Furthermore, strict gun laws won 't reduce violence because “only 2.6 percent of all murders are committed with some type of rifle.” Said Annie from Gun Control: Five reasons why it wont work. More people die from knives and physical contact .“Use of knives, bats and blunt objects are the tools which the criminals use to take far more lives that guns.” said a source from Top10sTop. Also many People are more likely to feel safer in their homes if they have a gun around.
Gun control is a highly debated topic because hunters and recreational shooters carry and use guns for a living while others carry guns for malicious intent and a mind to kill. People argue about gun control because a lot of people do not misuse the weapons but all it takes is one well-coordinated
Meaning this law may restrict the health service from providing their treatment because people with mental problem can use the guns and kill the innocent people. This may be the reason why the law is against the treatment. From my opinion, these disadvantages are common sense. In one hand, people who are mentally sick are suppose to get treatment in order to reduce the amount of gun death. They use guns and shoot out of their sense and out of control.
People often wonder why guns are legal for citizens to own. Guns are put to blame for much of the crime that happens in the world but it is the people that do the crime not the guns. Gun control laws have been debated about and tried to be put in place for many years in the United States. There are laws restricting some types of weapons and where weapons can be used but some people want more laws controlling all guns and some wanting to ban all guns. Many people promoting gun laws are not educated on some of the statistics and ways that guns save and protect innocent people.
However, the effort by some misguided individuals to eliminate the legal ownership of guns does not address the real problems at hand and simply disarms the innocent law-abiding citizens who are most in need of a form of self-defense. Guns and violence is hurting our community, Many people are asking whether guns really are the helpful tool that many of us have been saying they are, or if they are the killing machines. If guns wasn 't so convenient to get to now days our crime rate would be low. Also people needs to come to their senses and wake and stop trying to kill pullets don 't have eyes. In the article I readed a the quote had said “ Evil should be known as evil.
Will taking away the guns of the public really affect homicide and public shootings? A study conducted by the University of Harvard Massachusetts concluded that violent crimes have fallen after states allowed for citizens to carry a concealed weapon. This study also shows results in homicide decreasing by 8.5 percent, rape falling by 5 percent and aggravated assault dropped by 7 percent. There is a reduction of gun related crime in states that allow citizens to possess concealed weapons. The truth is simple, guns are not always used as a means of offensive action, it is used by a majority as a means of self-defense.
Nobody likes dodging bullets because some crazy person is coming at them with a gun or walking around in fear. Remember this; America has the most gun-related deaths than any other industrialized nation and firearms are the 2nd most frequent cause of death. Many innocent human beings die from these guns and their irresponsible owners. I do agree with the people who say it is not the gun’s fault, but the person’s. But, because of those irresponsible gun owners, though, guns cannot be trusted in the hands of some adults.
The numbers might seem small, but imagine the of difference these made to the lives of the people. One thing that people against citizens wanting firearms are worried about is that gun-carrying individuals might be prone to commit crimes or use their weapon. Based on statistics, however, the general public is less likely to be arrested for carrying weapons without permits or non-violent offenses. This means most adults who carry concealed weapons are
Guns don 't kill people, people kill people. One of the biggest problems in the United States is that politicians blame guns for all the problems in the country so they want to ban them, but more gun laws and regulations will not help. Guns have existed since before the American Revolution they will not be going anywhere anytime soon. Though guns are used in many bad confrontations they are also used for good such a the military, hunting, the police force, and even in some countries guns are still used to execute the most dangerous people alive.
A poll was taken and found that “57%” of people voting “feel less safe… [knowing that] concealed guns may lawfully be carried” (ProCon.org 3). Having concealed guns does not make people feel safer; in fact, it makes people feel less secure. For example, an older man with a “legally concealed handgun” fatally shot another man over an argument about texting at a movie theater (ProCon.org). This homicide is just one example why concealed hand guns should be banned. If the man in the situation above had not had his handgun, there would have been no casualties, but because of the law stating that he can legally carry it around, someone had to die (ProCon.org).
As said by Kelly Sampson, on behalf of the Brady Campaign, allowing concealed carry would force the criminals to get higher damage guns, which would lead to an unnecessary amount of guns. If criminals got higher grade weapons, it would mean more violent crimes and more deaths. Obama once said “There is a gun for roughly every man, woman, and child in America. So how can you, with a straight face, make the argument that more guns will make us safer?” and many people on the pro-gun control side stand by this.
Gun control is an issue in many aspects; it is a rights issue regarding the second amendment, a safety issue, a political issue, and a racial issue. In 2017 alone, there have been 5,300 gun- related deaths in the US, not including an approximate 22,000 due to suicide. With a higher rate of public shootings and massacres occurring in recent years, this topic has been of high debate. By prohibiting the purchase of firearms by civilians, you violate the 2nd Amendment of the US constitution, protecting gun ownership. Additionally, criminals will be undeterred by gun control laws.
One example that can prove my proposal. If you give firearms to kids and adult they might start killing each other, but that’s not a big deal, I mean really think about it. If kids and adults start killing each other there would be less homeless people. If people die they would leave their house, so we can use them as housing so they would be less people wandering in the streets. 578,424 out 700,000 are homeless imagine how many people can have their own house.
“According to the NRA, guns are used for self-defense 25 million times a year. (procon.org) Stricter laws make it harder for people to protect their homes and families. Executive vice preisdent of the NRA, stated, “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a goof guy with a gun” (procon.org). There are many more reasons why there should be less gun control laws, these are only a few. Americans deserve their gun rights.
Then we hear the counter argument “People with guns kill people”. David Kyle Johnson Ph.D. made a good point; what if you place in another word for guns such as cars or bazookas (Guns Don’t Kill People, People Do?). Does the line the NRA uses as its slogan effectively convince people that it’s the one and only truth? Johnson also says the question is inconclusive. When putting cars into the statement, you realize cars aren’t meant to kill people.