until Shane changed his mind. Joey saw a gun as something meant for taking out bad guys, but Shane saw it as nothing more than a tool. Shane changed the lives of many people throughout the film, and they were all better for it. There are few things more honorable and praised in this world than self-sacrifice: Hindering one’s self for the advancement of another. It is considered kind, just, and honorable. What Shane did is no different, and it further adds to the validation of his
He declares “I am the guilty cause. I did the deed,/ Thy murderer. Yea, I guilty plead./ My henchmen, lead me hence, away, away,/ A cipher, less than nothing; no delay!” () He feels extreme guilt for the deaths of his son, wife, and niece.
My issue with not allowing the murder to see judgement, is the fact that they have done many horrific things to those they have slaughtered. When someone is born into this world, they are given
Gunrunner Goes Hangman This is a the story of Riker Syke. One of the most famous gunrunners in the U.S. He had his own alliance full of lower-class gunrunners. You can imagine how rich he became. He was a very hostile man, never caught by the police, until one day.
Valance then leaves knowing that Tom is the only man who could ever actually beat him in a dual. This scene shows that Tom is willing to kill someone over a simple dirty look. In the end Tom does end up killing Liberty with no problem showing that he does go that far if needed to and in this case it was needed or Ranse would have died. Like Tom , Shane shows the same characteristics when it comes to guns and violence . At the beginning it doesn 't seem as if Shane is really interested In even holding a gun but after becoming fairly close with Joe and his family,Shane realizes that although he doesn 't want to , he must take action to keep Joe’s family safe.
Through the two stories, Coyote and the Buffalo by Christine Quintasket and Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards, we learn that Native Americans and Puritans believed that people were ultimately bad. In the beginning of Coyote and the Buffalo, Quintasket explains to the reader that “No buffalo ever lived in the Swah-netk’-qhu country. That was Coyote’s fault. If he had not been so foolish and greedy…”. In this myth, Native Americans teach an important lesson on how humans can be bad through coyotes actions.
However, he has made a decision to face any situation provided he avenges the death of his
“Our Blind Spot about Guns” Rhetorical Analysis Essay American Journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his essay, “Our Blind Spot about Guns”, addresses that if only guns were regulated and controlled like cars, there would be less fatalities. Kristof’s purpose is to emphasize how much safer cars are now than in the past, while guns do not have the same precautions. He constructs a compelling tone in order to convince the reader that the government should take more control on the safety of guns and who purchases them. Kristof builds credibility by successfully exerting emotional appeals on the audience, citing plausible statistics, and discussing what could possibly be done to prevent gun fatalities. Kristof begins his essay by discussing how automobile
In T. Coraghessan Boyle’s short story “The Hit Man”, underlying psychoanalytical themes are present that display an allusion to struggles in human life. The main themes present in this story are dysfunctional behavior, displacement, and an insecure sense of self. Readers see the main character, The Hit Man, go through his entire life struggling with insecurity and other dysfunctional behavior. During this timeline, his dysfunctional behavior represents common struggles and conflicts that occur in common day-to-day life. Relationships with his parents and classmates and also academic struggles seems to be the main contribution to the way this character is represented.
The noise became so loud and painful that he revealed that he murdered the man. While some may believe that the murderer is criminally insane, he clearly proves to be a merciless killer through
I agree with the decision of him being sentenced for life. He killed two innocent people and was making an attempt on a third person. I think a rightful punishment is life in
A Gay Modern Cowboy Meets Alien Tim Mcdowal was a modern gay cowboy in search of a new boyfriend. He had his heart broken by his ex and now he was being very careful. It was difficult for him to trust another man. However, he was feeling extremely lonely and horny. He decided to go at a bar and have a one night stand.
He was given more power than he wished for and if the final verdict on the man’s life was down to him, maybe he feels that it has changed him and that he regrets his
Even if murderers committed a crime, they are still human beings and they are innocent if proven guilty, so
Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).
Killing cannot be justified if it harms innocent people. Also, killing cannot be justified if it is to kill an abusive parent or spouse. This is because killing them doesn’t make the killer a better person. In fact, killing them makes the killer just as bad as them.