In this paper, I will explain how Lloyd’s views on heteronormativity will eventually be outdated, that because there is a norm of heterosexuals that is not how everyone feels, and lastly that violence can take place on a smaller scale and it doesn’t require a sexual relationship to be harmed. Heteronormative violence does not define how individuals function in society because it is rapidly changing as well as there are different aspects that aren’t addressed.
Lloyd describes heteronormativity as the norm that has been centered on being heterosexual and creates grounds to oppress those that are not conforming to that norm. Lloyd specifically is talking about Gwen Araujo and how heteronormative violence influenced the events that took place.
…show more content…
She goes on to make the conclusion that “heterosexuality is the default position in a society” (263 Lloyd). As she continues, she elaborates on how our bodies in the past have been defined as being distinct and determined by our genitalia. Society has defined the roles and our characteristics such that we will either be masculine or feminine and Lloyd agrees when she claims that heteronormativity affects the characteristic traits that make us who we are. Due to this consequence of attraction, she claims that this is how societies are regulated by heteronormativity. Ultimately, she defines the violence that is a result of the norm as “the ordering and classification of bodies according to the norms of sex, gender, and sexuality denoted above” (Lloyd 266). When Lloyd is focusing on the oppression of a class in our society she is evaluating the impacts due to their gender …show more content…
I have witnessed many friends who do identify as lesbian and gay, and they do not fear their life. They have never once been physically harmed due to the fact they are not heterosexual. However, they have been harmed emotionally and mentally. Lloyd does not talk much about the violence that is not physical. She discusses the violence and harm that comes from the sexing of the body. Which does have mental and emotional effects, yet she does not have that strong of an argument in that aspect. To give an example, my friend told about the time that she came out to her parents and her parents expressed regret that they didn’t raise her right. They also expressed deep remorse about the choices that their daughter made. This has harmed her emotionally and mentally as she now does not feel the support of her parents. This is an example of the violence and harm that is due to heteronormativity. The reason why is she was harmed was because there was an assumption that she would naturally like males. Yet, she is not attracted to them and therefore has to talk to her parents and tell them that she is not like they thought. Therefore, because the norm is being heterosexual, she had to iterate that she was different, which inflicted
The LGBTQ community is one that faces an ongoing storm of stereotyping and stigmas and the media is no relief from it. One major factor in this is the common trope of the violent and aggressive transgender woman, which is often shown through
The overall tone she uses towards the notion is somewhat disgust and contempt. She describes the matter as “there are worrying signs that battle to put gender and sexuality at the forefront of all teaching and learning is going too far.” The use of scare quotes throughout the piece suggest that the words should not be taken at face value. It is often used to suggest disbelief or actual disagreement with the words as they are being used, as if the words don’t actually exist. Examples comprise “cisgenderism”, “heterosexism”, “transgender” and “gender dysphoria”, all of which are genuine words in the oxford dictionary.
As someone who feels as though they are well versed in issues of LGBT discrimination and history, I felt so taken aback by this history of violence and systemic homophobia, and that I wasn’t even fully aware of it’s extent. Feinberg’s writing provided me with a lot of insight relating to current issues and the history of the LGBT movement. The most important thing I think to take away from this novel is to think outside of the binary in terms of gender expression or sexual orientation. Humans are not black and white and neither are their psychological makeups, trying to fit all of humanity into two neat, strict boxes does not work for a vast majority of the population. Realizing that even within the gay and lesbian community pressure to identify as “the man” or “the woman” in a relationship is very real.
The case study does not really take a deep dive into how she feel or identifies as being a white female who is lesbian.
She also starts to explain to the reader some of her own struggles with gender roles. This is a quote from the article, “After pushing over obstacles in my own life and devoting many hours to thinking about gender and football, the issue walks in and grabs and after school snack in my house.” This excerpt shows the writer referencing personal experience in her life. Furthermore, the article displayed a tone of irritation and sarcasm. This is seen in the following quote, “You know the whole thing where we tell our girls they can be anything they want to be, and then we watch the way woman in the public sphere are treated?”
Brandon is a transgender male who is raped by two of his girlfriend’s, Lana, family members. This quote accurately describes how Brandon felt after he was raped by John and Tom: “Whether the victims are female of male, men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators. But we call it a women’s issue? Shouldn 't that tell us something?” (Katz 342).
She employs many literary devices that support her specific claim in this passage as well as she provides many clear examples of how stereotypes have shaped young girls’ lives throughout the book. Through these examples she succeeds to use them as evidence so the audience does not conform to
This viewpoint is dangerous because it views such concepts as a final product, instead of a dynamic process by ignoring the multidimensional process taking place. The reification of the Latinx/Hispanic community has led to notion outside and within the latinx community that there are no LGBT people. This is very problematic because it has served as a basis for discrimination within the Latinx community on its own people where one is “less” latina/o because of their sexual orientation. In the essay, “No te Rajes--Don’t Back Down!
Serano effectively emphasizes herself being transsexual to make herself appear to have a broader, and unbiased, perspective on the way both men and women are treated, providing credibility to her large use of anecdotal evidence later in her essay. However, some may be unsatisfied in Serano’s omission of the limits of her knowledge, leading her audience to question the authority of her claims when blind spots in her knowledge exits. For example, to explain her ability to analyze the predator/prey mindset Serano explains, “In thinking about these issues, I
This shows masculinity and sexuality because normatively men are seen as the dominant figure in a heterosexual, cisgender relationship and as shown in the media typically through movies, if a man sees a woman he is physically attracted to, he is going to seduce her for sex because she appears sexy and beautiful on the outside, and no thought is given to her personality or any other identity traits she may have. This quote also states that her mother was far below the age of consent, only 12 or 13 years old, and was still a child which would mean that if the man she
By having a lesbian relationship in the text, it shows representation and the normalcy of having a relationship with someone of the same sex. The two girls obviously care about each other; Anne is very concerned for Diana’s health when she accidently gets drunk. If we read it as queer, their relationship is positive and healthy, which provides great representation for queer relationships. It also shows that children have some innate understanding of what person they are attracted to, without understanding what “lesbian” or “queer” means. One of the disadvantages of reading the text as a lesbian relationship would be negating the importance of close female friendship.
Their attitudes contribute to the male-controlled environment that she experiences. For example, Manny, the father of Esch’s child, states that there is a “[p]rice of being female” (96). This
LGB teens tend to suffer much more than heterosexual teens, due to them being a minority and being an easier target for bullying. Consequently, they are “at far greater risk for depression, bullying, and many types of violence than their straight peers” (Hoffman). Being LGB should not affect the level of bullying, yet the mental health of LGB people are still at risk. As a teen questioning my sexuality and growing up, I feel discouraged to explore myself and learn about myself when being different sexually leads to such bullying and ridicule. This is similar to Tituba in The Crucible, in the way that she was bullied for her efforts against witchery.
Likewise, the film shows that transgenders are questioned for their existence. Some parents in the film indicated that they had hoped that “there would be another way” and that they did not understand why and how their children were gender-nonconforming. One of the parents portrayed a transgender life as “eternal death”. The film showed that even the closest people of these children complied to the concept of deviance and solidified the concept through their hostility towards the concept of transgender and their effort to bring their children back to the norm which in this case is gender conformation. It amazed me to see how strongly some parents felt about “preventing” their children from becoming the deviants.
This essay will demonstrate the creation and sustained social expectation of masculine and feminine lesbians as a continuation of heteronormative systems and fear of heterosexual hatred. While taking into