Happiness & McCandless
Happiness has been often mistaken for another emotion while in reality it comes from the translated form of the greek concept of eudaimonia which means flourishing, or literally translated to “good spirit”. With the concept of happiness clarified to an abstraction of fulfilment, or acceptance in life, rather than just a term used for a feeling of elation, it becomes a more open ended discussion piece due to the questions one could ask. What constitutes happiness? Can you achieve true happiness if it is an abstract concept? An interesting point of view of happiness comes from the literary works of american romanticism from eighteen twenty to eighteen sixty with Thoreau, and a later person who held the ideals of the romantics, Christopher McCandless, the two of which I will compare with my own idea of happiness. My own personal experiences of happiness have been limited due to my age so I have not had the time to really experience a longer life and therefore a more extensive grasp on the trials and tribulations of a lifetime. However with the hand I have been dealt so far, my concept
…show more content…
He grew up in a urban environment where people were very hedonistic and ungrateful which led to his outlash and abandonment of his family and home. McCandless spent a lot of time running from his past and he did have human interaction, but he kept leaving it as if he was reminded of his past, and hated it. At the end of his journey, in Stampede Trail, Alaska and spending a extensive time there he wrote in one of his books that “happiness only real when shared” (Krakauer 189). With this quote it seems to mean that after living a long time without human interaction he realized that he could live with others normally and did not have to live like that to be
In his article "In Pursuit of Happiness: Better Living from Plato to Prozac," Mark Kingwell describes how there has been many debates on the meaning of happiness for many years yet still a singular, justifiable definition eludes society. The pursuit to define and understand happiness has invited several debates, questions, arguments, and suggestions alike. In 1996, a hand full of genetic and behavioral studies suggest evidence that one’s achievable degree of happiness is genetically decided, with evidences showing that no achievement will change your happiness, you are either happy or you’re not. Some studies demonstrated a correlation between dopamine levels in the brain and expressions of personal satisfaction, while others indicated that
McCandless was a man who likes to be independent ever since he was a kid. “... He didn’t seem to need toys or friends. He could be alone without being lonely” (Krakauer 107) explains he was not like an average kid who relies on their family or friends but did almost everything by himself. His personality made choose certain decisions such as doing things on his own, “ He resisted any instruction of any kind” (Krakauer 111).
He had a passion to discover adventure even if it was something insane. Krakauer writes, “The very basic core of a man’s living spirit is his passion for adventure. The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon” (Krakauer 57). Part of Mccandless’ adventure was starting over with is life. He is changing his view of the horizon to something new.
He has trouble opening himself up to get to know people because he doesn’t want to allow himself to get hurt anymore. In chapter 6, John Krakauer states that “McCandless was thrilled to be on his way north, and he was relieved as well- relieved that he had again evaded the impending threat of human intimacy, of friendship, and all the messy emotional baggage
He decides to live simply, like Thoreau, not only retreating into nature, but he also living a purer, simpler life. Without money and material goods, he is truly espousing Thoreau’s views, as he decides to not be beholden to anything. McCandless cuts ties with anything reminiscent to society, clearly viewing it unnecessary to live according to societal norms, as he believes - like Thoreau - that this makes the individual lose sight of what life is supposed to be like. Without any money, McCandless finally feels free. To focus on possessions is wrong, according to McCandless’s borrowed views on life.
It is the goal everyone seeks some secret key to, expecting an external force to magically unlock eternal joy. However, no secret key to joy exists. While material things provide temporary pleasure or sorrow, nothing in the world can ‘grant’ continual elation. Instead happiness comes from a positive mentality, where a person appreciates their blessings and strives to overcome their challenges. The true thinkers, like Lincoln, realize that only they hold the power over their happiness.
McCandless’s whole reason for his actions was how he was sick of reality. He wanted to experience a life without materialistic things like money and possessions. He knew that in order to live a life without responsibility, he had to leave everything behind including his family. In the chapter “The Stampede Trail” a friend of McCandless, Andy Horowitz, said that
McCandless didn’t want to live a life full of unhappiness and he felt that the only way to avoid that was to get away from his family and go into the wild. McCandless was raised in a wealthy family and he had all the opportunities that came with that. He was a bright student and had a bright future ahead of him. He wanted to live a simple life and experience nature. So he left everything behind and went into the wild.
In addition, in a journal entry, McCandless writes, “It is the experiences, the memories, the great triumphant joy of living to the fullest extent in which real meaning is found. God it’s great to be alive! Thank you. Thank you” (Krakauer 37). This excerpt shows that McCandless sincerely is at peace with himself and the world because of where his ideals have taken him.
The purpose of this essay is to pick apart Mill’s essay and to give my own personal opinion about happiness. Stuart believed that you could achieve happiness by helping others achieve happiness and by finding things that you enjoy in life. I believe the key to happiness is helping other people achieve their happiness, do things that you enjoy doing, and looking at things in the brightest way possible. I honestly believe that everyone wakes up in the morning wanting to be happy, I have never seen a person who wakes up saying, “ I want to have an absolutely miserable day today”. It is human nature to strive for happiness and do things that you enjoy to do.
The pursuit of happiness is perhaps Man’s longest and most desired journey in life. Many philosophers throughout the ages have nonetheless defined happiness in different ways than one another. Some have argued that happiness can be found by pursuing one’s desired goals, others have said that happiness is a mere ideological concept that can only be achieved when one’s state of mind is rightly structured. In spite of disagreements between philosophers, many have focused on the concept of external goods, where some view it essential to happiness and others did not. No one can deny the pleasure that can be acquired from receiving a multi-million dollar check, nor can anyone deny the joy in owning an expensive luxurious car.
I do think we are in control of our own happiness because I think the human controls how we feel on a day to day bases because of the actions we do so really I do think we control our own happiness just how we control our actions. So One example is our decisions that we do during the day make our happiness because if you start thinking about all this negative stuff you won't be happy therefore like say if your in school and all this negative stuff starts to happen you just got to deal with it because if you don't then that shows that your not a strong person inside and that any little thing will bother and will ruin your day and so if you just know how to deal with it and put it aside and not let it break your happiness then that shows that
Pangloss: Martin, there is no doubt that we have faced great suffering in recent years. However, had I not suffered the “hellish torment of disease (Voltaire 8),” hanging, dissections, lashings, and rowing in the galleys (Voltaire 75), I would not feel the happiness of enjoying this walk with you in this beautiful and bountiful garden. All events of suffering experience throughout our existence are linked in this best of all possible worlds (Voltaire 79). And I must say, my dear Martin, that “nothing could be better (Voltaire 2)” and we are living a life of true happiness cultivating our land.
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, the concept of happiness is introduced as the ultimate good one can achieve in life as well as the ultimate goal of human existence. As Aristotle goes on to further define happiness, one can see that his concept is much different from the 21st-century view. Aristotelian happiness can be achieved through choosing to live the contemplative life, which would naturally encompass moralistic virtue. This differs significantly from the modern view of happiness, which is heavily reliant on material goods. To a person in the 21st-century, happiness is simply an emotional byproduct one experiences as a result of acquiring material goods.
Happiness is a Choice There is no greater feeling in the world than being happy. Believe it or not, happiness is a choice that comes from within. According to a theory in Psychology, all humans have a happiness “set- point” that determines their overall well-being. When something positive happens to a person, he becomes happy. On the other hand, when something negative happens to him, he becomes miserable.