Deep Book Review - Guns, Germs, and Steel
Overview
Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own? This is Yali’s question. This one simple question turned into the author, Jared Diamond’s life work. Guns, Germs, and Steel is the description of the leading theory in why some civilizations rise and others fall. A question that has been debated for eternity and some claim that this book answers it. Diamond’s theory goes much more in-depth than most people could imagine, from the history of cows to the leaders of China, Guns, Germs, and Steel dives into it all.
The theory is that based on geography, certain countries will thrive and others won’t, leading
…show more content…
In my opinion, his first book that left a mark on the world was Agriculture: The Worst Mistake In the History of The Human Race. After hearing the thesis of this book, I know better understand some of his reasoning in Guns, Germs, and Steel. He first claims that agriculture brought more malnutrition and disease than it brought good. While is disagree with this because of the prosperity that resulted far, later on, it is an interesting concept that you can see was brought over into Guns, Germs, and Steel. For a substantial amount of time, many historians believed that Diamond had cracked the code of civilization. They all thought that he had finally discovered why some civilizations rise and others fall. This impacted the way many saw history. They saw it from more a point of view focused on resources rather than great people.
While Diamond’s book gives a great insight into this concept, it doesn’t come without its plot holes. It only answers why some parts of the world are less fortunate than others, but Guatemala and Venezuela are in very similar climates with similar access to an ocean, yet people in Venezuela are starving to death, they are eating their own pets, eating bark off of trees. On the other hand, Guatemala may not be a world superpower, but it is actually a business central, there are many successful companies being run, people have colleges to choose from, restaurants
…show more content…
I feel that I now have a greater understanding of how the world works and how civilizations function. Using this knowledge, I can apply it to smaller groups rather than the whole world. It can help you understand people on the micro level and people on the macro level. Overall, this book was a great read and I am glad I chose it as my deep book. Without it, I wouldn’t feel as strongly about my history knowledge or theory. At first, I was reading it because I thought it was more related to the biology quest, but it turned out to be more about the history of the world than ecology. Guns, Germs, and Steel has changed me and the world through its groundbreaking ideas and provocative theories. It has a great way of combine logic with new ideas to make them seem both logical, but new and different. To clarify, this is not a book about ecology, nor is it a book about specific historical events based on dates and fact. It is more than that, its a combination of research and great thinking that resulted in a book filled with amazing information on the humans and the world function and become prosperous. If you are interested in learning how civilizations rise and fall, and if you are willing to think deeply about theory and history, then Guns, Germs, and Steel is the book for
Fahrenheit 451 created many ideas, such as true quality of books, purpose of why reading book are important, and if we stopped reading then the children from new generation will never read as well. Even though the internet and social media replaced our need of information, entertainment, and the books, the books shall be required to be read by everyone. Books have power, should be for everyone because books promotes knowledge to people, creates wider worldview, and keeps culture living through generation. In Fahrenheit 451, the people who never read book knew nothing.
This could be very disappointing to most history lovers who are anticipating new knowledge and analysis, which lacks in his writing. What was disappointing is that Standage fails to include drinks from various parts around the world. If this was his intention, he should have titled the book, “A History of Western Civilization in 6 Glasses.” Standage also fails to describe the full evolution of each drink and its own personal history. When talking about beer, for example, it was discouraging that he doesn’t mention Germany like one would hope or expect to learn more about.
Thinkers Beliefs How their ideas were radical at that time How their ideas are related to classical liberalism Hobbes His belief was that the reason why humans have so many problems is because of their greed to protect only themselves. And monarchy was always more interested in helping those who benefitted them in return. He believed that a fair executor who would use his authority to stop humans from harming others is needed. His ideas were viewed radical at that time because state had less power and monarchy had all of it, it was times of war where weak people would get killed if they did not listen to wealthier class. His ideas in my opinion are like the base of foundation of classical liberalism as him and his peers were the some of the first people to research the “state of nature”” of people which made many of his successors want to do more for the cause.
Black Like Me gave me more insight on racism, taught more about the importance of identity, and the arrogance of hypocrisy. The novel opened up my eyes to how gloomy it was to be dark-skinned in the fifties, even currently in the world today. Millennials have such a widespread source of how we can retrieve news and keep up to date with the world just at the press of a button; however, commonly having that ability is not always a fantastic thing. As a society we need to be more accepting of those who are unique, race does not define someone and people should not have to think “will they treat me as who I am regardless of my skin color or will they treat me as some nameless Negro?”
Fahrenheit 451 is a book of warning. It is a reminder that we need knowledge to survive, and we need people who crave this knowledge to take over in generations to come. We need knowledge to combat ignorance and we get this knowledge from reading books and listening to other people's opinions. It is a warning of what might happen if we were to let the ignorance win, and a warning to never let this happen. It is a warning that what we have is valuable and a reminder to never take that for granted.
Africa In World Politics: Engaging a Changing Global Order by John Harbenson and Donald Rothchild gives an analysis of how Africa has changed from being a European ruled colonial nation to a nation that it creating a name for itself in the global sphere. Beginning with Africa’s politics during the colonial era through the present. The book provides not only details about Africa but also how the changing world has affected African politics. The main focus of this book is to show the growth Africa has had since its time of colonization. Africa has grown as the world has changed although it has had to deal with internal conflicts and demands for political change due to its authoritarian regimes.
Many ideas led him to believe what he believed. One of them was, James Hutton’s ideas about geological change. His theory consisted that sediments, rocks, soil, etc were made after the great flood and new species “rose” from that disaster and that it’s a cycle. Charles Lyell’s theory also shaped his thinking. Lyell wrote the book of “Principles of Geology”, where Hutton became famous.
The journey I was taken on while reading the novel had a beneficial effect on myself, expressed significance to the world about a common topic and showed how the main character gradually changed throughout the story. I felt
This book, can relate to people who don't usually believe that they can make a change. That they have no effect on the world. This book, tells you straight up, that if you change yourself, you can change the world around you. This is very motivating, and a very awesome
People love this book for a plethora of reasons, but the main reason I come to find is the wisdom laced into every theme, and quotes that will send you deep
It taught me that strength and perseverance can make a significant impact in life. I also learned that forgiveness and the ability to forgive is much more powerful than I ever realized. This novel sucked me into the story and its characters and took me on an emotional ride of highs and lows. Finally, it forced me to reevaluate my previous judgement of the homeless.
Within the global economic order, theories and concepts are not always enough to change prevailing ideas or actions of greater states. However, there are examples of instances which the theory and action which resulted from that concept, were enough to change global economic governance. One such example is the changes to the intellectual property right legislation, which has drastically impacted the developing worlds access to medicine. However, on the other hand, dependency theory and its effect on the new global world order, stands in stark contrast. This research shall examine the concept of dependency theory, the impact or lack of impact it had on the idea of the new economic world order, the change to intellectual property rights and the
When I first met someone who didn’t like the book I was beyond shocked. Right at that moment, I realized that reading has its own effects on me. Reading has changed my writing skills, it has improved my knowledge and lastly, it has helped me manage my stress while going through hard times. Without reading I wouldn’t be the person that I am today.
He was the founder of rationalization. He believed that rationalization was a central problem in this world and the power of ideas shapes and changes society. Members of preindustrial societies embrace tradition. To him Industrial societies describe by rationality. Rationalization is historical changes from tradition to rationality as the main type of human thought (societies differ in how people think of world).
Karl Marx’s legacy in social theory does not lie in his predictions of future utopias but it rather lies in his analyses of the contradictions, as well as the workings, of capitalism. Within contemporary sociology, this tradition is very much alive in world-systems analysis, it is a perspective that has been developed by Immanuel Wallerstein in the 1970’s. The Modern World-Systems (MWS) theory is a macroscale and multidisciplinary approach to world history, as well as, social change. The MWS theory emphasizes the world system, as opposed to nation states, as the primary unit of social analysis, but it is not the sole unit of social analysis. According to Wallerstein, the modern nation state lies in a broad political, economic and legal framework