Hamlet Shot by Shot Analysis Kenneth Branagh’s rendition of Hamlet took a 400 year old play and brought life to still pages it was written on. The many cinematic effects Branagh incorporated made all the difference in the atmosphere of the film. The themes that Shakespeare conveyed when he wrote the play also shine bright in the film. Branagh played with the audience’s emotions and made Hamlet a likeable young lad who seemed to just be down on his luck. The film had to be executed perfectly to encapsulate the revenge and madness that took part in it. The end of the play would have not felt as dramatic if Branagh wouldn’t have done everything perfectly. The madness that would eventually engulf Hamlet’s emotions needed to come directly before …show more content…
Branagh amplifies the scene by doing a lengthy medium shot that turns into a close up of Hamlet, doing a soliloquy, while the audience knows who lurks behind the mirror. The scene was really clever because it builds suspense when the audience knows something that one of the characters does not. Even though it may seem like it at first, the scene actually is not shown from Hamlets point of view in the film. The camera is ever-so-slightly positioned off of Hamlets shoulder, alluding to the fact Claudius and Polonius are watching his every move. After a timely shot of Hamlet doing his soliloquy, the atmosphere of the scene shifts from a slow, dark, drawn out speech, to a conversation with Ophelia. Branagh keeps the audience's attention by switching to a different mood while still being in the same scene. What, at the start of the scene, was once an empathetic feeling for Hamlet turned into a frighted fear for his well-being, captured perfectly in the …show more content…
With a shift of the scene, the audience discovers King Claudius and Queen Gertrude are also at the play, sitting in their royal seats. As the play is acted out in front of the crowd, Branagh does extraordinary work catching the audience’s attention with the camera. When the play continues, the actor queen says something along the lines of when a women takes a second husband she must have killed off the first. Branagh uses a crosscut in this scene to show the action; first he starts by panning the crowd, encapsulating their reaction as to what just happened in the play. Next, Hamlet is shown with a calm and even-keeled attitude as the camera shifts from the King and Queen, to Hamlet and Ophelia several times in the course of seconds. With the crowd in a bit of a flurry, the play continues, making the real King and Queen feel uncomfortable. After minutes of uneasiness in the crowd, Hamlet interrupts and the shot goes from a medium shot to a long shot, allowing the audience of the film to see literally everything that is happening in the theatre. When Hamlet starts speaking, crosscuts are once again used to gauge the audience, as well as build tension in the scene. Hamlet then starts to call out the King, referring to the murder of his father, and the scene shifts from a medium shot to a close up. King Claudius’s stunned reaction is then
Cinematic interpretation allows for a wider audience, in that the general public is much more likely to see film version of Hamlet than to attend it as a play. There are also elements of the story, such as the ghost, which can become much more believable for modern audiences through the use of special effects which plays cannot employ, such as a singular perspective and visual editing. Lastly, the way that film is captured and edited is an art in and of itself. Things like lighting and set design add meaning that can simplify the story or make it more intricate. This simply cannot be done with plays to the extent which it is done in film.
Both films are trying to convey the fact that Hamlet’s facade works in making the audience believe Hamlet is actually mad and to expose his parent’s relationship. The purpose of the “Mousetrap” scene was to find out if Hamlet sees that Claudius has a reaction to his play similar to his father’s death, so he could know if he really killed his father or not. During the scene, facial expressions, and movement will determine whether or not Claudius or anyone else have a reaction to the play making them guilty of the murder of King Hamlet. The film that does well in executing these certain characteristics is the Kenneth Branagh version of Hamlet. The acting company in the Branagh version shows Hamlet’s mad character and how it affects Claudius’ facial expressions and behavior within the scene.
Hamlet, who is the main protagonist in the play, is easily one of the most complicated characters in the play. Everyone that reads the play debates if Hamlet is actually crazy or if it is actually a big giant act in front of people he does not really trust. Time moved too fast for Hamlet during the play only a little under two months after his father’s death his mother got remarried to his uncle and his uncle took over the kingdom. Shortly after the marriage and the coronation the late king’s ghost appears before Hamlet when he tells the guards he wants to see it. The ghost tells Hamlet of his murder and Hamlet declares that he will exact revenge for his father’s death.
The best portrayal of Hamlet’s “To Be, Or Not To Be” soliloquy is the Kenneth Branagh interpretation of the scene because, in my opinion, Branagh does the best to demonstrate Hamlet’s feelings of madness through his tone and body language. Even though Branagh’s speech is quite slow, and in my opinion too slow, the speed at which he is speaking allows him to place more emphasis on the topics that drive Hamlet insane, such as “Th' oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely, The pangs of despised love, the law's delay…” The slow listings of these flaws Hamlet sees in today’s world places emphasis on each and every one, as well as an emphasis on the total flaws themselves. Branagh also does an excellent job of demonstrating Hamlet’s madness
Hamlet is one of the most remarkable tragedy plays in the world, thus there are many reproductions to create same sensation. Films of Hamlet are the most famous versions of these and there are so several films created. These include Branagh’s version released in 1996 and Tennant’s version released in 2009. Branagh 's film is four hours long movie trying to create the exact version of story Hamlet on the screen and Tennant’s is three hours long television film, famous because it is a modernized version of Hamlet. Although Branagh’s and Tennant’s versions films have vast differences, they are both be able to convey the play’s theme of madness in their films.
I had very high expectations for the movie because I thought reading the play was outstanding. This representation of Hamlet did not satisfy the great expectations that I had for the movie. I thought that the movie was rather boring while the play kept me on my toes the whole time. While reading the play, I wanted to know what was going to happen next, but while watching the movie, I did not really care to continue. I had huge expectations for the movie, but they were simply not met.
In Branagh’s version of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the ‘To be, or not to be’ speech is interpreted differently than other actors’. Branagh’s character, Hamlet, knows he is being watched by Claudius and Polonius. His disclosure about not committing suicide for fear of the afterlife is part of his plan to keep Claudius at bay until he can convince himself that Claudius is the assassin and find a way to get revenge. The set of this scene includes mirrors and mirrored doors but it is difficult to tell them apart. These are used very intriguingly by Branagh.
Branagh’s version was true to the plot and was based in a modern period of time, while Zeffirelli 's skewed away from the original text and set his film in the medieval times. However, while those dislike the medieval setting of Zeffirelli 's film, the way the director has his character roam throughout the kingdom, allows his viewers to observe the society during the period in which the play was set. Unlike in Branagh’s film, where characters were usually restricted to certain rooms in the castle. When comparing the overall quality of the two films, one can observe the amount of effort Branagh placed upon ensuring his portrayal of Hamlet was true to the script. Nevertheless, the greatest differentiation between the two films was how they portrayed the characters.
Contrasting his attitudes with the moments that the king walks in, his behavior towards Polonius while the play is preparing, and his actions to Ophelia during the play, Hamlet is sporadic, when alone with Horatio, he is calm and collected, then again the sudden resumption to his “antic disposition” when Rosencrantz and Guildenstern enter. There is a long break in which we don’t sense any insanity from Hamlet, this is due to the fact that he has no need to assume his disguise. When we find Hamlet with the players, he is giving them directions for the play. With the players, Hamlet acts normal and of sound mind because the players are not likely to betray him, they don’t have the opportunity or the wish to do so.
Throughout the Zeffirelli and Branagh adaptations of Hamlet and the actual text itself, a variety of different views can be
Like many things, Hamlet is intelligent and honorable, but his indecisiveness is the cause of his tragic downfall. In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare portrays that Hamlet is very incapable of finishing the task at hand. Throughout the drama Hamlet faces many trials and tribulations due to his late father Hamlet, who was murderously killed by Claudius. His inability to kill Claudius and himself is one grand flaw of an epic hero. After King Hamlets passing, Hamlet entered an unknown state of mind that not only feared others for his wellbeing, but also feared himself.
In the ever changing world of literature, one play stands the test and that is William Shakespeare's Hamlet. This dramatic, thrilling, tragic play tells the story of a “young prince of Denmark, Hamlet, who is seeking vengeance for his father’s murder.” () The storyline itself is able to grasp the reader, and take them alongside Hamlet as he slowly takes down his enemies and uncovers the secrets, betrayal, and scheming nature of his family. Aside from the storyline, what makes this play great is the monologues, as well as dialogues between characters. Shakespeare incorporates an array of vivid imagery, metaphors, and exquisite vocabulary to make known the passion and heart behind every single character.
In the final scene of Hamlet, Hamlet says “Being thus be-netted round with villainies, -- Ere I could make a prologue to my brains, they had begun the play” (Shakespeare 131). Hamlet ironically thinks to himself as a character in a play because he is so melodramatically self-conscious. By adding this sense of paradoxical exposure, Shakespeare shows his effort to foreground the fact that the audience is watching a play within the play. Since Hamlet is such a rich character, Shakespeare’s work shows how he has something within him goes beyond what a play is capable of representing.
The story of a young man by the name of Hamlet has been told since it was first written in the early 1600s. The timeless classic tells the tale of Prince Hamlet, who discovers that his mother had wed his uncle, two months prior to his father’s passing. He visits the throne in Denmark because he is disgusted at the act of incest, where the ghost of his deceased father confronts him, insisting that he was murdered by Claudius, the new king. Hamlet is enraged, and he becomes obsessed with the idea of proving the crime so that he can obtain revenge against Claudius (Crowther). Despite the myriad of themes that circulate throughout the Shakespearean play, many do not realize one hidden yet extensive theme: actions and their consequences.
Williams Shakespeare is recognized as the greatest English writer. One of his best works ever written is “Hamlet”, which is the most complex, confusing, and frequently performed play. The extreme complexity of the main character – prince Hamlet in this play contributes to its popularity until today. “Hamlet is supposedly the most quoted figure in Western culture after Jesus, maybe the most charismatic too” (Bloom 384). In the most famous revenge tragedy, his biggest weakness that he procrastinates completing his revenge for his father’s death by killing the murderer.