The Gupta empire on the other hand was more influential even though they did not have any influential ruler and had a smaller empire. Both the Mauryan and Gupta empires changed through government structure, religion, and society. These two empires fed off of each other in religion because they both were Hindu and later on had sparks of Buddhism. In government the Mauryan Empire went off of the Ashashastra for guidance on how to rule
Being 520 years apart caused Han China and the Gupta Empire of India to differ in their political administration but share similarities in their economic development and treatment of women. Han China and the Gupta Empire differed in their political administration. While Liu Bang enforced a strong centralized government, Chandra Gupta implemented a highly decentralized government. The Han’s government, modeled after the preceding Qin Dynasty, meant that in theory the emperor’s power were absolute and infallible. As long as the emperor maintained the Mandate of Heaven, he would continue to command complete control.
Han China and Mauryan India had many similarities. They were both bureaucracies, they both had emperors, and both empires established their laws on religious belief. They also had a lot of contrasting ideas for positioning their people, and they had contrasting ideas for their different religious standpoints. One empire put more weight on logic, and the other more on religion. Both Han China and Classical India used social structure systems as a method of political control.
Another factor that shows the difference between Athens and Han China are their types of government. Document 4 is a quote from Pericles, an Athenian leader. Pericles stated, “Our form of government is called a democracy because its administration is in the hands, not of a few, but of the whole peoples” (Doc 4). This quote here shows the main difference between Han China and Classical Athens. IN Athens, which upholds direct democracy, all free male citizens are entitled to vote, while in China, only the emperor and his advisors can.
The dynasty that succeeded the Qin, the Han, continued the centralized government and they started a westward expansion that would encourage trade and cultural diffusion. The Qin and Han Dynasties were similar in that they both believed in a strong centralized government, which strengthened and unified their empires, but they differed in that the Qin followed the strict Legalism while the Han followed the more flexible Confucianism, and the way they interacted with outsiders; the Qin tended to be more defensive of outsiders while the Han were more interactive and wanted to build relationships with foreigners. First, the Qin and Han Dynasties believed in a strong centralized government. The implementation of a strong centralized government led to the success and growth of their dynasties. The centralized government creates a pyramid of power and influence, with the main leader, the emperor, on top.
China and Vietnam had relations in agriculture, and intellect, but differed in religion, and Vietnam had possessed a much lower form of patriarchy in society. 15. Japan had started with early nomads occupying the area, and had a unique system in which the emperor didn’t serve as the all powerful, which led t extended well-being of the government system. Emperors served as a face for power, but in medieval Japan, the growth of the idea of decentralizing had become prominent. The military system had also been different as opposed to other areas, where a samurai had protected the families of lords and
Clashes over power and transitions across dynasties and lineages defines modern China. The intermingling of various cultures and walks of life, are a result of the warring dynasties. Constant usurping of power, decentralized powers create this melting pot. To understand modern China, it is important to pay homage to the exemplary patrons: Ancient Dynasties, ranging from Neolithic patriarchies to centralized empires. While many of these dynasties were separated by centuries and kilometers, an examination in the process of their ambition can reveal details about their impact on modernity.
The Chinese development of technological advances, allowed the era of the Tang, and the Song dynasty to bring about a social, political, and urban change. The Chinese found new techniques in Agriculture and farming rice. This allowed for more growth and spreading of population in the regions. As the population grew, people were interest in new jobs and careers in the markets. So, they sought out jobs such as shop sellers, blacksmiths, metallurgy, fishing, and government work.
The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history. Gaozu, the founder of the Han dynasty was the first low-ranked official to found a dynasty in imperial China.