Harrison Bergeron Essay

546 Words3 Pages
Introduction: Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. was published in 1961 and this sotry is a normal case of the author’s capability to blend science fiction and satire. It is the best useful story of regulation of absolute equality ever composed. In this paper, I will be highlighting the Harrison Bergeron as a picture of socialism and communism, considering the equality rule of the teachings to uncover the absurdity (Joodaki & Mahdiany). Harrison Bergeron tell the satire of the misconception of what equality involves. Vonnegut has written this story to tell that all people have strengths and weaknesses which make each of them uniquely individual (Gradesaver.com). George And Hazel George Bergeron, Harrison's father, bears numerous handicaps…show more content…
Diana Moon, the Handicapper General's first and center names, refers to the hunt of the Roman goddess (Gradesaver.com). Diana was known for her revenge, which could clarify the heartless murdering of Harrison Bergeron in this story. Diana Moon, the murderer of individuality and freedom, Vonnegut is alerting society not to lean totally towards being "equivalent in every way" or else society will lose its opportunities to exceed expectation of past it has become (Joodaki & Mahdiany). In a society of equality, Harrison Bergeron is the one who represents uniqueness by his mental and physical characteristics. In fact, he is characterized as “a genius, an athlete”. Harrison's just crime was taking control of the TV studio, yet his motives exceeded the crime. He was shot for presenting the world to excellence. Conclusion One of the reasons Harrison perceives that the inequality of forcing strong individuals (those physically, mentally, and intellectually) to surrender their strength for a systematic soceity of equivalent and honest residents (Joodaki & Mahdiany). This story is dealing with widespread subjects of equality, power, freedom and and media impact. Harrison Bergeron keeps on bringing out thoghtful reactions about individual freedom and equality in the United
Open Document