Haig's Opinions On The Generals Of World War I
Many say that the generals of World War 1 were donkeys and the infantry were lions lead to their death by their generals. Although many historians have their own opinions on the generals of World War I, a lot of highly acclaimed historians believe that the infantry were courageous and brave soldiers who laid down their life for their country. They also believed that the generals were cowardly and sat 30 miles behind front lines and stayed in luxurious conditions compared to that of the infantry and never saw the action of the front lines. I for one agree with this.
The British Generals were crude and ill equipped for the large scale war they fought. From the British empire, under General Haig’s control, 8,904,467 soldiers were deployed. Out
…show more content…
In the summer of 1917, Haig’s army had launched many failed full frontal assaults all along the Western Front. There was only one technological advance that was promising and that was the tank, but due to the conditions and the location that the battle of the Somme took place, it was difficult for tanks to make a large impact on the battle. The terrain along the 300 miles of the Western Front was no less suited to the terrain of the battle of the battles of Ypres which was wet, low lying ground. The tanks couldn’t live up to their full potential but still made a big impact in the later years of the war. Haig was well known for using an older style of warfare from the past century and said in 1926 that “...Aeroplanes and tanks are only accessories to the men and the horse…” and that he believes that a horse will be as useful as it has been in past wars fought. He believed that the cavalry was Britain's way to win the war, and had made the call for the cavalry to be ready to charge only to be shot down by enemy machine guns. Haig was so confident in his battle plans that had been outdated for many years, experiences on the battlefield would not change his opinion due to his stubbornness on the issue. Haig had fantasies of his cavalry to gallop across fields only to send a huge amount of infantry against the enemies, walking slowly in nice and orderly ranks to stay in control but becoming sitting ducks for German machine gun fire. This method of warfare had been proven faulty during the war of 1812, then later in the american civil war had finalised the incompetency of this method on many different occasions. The battle of Cold Harbour, fought in 1864 during the American Civil War, had further proven the
Daniel Morgan Dbq
99 Words | 1 PagesDaniel Morgan had a brilliant idea of setting his troops up into three lines. They would fight line by line which soon tired out the British. The front line was made out of around 150 riflemen. Since rifles are slow to load, but accurate, the riflemen were told to shoot the retreat. The second line was made out of 300 militiamen with muskets.
Summary Of 1776 By David Mccullough
449 Words | 2 PagesThe British had very low views of the American army, and often ignored warnings of attacks by the American army. I feel like the British would later regret their arrogance, as we get to see America win the Battle of Dorchester, and later the reclaiming of Boston from British occupation. This last chapter we get amazing insight into some of the greatest military minds of the time, and we learn much about what war was like in those ages, as compared to our more guerilla warfare style of
Compare And Contrast Grant Vs Lee
668 Words | 3 PagesLee show’s his raw skill beating Ulysses S. Grant in the battle of Cold Harbor using his superior defensive tactics which proves he is a better general than Grant. Cold Harbor was the final battle of Ulysses S. Grant’s Overland campaign, a series of battles in which was the first time Grant and Lee faced each other on the battlefield. The battle of Cold Harbor occurred during May thirty-first to June twelfth, eighteen sixty four. The most remembered part of the battle was a frontal assault on confederate lines that absolutely destroyed the union troops, seven thousand troops in less than an hour, some say most of the deaths occurred in the first ten minutes. One Confederate for every four Union soldiers.
Colonel Ezra Mclellan Qualities
894 Words | 4 PagesThe American Civil War was a bloody war that resulted from poor decisions and false beliefs in old tactics and strategies. One of the bloodiest battles fought was that of Antietam, Maryland, where General George B. McClellan commanded the Union forces against those of General Robert E. Lee’s Confederate forces. There were “36 casualties a minute, totaling 22, 717” by the end of the battle. Though McClellan easily outnumbered Lee two to one, his ego and personal delusions prevented him from making the necessary decisions that could have led to a shorter and more decisive victory for the Union. This battle alone has led to a large debate among historians on whether or not McClellan was a good commander.
1776 Summary
915 Words | 4 PagesThere was a major difference between the American military and the British
Michael Shaara's The Killer Angels
852 Words | 4 PagesThe Battle of Gettysburg is well-known for the unprecedented cannon barrage that occurred on the third day of battle. The amount of artillery used was unreasonably high for an attack that was hardly devastating, as the Confederates kept overshooting. Union Colonel Chamberlain who witnessed the cannonade explains, "...too much smoke; possibly that's why the Reb shells were going overhead. Reb artillery never very accurate." (Shaara, 311).
What Happened After The Second Continental Congress Declared Loyalists As Traitors
955 Words | 4 PagesYou might think about the war and wonder how in the world the British were unable to be victorious, and it really is mind-boggling. The British most likely lost the war because of the cockiness that they had about the war. They thought they couldn’t lose! Even though they had the most well trained troops in the world, and they captured almost every city and port, they still managed to lose the war! They most likely
Battle Of Camden Essay
1247 Words | 5 PagesCavalry units from each side stumbled upon each other and decided to retreat to wait for daylight. This is where Gates’s poor strategy came into play. He discovered that he would be fighting an experienced British Army under the command of Cornwallis. Instead of retreating, or regrouping, Gates decided that he would fight the British there. The terrain was horrible.
Colonel John F. Ohmer's Operation Camouflage California
1074 Words | 5 PagesThe British had concealed their facilities from Axis pilots, covering factories to look like empty fields and putting up dummy tanks in empty landscapes. These tanks could be constructed out of balloons, paper, or other material, all painted to give the illusion of large numbers of land units. This was not the first time someone from either side had used dummy tanks. Dummy tanks have a history dating back to World War 1 and the introduction of tanks in modern warfare. Both sides used them to throw off the enemy’s air attacks, hoping they would waste bombs and ammunition on empty fields.
Reasons Why The British Lost The Revolutionary War
358 Words | 2 PagesEven though the British had a lot of money the war was very costly. Another reason the British lost was because troops,
Why Did The War Of 1812 Changed America?
413 Words | 2 PagesThe British had over 243,000 soldiers and 500 active warships. With that amount
War Of 1812 Dbq Essay
980 Words | 4 PagesThe military did not have enough soldiers, and the soldiers they did have were not properly trained for war. Finally, the naval ships were vastly outnumbered by the British. The war ended up being fought in three separate areas; Chesapeake Bay, the South, and the North as a strategy to aid the lacking American
Bunker Hill: The Battle Of Bunker Hill
94 Words | 1 PagesThe British won the battle but faced a major consequence Of the 2,300 British soldiers who had gone through the ordeal, 1,054 were either killed or
Civil War Advantages
946 Words | 4 PagesIn spite of all this the British had many difficulties and challenges. They had no major allies, and the only outside help that they received was from German mercenaries they hired, which cost them a fortune. When the war started, the British army only numbered 48,000 strong, and only dwindled from there. They could not recruit enough soldiers for their army and eventually resorted to allowing convicted criminals to join, as well as expanding the age range to be from 16 to 50. They suffered from poor leadership as well, since promotions and positions could be purchased by wealthy people.
Battle Of Bunker Hill Battle Analysis
1128 Words | 5 PagesDespite their loss, the inexperienced colonial forces inflicted considerable casualties against the invading British, and the battle provided them with an important confidence boost. Colonel Prescott’s leadership throughout the battle is an excellent example of good mission command. Upon receipt of mission from higher and given limited resources, Colonel Prescott effectively issued orders to his soldiers, which ultimately led to
More about Haig's Opinions On The Generals Of World War I
Daniel Morgan Dbq
99 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of 1776 By David Mccullough
449 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast Grant Vs Lee
668 Words | 3 PagesColonel Ezra Mclellan Qualities
894 Words | 4 Pages1776 Summary
915 Words | 4 PagesMichael Shaara's The Killer Angels
852 Words | 4 PagesWhat Happened After The Second Continental Congress Declared Loyalists As Traitors
955 Words | 4 PagesBattle Of Camden Essay
1247 Words | 5 PagesColonel John F. Ohmer's Operation Camouflage California
1074 Words | 5 PagesReasons Why The British Lost The Revolutionary War
358 Words | 2 PagesWhy Did The War Of 1812 Changed America?
413 Words | 2 PagesWar Of 1812 Dbq Essay
980 Words | 4 PagesBunker Hill: The Battle Of Bunker Hill
94 Words | 1 PagesCivil War Advantages
946 Words | 4 PagesBattle Of Bunker Hill Battle Analysis
1128 Words | 5 Pages