ipl-logo

Hammurabi's Code Dbq

1214 Words5 Pages

Hammurabi was the bringer of death. According to the background essay around 1800 BCE a man named Hammurabi became king of a small city-state called Babylonia.He didn’t really get along with other kings as far as more than 50 miles away. According to the map Hammurabi ruled over half of Mesopotamia . Hammurabi also ruled over a population of 1,000,000, but we are not here to talk about who Hammurabi was. We are here to answer the question did Hammurabi rule fairly? I think Hammurabi wasn’t fair because of his family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law. In one section of his code it talks about Family Law, which personally I think was unjust. According to document C in Law 195 it states that if a son strikes his father his hands shall …show more content…

According to document E in Law 199 it states that if he has knocked out the eye of a slave … he shall pay half his value. First of all isn’t the point of Hammurabi’s law supposed to be protecting the strong from the weak? Then why isn’t Hammurabi doing it with this law? Imagine if this slave isn’t worth much because he is weak then it wouldn’t really hurt the man who attacked him so they knock his eye out freely because it doesn’t affect them that much. This isn’t really protecting. If anything this is protecting the weak from the weak because some of the weak can’t afford his value. This isn’t fair to the slave because the punishment isn’t that big to some of the stronger people. Another Law 218 this law seems unjust to me as well. Law 218 states that if a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused death, … his hands shall be cut off. This law would make me not want to be a surgeon which they probably needed back then i’m assuming. The patient had a serious injury that could have possibly been untreatable and now they lost a surgeon which they probably had very little of . This isn’t fair at all they didn’t even have that big of a population with very little surgeons. So this brings it down every time a patient

Show More
Related

  • Hammurabi's Code Dbq Analysis

    657 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code DBQ King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Was It Just Dbq Research Paper

    545 Words  | 3 Pages

    Was it Just? “Cursed!” is what you'll hear if you decline the written rules of Hammurabi.400 years ago in 1754 Bce. A man named Hammurabi became king of a city called babylonia and made certain rules about family law, property law, and personal injury law and although they were laws, not all laws were fair. To begin with, Hammurabi made a decision to write rules for his land. But were they just?let's answer that.

    Read More

  • Was Hammurabi's Code Just Dbq Analysis

    775 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hammurabi’s code was not just because the personal injury laws did not protect all people equally, property laws were harsh and not protecting people enough, and the Family laws should allow people to be with whoever they want to be with. Looking at the evidence from the Personal Injury Laws states that punishments towards slaves are

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Dbq Essay

    623 Words  | 3 Pages

    So I think that Hammurabi's Code was just because of Family Law and Property Law. Hammurabi's Code was just and was supported by Family Law. Reason one, According to law 195 of Hammurabi’s Code states that if a son has struck his father his hand shall be cut off. This is just because you should never rise against authority anyways. Reason two, law 148 states if a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, he must take care of her until she dies or he can marry a second but the first wife will live in the house.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi: A Powerful Ruler Of Babylon

    394 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code covered many issues, including trade, marriage, and divorce. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was fair and just. There many reasons why Hammurabi’s code was fair. For example, Property Law number 21 states: “If a man has broken through the wall [to rob] a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall which he has made.” This law is fair because if you broke through someone’s wall, they will have to spend lots of time and money to repair it.

    Read More

  • What Is The Code Of Hammurabi Code Dbq

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Code of Hammurabi exposes the people’s intolerance towards the breaking of their laws. The vast majority of their punishments revolve around execution, heavy fines, and public humiliation. The penalty for stealing during a fire was to be thrown into the fire. It is also made clear that using fear was a device they used to get what they wanted. They chose to scare their citizens into submission.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Hammurabi's Short Phasing

    104 Words  | 1 Pages

    Code#195 states “If a son has struck his father, his hand shall be cut off.”(12), which is self-explanatory; a son who hits his dad gets his hand cut off. Losing a hand in this case would seem like an extreme punishment; however Hammurabi’s Code is based on a lex talionis principle when directly translated means “an eye for an eye” where punishment will reflect what crime was committed. 195’s short phasing is significant because specific details or alternate situations were given to code related to family matters. Since there are no alternate events where the father provoked such a response it is likely

    Read More

  • Babylonian Law Code Of Hammurabi

    1492 Words  | 6 Pages

    To keep up request and stay away from bedlam in Babylonia, Hammurabi made a lifestyle for individuals to live by. He acted in a manner that God would in the Old Testaments of the Bible. Hammurabi managed his kin with an iron clench hand and took no disgrace in making samples out of the individuals who set out to challenge his reliable laws. Hammurabi 's Code spread into Assyria and turned out to be a piece of Assyrian life too. Both Babylonian and Assyrian society received living by "an eye for an eye".

    Read More

  • Hammurabi: The King Of Babylon

    459 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hammurabi 's code was made in 1800 b.c.e. In the 18th century, these laws were fair and valid however the punishments and consequences weren 't equal. The punishment you get was based either on your gender or what part of the social class you were in etc . From this point on we will discuss law #195,law#218 and law#23.Where the punishments and payment equal among all citizens. In my opinion, they weren 't. Hammurabi 's punishments and payments toward the citizens upper,middle and lower based on their gender or social status was unequal.

    Read More

  • Essay On Hammurabi's Code Just

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi's Code Vs Modern Law

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

    Read More

  • How Is Hammurabi Unfair

    675 Words  | 3 Pages

    These laws should both have the same consequences because all women should be treated equal. These laws on injury show that Hammurabi's code is very unjust. Hammurabi’s code may have been written to protect everyone, but the laws ended up being excessive and harmful. The laws about family, property, and injury are cruelly excessive and are unequal towards different classes.

    Read More

  • How Did Hammurabi Impact The World Today

    874 Words  | 4 Pages

    Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).

    Read More

  • How King Hammurabi's Codes Were Unjust?

    701 Words  | 3 Pages

    King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law. First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hammurabi claimed that his laws were both just and helpful to a wide range of people, but the majority of the laws don’t support either of his claims. In the instance of many laws, he appears to be very drastic with his consequences. In one of his codes, he says that if a women is caught in adultery with another man, both people must be tied up and thrown into the water (doc C, law 129). The act of binding the two people together and drowning them is a very specific and extreme repercussion for cheating. Another example of Hammurabi’s unnecessary harshness, was the law stating that if a man has broken into another’s house he shall be put to death by piercing him or hanging him in the hole which he made in the house (doc D, law 21).

    Read More

More about Hammurabi's Code Dbq

Open Document