It cannot be defined by just one thing. Satisfaction, like happiness, is mainly about one’s perspective on how their life is progressing. Meanwhile Diener and Biswas-Diener emphasize that how much someone is satisfied with money and material items is what causes them to be happy. We must always take into account what creates the splendor of happiness and satisfaction. We are all on this constant search for happiness, where we look for it in many different places, such as career achievements, material possessions and money.
Many people let external problems and concepts affect their mental health which in turn ends up suppressing their souls. There are many reasons why people are happy or not happy. I am a happy human being because I think that life is extraordinary, I am happy with what I have instead of what I do not have and I truly love myself and care for those around me. To begin I examine everything I see and as such I see beauty where beauty is not obviously seen. I make the most of the small things in life.
He also states that people choose to do things that make them instantaneously happy, even though that choice could harm them in the long run. Another thing that Porter thinks happiness relates to is the quality of someone’s life and how when
Most people, always do something that is hard for themselves, but they keep try to do it, even they are fail. That kind of action makes them become their ideal selves, it is the effort to reach their expectation to get happy.
Peony roses have a positive emotional impact on people upon receival such as the immediate boost of happiness, increased emotional connections in relationships, and increased long-term effects on mood for the reason of just having them displayed; therefore, people should give peony’s as gifts because everyone wants to be happy. In order to test the ideas about the positive emotional impact
Being happy means you enjoy everything you do. When being moral you do something because you have to, its what you ought to do. Happiness cant have anything to do with morality because its not universal. People are happy by satisfying their desires but everyone has different desires. To suffer making others happy means that you are a good person and you are being moral.
When discussing both act and rule utilitarianism, it is important to understand that both of them agree in terms of the overall consequence of an action, because they emphasize on creating the most beneficial pleasure and happiness in the outcome of an act. Despite this fact, they both have different principles and rules that make them different from each other. Act utilitarianism concentrates on the acts of individuals. Meaning that if a person commits an action, he/she must at least have a positive utility. The founders of utilitarianism define positive utility as happiness and pleasure and consider it to be a driving force of all positive and morally right acts.
It can be gain by doing achievement an individual accomplish through their life and show some joy into their self. In cases where happiness can be passed on to another person in the same area to have that pleasant feeling that may be there. Certain material items can be their happiness if an individual really wants them to make them happy. It could that their pride is blinding them form what true happiness is and sometimes that they do not realize. Other negative emotions can happen when there is a certain point where there is no hope and do not seem to move on from if it’s really bad or difficult.
Utilitarianism holds a view on the subject of morality of self-interest with the intentions of always doing well for all around. It would have to be a universally accepted action where it would do no harm to all involved. This theory holds a different view on happiness and where everyone’s happiness is equal to one another, there is no hierarchy of happiness among us all. The thought of utilitarianism is a great one, though in a sense that if it was possible we would all hold a similar level of happiness and when deciding on our actions we would consider the happiness of other as much as we held our own happiness. Although with this idea of utilitarianism we come to the problem of most humans being inconsiderate of others and how their intentions would have an effect on others lives.