The fist con of the public health model is that to focus on an individual’s health is more difficult to do, due to it also looks at the social issues that are happening that may be causing the individual to have their current issues (Woodside & McClam, 2015). The public health model emphasizes prevention more than treatment which is a great concept but if the client needs treatment than this can lead to them not understanding the steps to prevent the issue in the future which is another con of the public health model (Woodside & McClam, 2015). There are pros with the public health model and one of those pros it that the focus is on a larger population and not an individual so more people are getting the treatments that they need while preventing others from having the same issue (Woodside & McClam, 2015). A second pro of the public health model is that in today’s society health has a more positive meaning because people want to live a full life and be able to cope with circumstances in a positive manner (Woodside & McClam, 2015). The final of the three models is the human service model which I will discuss in the next section because it is also used to help clients with their daily
I thought that this chapter was interesting because I think in a similar way. He believed that for one to be moral, they need to have an appropriate motive for undertaking a task. It cannot be based on selfish reasons and it does not have to appease the public. You do something because it is right. He also states that we often mistake ideas for our own because of conformity.
My worldview is based off of strong morals and beliefs, but also an understanding of difference. I believe that you should stand up for yourself and protect your way of life but at the same time realize that difference is what makes the world spin. I couldn’t have asked for a better family than the one I have today. Sure they are hard on me, sure they may yell or get mad, but in the end they can see the future better than I can. Although, being able see the literal future would be pretty cool it’s not what I mean here.
This would make the beliefs and behaviors consistant with one another and avoid dissonance. The main point of cognitive dissonance is that people want consistency in their attitudes and beliefs and if their beliefs are inconsistent with their behaviors they will have a motivation to reduce the dissonance change which can give them the cause to change behaviors. This change can sometimes be illogical and absurd but it helps them to reduce the conflicting attributes.
A number of people believe before you speak as a negative practice. They state that when you think about your words before you speak them you censor your true words in fear of making another person feel offended by what you want to express. Thus, they suggest that we shouldn’t think before you speak, and instead always say exactly what is on our mind. Though I agree that we should censor our true thoughts only because another person might feel hurt by them, I disagree with the negative perspective on thinking before speaking, Thinking about our words before we speak them, in my opinion, will not always result in us censoring out true thoughts. On the contrary, through personal experience I have come to the conclusion that thinking before we speak has more pros than con, for it helps us express our ideas and thoughts clearly and exactly as we want them to be expressed, it prevents us from being unnecessarily offensive, and helps us stay out of trouble.
These devices were used to show the stress in a certain situation, as well as the repercussions. This theme may seem irrelevant to most of society, as people are not normally faced with conflict as great as war. It is important, however, to remember that decisions made in a stressful environment should always be well thought out to avoid regretful
Being passionate about a subject is often seen as a negative, but I tend to disagree. Having a strong opinion should not be looked down upon. However, refusing to listen to opposing viewpoints, and not respecting these opinions should be. Also, many describe me as passionate due to my dedication. When I discover a topic that intrigues, I aim to learn everything about it while also trying to be the best I can be.
While this may all come from a cartoon, there are some real life applications that you can gather from them. First, you might think that isolating ourselves from the people who care for you is a good choice for reflecting and solving problems. While that may be effective, you should also consider their help as they want nothing else but your wellness. Second, you must face the cause of your vulnerability, not bury it deep within the past. Lastly, you should be determined in what you do, but do not disregard compassion.
Not every emotion is meant to hurt someone mentally, but if people can accept this and use it to their advantage, it will give them a way to express how they feel, allow them to understand why they feel this way, and it will permit them to find a solution to overcome how they feel. If people continue to hold back their emotions, this can cause many issues and may even make the mind numb towards future issues to where no solution can be formed for that individual. When people can express their feelings, especially when it is towards something awful, they can accurately convey their emotions. Inside Out successfully proves that not every emotion will impact someone
He wanted to do something that would help him feel less guilty, he wanted to be good again and this is why this line was so significant to Amir when he heard it and it is important to people in general. No one wants to do something that they regret, no one wants to commit sins and be a bad person, but sometimes our situations that we are stuck in and immaturity make us do something that we regret, it makes us commit sins and sometimes we are the bad people even if we committed the action unintentionally or in anger and when we hear that line of “There is a way to be good again”, we feel like there is hope, there is a way to be good again and it begins to feel very significant to us. Once upon a time, when I was 10, I was with my best friend and we had a plan to go see a movie together. He told his family that he cannot go out with them because he had plans with me and so his family left to go out to eat, but my other friend, who hated my best friend, said if I go with him he will buy me free movie tickets. I ditched my best friend and went to see movie with other friend and I felt so
Sometimes it is best to understand the law first before obeying it. When one thinks a law is unjust, they will go out of their way to go against it and do something about it. At a certain point, one doesn’t have to act accordingly to what they don’t believe in, but they can’t do whatever pleases them. There has been many controversies involving the act of non violence civil disobedience. Although most feel like breaking an unjust law might be the best solution to what they think is right, in reality, I agree to the fact that people are afraid to face the consequences that are given after their actions.
Most of the time the phrase “check your privilege” is used negatively. When used in this way it often intimidates people, and they feel the need to defend themselves. We can always find a reason to justify hostility but at the end of the day it 's still just that: hostility. And hostile, overused quotes like "check your privilege" doesn’t educate people, they just alienate them and turn them on the defensive. As James Baldwin said, “It is true that two wrongs don 't make a right, as we love to point out to the people we have wronged.
In society, people should be ethically responsible with helping people. People act ethically responsible when one is in need of assistance because they let their sympathetic feelings of compassion take over their intentions. Ethical responsibility is a duty or obligation to ensure the individual’s well-being through specific commitments; such as saving someone from a certain tragedy. One piece of evidence from the text that demonstrates the sudden acts of ethical responsibility is “Can the Law Make Us Be Decent” by Jay Sterling Silver. Though many may argue that Silver’s argument is invalid, most will agree that his argument is in fact agreeable.
In a way, I feel like they are looking at us, and thinking that he is trying to attack me or use me for something else. When this happens, I feel like it is my job to go out of my way to make sure that those people that are judging us, know that he is my friend. It is something that I feel, that I should never have to do, because to me the color of our skin or your racial background does not define what kind of person you are. It is sometimes hard for me to understand that other people look at people of color or people of different racial background as different, in a negative aspect. That is one way that racism affects me through
The SPJ code of ethics says, “treats sources, subjects, colleagues and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.” While they all had different reason for why they held their information, they all had the intention protecting their source because they tough it would help them out in the long run. Is It really ethical to withhold information with the intent of using them for more coverage later down the road, especially if they were doing something illegal? Probably not, but, they felt that the information they knew would do more harm than